Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
What if foids objective when choosing who to reproduce with isn't based on choosing the objectively best options but is instead based on...
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OgreLTN" data-source="post: 52767" data-attributes="member: 413"><p>I don't think any of these things is ever thought of in the mind of women. Your rationalization just seems like a cope to me. Height will always be attractive, because it signals good bone development. Face will always be attractive because it signals less negative genetic mutations. And with every positive trait, it goes like this. Height getting stabilized just might mean that women that select for height now, just aren't having children, especially in the hypergamous west, instead opting for having children when they're hags at 40 years old. I have seen way too many old women with what seems to be their sons, and that son is not getting good development from being born to a 40-year-old. Add to that the oofy doofies that almost never are tall, being the ones having children with chad-used women.</p><p></p><p>Women are animals, so are men. We can't help our nature. It's just that simple. We just want to make it mean more because your consciousness comes from a human body. It's your own human experience clouding your judgment. You can't really see it... Because your human! We don't really mean much, us humans, really. </p><p></p><p>So if you're fucking 6 4 and have a decent face, go enjoy your time on earth, and stop being a lil nig ffs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OgreLTN, post: 52767, member: 413"] I don't think any of these things is ever thought of in the mind of women. Your rationalization just seems like a cope to me. Height will always be attractive, because it signals good bone development. Face will always be attractive because it signals less negative genetic mutations. And with every positive trait, it goes like this. Height getting stabilized just might mean that women that select for height now, just aren't having children, especially in the hypergamous west, instead opting for having children when they're hags at 40 years old. I have seen way too many old women with what seems to be their sons, and that son is not getting good development from being born to a 40-year-old. Add to that the oofy doofies that almost never are tall, being the ones having children with chad-used women. Women are animals, so are men. We can't help our nature. It's just that simple. We just want to make it mean more because your consciousness comes from a human body. It's your own human experience clouding your judgment. You can't really see it... Because your human! We don't really mean much, us humans, really. So if you're fucking 6 4 and have a decent face, go enjoy your time on earth, and stop being a lil nig ffs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
What if foids objective when choosing who to reproduce with isn't based on choosing the objectively best options but is instead based on...
Top