Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
What if foids objective when choosing who to reproduce with isn't based on choosing the objectively best options but is instead based on...
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OgreLTN" data-source="post: 52785" data-attributes="member: 413"><p>Shift in genetics on a world scale simultaneously throughout all women? That sound plausible? And why is that something that their genes would find beneficial, how can they communicate? Is there a World Wide Web for genes?</p><p></p><p>Normally it ends up being the same thing. Women whose genes made them attracted to height passed on their genes more due to the environment pressures, where taller men ended up reproducing and shorter men perishing against other taller men. Being tall is attractive for a reason.</p><p></p><p>This quite literally is studied in science. A lot of primates do this thing where females don't exude signs of being fertilized. It's called canceled ovulation. Women in the past would make men raise children who are not theirs, and enjoy the stability of having that so called LTN golden retriever. But nowadays with simple protection you can override this. So they can fuck other men, and not have their children. And after getting their share, they finally have a child at 40, whose genetic quality is absolute shit.</p><p></p><p>You can do you, but I thought doing this type of thing was relegated to outcasts and not the genetically fortunate</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OgreLTN, post: 52785, member: 413"] Shift in genetics on a world scale simultaneously throughout all women? That sound plausible? And why is that something that their genes would find beneficial, how can they communicate? Is there a World Wide Web for genes? Normally it ends up being the same thing. Women whose genes made them attracted to height passed on their genes more due to the environment pressures, where taller men ended up reproducing and shorter men perishing against other taller men. Being tall is attractive for a reason. This quite literally is studied in science. A lot of primates do this thing where females don't exude signs of being fertilized. It's called canceled ovulation. Women in the past would make men raise children who are not theirs, and enjoy the stability of having that so called LTN golden retriever. But nowadays with simple protection you can override this. So they can fuck other men, and not have their children. And after getting their share, they finally have a child at 40, whose genetic quality is absolute shit. You can do you, but I thought doing this type of thing was relegated to outcasts and not the genetically fortunate [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
What if foids objective when choosing who to reproduce with isn't based on choosing the objectively best options but is instead based on...
Top