Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="somethingtobelievein" data-source="post: 74824" data-attributes="member: 90">Felt like I was pretty cordial.&nbsp; Didn&#039;t mean to upset you guys so much.I mean, yeah?&nbsp; I gave a bunch of disclaimers through the conversation that I was not talking about all people or that any outcome was guaranteed.&nbsp; If I failed to, then yes exceptions exist.[ATTACH=full]15131[/ATTACH]So my logic was bullshit because I said something right but didn&#039;t go into more detail or paste a link to a paper.I understand that it normally doesn&#039;t if it involves trying to deny gender.I&#039;m sorry, and I do apologize.&nbsp; I should have made this more clear.&nbsp; When I said they go into the doctors office and are immediately given pills, I was exaggerating for effect.&nbsp; I see now that it was folly to think that would be evident.I did then go search the underlying source for the underlying 41% number being discussed.&nbsp; What was shared with me was a screenshot of a chart of ratios with no source or raw data.Oh I&#039;m sorry.&nbsp; I thought [USER=25]@GripMaxxing[/USER] was a man taking female hormones based on what he said throughout the conversation.&nbsp; Also I&#039;m terribly, terribly sorry if I implied he&#039;s a bot.&nbsp; I believe he exists.Still wish you both the best.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="somethingtobelievein, post: 74824, member: 90"] Felt like I was pretty cordial. Didn't mean to upset you guys so much. I mean, yeah? I gave a bunch of disclaimers through the conversation that I was not talking about all people or that any outcome was guaranteed. If I failed to, then yes exceptions exist. [ATTACH type="full"]15131[/ATTACH] So my logic was bullshit because I said something right but didn't go into more detail or paste a link to a paper. I understand that it normally doesn't if it involves trying to deny gender. I'm sorry, and I do apologize. I should have made this more clear. When I said they go into the doctors office and are immediately given pills, I was exaggerating for effect. I see now that it was folly to think that would be evident. I did then go search the underlying source for the underlying 41% number being discussed. What was shared with me was a screenshot of a chart of ratios with no source or raw data. Oh I'm sorry. I thought [USER=25]@GripMaxxing[/USER] was a man taking female hormones based on what he said throughout the conversation. Also I'm terribly, terribly sorry if I implied he's a bot. I believe he exists. Still wish you both the best. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread