Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Tartarus
When Chinese came in the 19th century they came with only men, when Vietnamese came in the 20th century they came with women and men
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MelaninWarlord" data-source="post: 59801" data-attributes="member: 428"><p style="text-align: center">That is an excellent point of distinction in Australian history. While the logic is similar to the American context, the specific Australian laws and the "White Australia" policy created a very unique—and often harsh—environment for these two groups.</p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">You are right: the 19th-century Chinese arrivals were almost exclusively male, whereas the 20th-century Vietnamese arrivals were family units. Here is why that contrast exists in the Australian story.</p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">1. The 19th Century: Chinese "Sojourners"</p> <p style="text-align: center">Between the 1850s and the late 1800s, tens of thousands of Chinese men came to Australia, primarily for the Gold Rushes in Victoria and New South Wales.</p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">The "Sojourner" Model: Most were young men sent by their villages or clans to earn money and send it back (remittances). They did not intend to stay forever, so they didn't bring wives or children.</p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">The "Bachelor Society": By 1861, there were roughly 38,000 Chinese people in Australia, but only a tiny fraction were women. In some mining districts, the ratio was as extreme as 1 woman for every 500+ men.</p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">Hostile Legislation: Australian colonies passed "Anti-Chinese" laws (like the Chinese Immigration Restriction Act of 1861) specifically to make it expensive and difficult for Chinese people to enter. Later, the White Australia Policy (1901) made it nearly impossible for those who stayed to bring their wives over, as the government wanted to prevent a permanent Chinese-Australian population from growing.</p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">2. The 20th Century: Vietnamese Families and Refugees</p> <p style="text-align: center">The arrival of the Vietnamese in the 1970s and 80s was a fundamentally different event. This wasn't a search for gold; it was an escape from war.</p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">The End of White Australia: The Vietnamese were the first major group of Asian migrants to arrive after the White Australia Policy was fully abolished (1973). This meant the government was finally open to non-European permanent settlement.</p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">Refugee Motivation: When the South Vietnamese government fell in 1975, people fled political persecution. Unlike the 19th-century miners, they weren't looking for a temporary job—they were looking for a new home. Families fled together on boats or were later reunited through the Orderly Departure Program.</p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">Government Support: Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser’s government actively supported the resettlement of Vietnamese refugees. Because the goal was integration, the government prioritized keeping families together in migrant hostels (like Cabramatta in Sydney or Springvale in Melbourne).</p> <p style="text-align: center">Summary Comparison</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MelaninWarlord, post: 59801, member: 428"] [CENTER]That is an excellent point of distinction in Australian history. While the logic is similar to the American context, the specific Australian laws and the "White Australia" policy created a very unique—and often harsh—environment for these two groups. You are right: the 19th-century Chinese arrivals were almost exclusively male, whereas the 20th-century Vietnamese arrivals were family units. Here is why that contrast exists in the Australian story. 1. The 19th Century: Chinese "Sojourners" Between the 1850s and the late 1800s, tens of thousands of Chinese men came to Australia, primarily for the Gold Rushes in Victoria and New South Wales. The "Sojourner" Model: Most were young men sent by their villages or clans to earn money and send it back (remittances). They did not intend to stay forever, so they didn't bring wives or children. The "Bachelor Society": By 1861, there were roughly 38,000 Chinese people in Australia, but only a tiny fraction were women. In some mining districts, the ratio was as extreme as 1 woman for every 500+ men. Hostile Legislation: Australian colonies passed "Anti-Chinese" laws (like the Chinese Immigration Restriction Act of 1861) specifically to make it expensive and difficult for Chinese people to enter. Later, the White Australia Policy (1901) made it nearly impossible for those who stayed to bring their wives over, as the government wanted to prevent a permanent Chinese-Australian population from growing. 2. The 20th Century: Vietnamese Families and Refugees The arrival of the Vietnamese in the 1970s and 80s was a fundamentally different event. This wasn't a search for gold; it was an escape from war. The End of White Australia: The Vietnamese were the first major group of Asian migrants to arrive after the White Australia Policy was fully abolished (1973). This meant the government was finally open to non-European permanent settlement. Refugee Motivation: When the South Vietnamese government fell in 1975, people fled political persecution. Unlike the 19th-century miners, they weren't looking for a temporary job—they were looking for a new home. Families fled together on boats or were later reunited through the Orderly Departure Program. Government Support: Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser’s government actively supported the resettlement of Vietnamese refugees. Because the goal was integration, the government prioritized keeping families together in migrant hostels (like Cabramatta in Sydney or Springvale in Melbourne). Summary Comparison[/CENTER] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Tartarus
When Chinese came in the 19th century they came with only men, when Vietnamese came in the 20th century they came with women and men
Top