Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wait whattt? :o" data-source="post: 74938" data-attributes="member: 564">No, it&#039;s not silly to bring up exceptions. They are important to stress test current understanding of things. That&#039;s how science works all the time and that&#039;s why we&#039;ve reached this level of technology and advancement today. You are right to bring up such exceptions.So I think I understand you. Anybody that got the &quot;Y&quot; is essentially a male.Why? Does this have to do with the SRY gene present in the Y chromosome that triggers the development of the testes (which then leads to male developmental pathways)?I think my understanding of your view is that, as long as someone is &quot;geared&quot; towards male development, they are male. It doesn&#039;t matter if they actually undergo male developmental pathways. Hence the focus on the Y chromosome due to the SRY gene. Is that correct?Edit: added a little tidbit about my perspective of your view</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wait whattt? :o, post: 74938, member: 564"] No, it's not silly to bring up exceptions. They are important to stress test current understanding of things. That's how science works all the time and that's why we've reached this level of technology and advancement today. You are right to bring up such exceptions. So I think I understand you. Anybody that got the "Y" is essentially a male. Why? Does this have to do with the SRY gene present in the Y chromosome that triggers the development of the testes (which then leads to male developmental pathways)? I think my understanding of your view is that, as long as someone is "geared" towards male development, they are male. It doesn't matter if they actually undergo male developmental pathways. Hence the focus on the Y chromosome due to the SRY gene. Is that correct? Edit: added a little tidbit about my perspective of your view [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread