Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Elysium
Which path next for Whitepillers?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vermeulean" data-source="post: 9480" data-attributes="member: 112"><p>[ATTACH=full]1988[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>subject: an individual who has accepted the blackpill and now seeks balance through the whitepill, either through stabilization or self-improvement. the subject seeks to resolve internal and external imbalances whilst acknowledging the conclusions reached through the blackpill.</p><p>other: any external entity which seeks to impose/regulate values, such as certain judgements or expectations which many are consigned to under the rules of the game.</p><p>object of perception: life outcomes, or an end-state which may come from a whitepilled perspective.</p><p></p><p>a consistent or balanced state is one whose affect valence multiplies out to a positive result. so in seeking stabilization, one views social norms as negative, and as such retreats from them, recognizing that preferred outcomes (X) under external forces which regulate said outcomes (O) is positive, which would entail a balanced state. if one views preferred outcomes as positively attainable, yet still begrudges society, there will be an imbalance if the map from O to X is positive, which would require an agent to unconsciously modify their own bias against O.</p><p></p><p>self-improvement efforts which positively align with social norms will still cause an imbalance if the subject views society negatively, which he inevitably will under the strict conditions of the blackpill. an immediate solution which comes to mind without needing to forfeit one's own self-autonomy would be to reject the positive mapping of O onto X in favor of pursuing an ideal of self-improvement which does not strictly align with social expectations (P to O negative, O to X negative, P to X positive): but this could have adverse consequences, such as social disengagement, though i suppose if you have already accepted the blackpill you won't worry too much about this. so long as there is a technical balance, it is certainly very achievable i.e accepting reality, managing social pressures and judicatively acting in reference to them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vermeulean, post: 9480, member: 112"] [ATTACH type="full" width="669px" alt="1728398068503.jpeg"]1988[/ATTACH] subject: an individual who has accepted the blackpill and now seeks balance through the whitepill, either through stabilization or self-improvement. the subject seeks to resolve internal and external imbalances whilst acknowledging the conclusions reached through the blackpill. other: any external entity which seeks to impose/regulate values, such as certain judgements or expectations which many are consigned to under the rules of the game. object of perception: life outcomes, or an end-state which may come from a whitepilled perspective. a consistent or balanced state is one whose affect valence multiplies out to a positive result. so in seeking stabilization, one views social norms as negative, and as such retreats from them, recognizing that preferred outcomes (X) under external forces which regulate said outcomes (O) is positive, which would entail a balanced state. if one views preferred outcomes as positively attainable, yet still begrudges society, there will be an imbalance if the map from O to X is positive, which would require an agent to unconsciously modify their own bias against O. self-improvement efforts which positively align with social norms will still cause an imbalance if the subject views society negatively, which he inevitably will under the strict conditions of the blackpill. an immediate solution which comes to mind without needing to forfeit one's own self-autonomy would be to reject the positive mapping of O onto X in favor of pursuing an ideal of self-improvement which does not strictly align with social expectations (P to O negative, O to X negative, P to X positive): but this could have adverse consequences, such as social disengagement, though i suppose if you have already accepted the blackpill you won't worry too much about this. so long as there is a technical balance, it is certainly very achievable i.e accepting reality, managing social pressures and judicatively acting in reference to them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Elysium
Which path next for Whitepillers?
Top