Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Schwarzwald" data-source="post: 66868" data-attributes="member: 544">Before the feminist infection, women weren&#039;t &#039;equals&#039; men &#039;needed&#039; for some mutual vibe—they were commodities, yes, traded, sold, lobotomized when they got uppity, because nature doesn&#039;t run on Frankfurt School therapy sessions or democratic fairy tales. Men &#039;needed&#039; one like they need a warhorse or gold: for heirs, labor division (dimorphism is real, cope), social status, and keeping the bloodline strong. But it was ownership, pure hierarchy—vital force commanding the vessel of the species-genius (women live for reproduction and beauty in their blood, not neurotic desk copies of gay bugmen).You think that&#039;s worse than now? Feminism &#039;freed&#039; women to serve CEOs for pennies in the rat race, handed power to financiers/lawyers who pimp wives/daughters while the longhouse smothered real male vitality. Both sexes lost: men neutered into providers without command, women botched into grinds without instinct. Nature laughs—epigenetics, hormones, sexual dimorphism don&#039;t care about your &#039;interesting times&#039; egalitarianism. We&#039;re animals, not blank slates.So no, men never &#039;needed&#039; women as equals—that&#039;s the modern lie. They commanded them, and society thrived on that fire. Now? Everyone&#039;s a peon in the gynocracy.&quot;That&#039;s what every woman is thinking and why so many of them work so hard.&quot; - pentoWhat makes you think you know every woman?Here are some fun reading points that I know you won&#039;t. ( 2025-2026 reports, McKinsey, Catalyst, BLS, ILO, etc)[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.inclusiongeeks.com/women-in-the-workplace-2025-meets-the-world-inequality-report-2026/#:~:text=Women%20work%20more%20hours%20than,work%E2%80%9D%20in%20the%20first%20place.[/URL][URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://wfrn.org/research/women-exiting-workforce-at-record-pace-new-catalyst-data-reveals-why/#:~:text=Citation:,decisions%20to%20exit%20the%20workforce.[/URL]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Schwarzwald, post: 66868, member: 544"] Before the feminist infection, women weren't 'equals' men 'needed' for some mutual vibe—they were commodities, yes, traded, sold, lobotomized when they got uppity, because nature doesn't run on Frankfurt School therapy sessions or democratic fairy tales. Men 'needed' one like they need a warhorse or gold: for heirs, labor division (dimorphism is real, cope), social status, and keeping the bloodline strong. But it was ownership, pure hierarchy—vital force commanding the vessel of the species-genius (women live for reproduction and beauty in their blood, not neurotic desk copies of gay bugmen). You think that's worse than now? Feminism 'freed' women to serve CEOs for pennies in the rat race, handed power to financiers/lawyers who pimp wives/daughters while the longhouse smothered real male vitality. Both sexes lost: men neutered into providers without command, women botched into grinds without instinct. Nature laughs—epigenetics, hormones, sexual dimorphism don't care about your 'interesting times' egalitarianism. We're animals, not blank slates. So no, men never 'needed' women as equals—that's the modern lie. They commanded them, and society thrived on that fire. Now? Everyone's a peon in the gynocracy. "That's what every woman is thinking and why so many of them work so hard." - pento What makes you think you know every woman? Here are some fun reading points that I know you won't. ( 2025-2026 reports, McKinsey, Catalyst, BLS, ILO, etc) [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.inclusiongeeks.com/women-in-the-workplace-2025-meets-the-world-inequality-report-2026/#:~:text=Women%20work%20more%20hours%20than,work%E2%80%9D%20in%20the%20first%20place.[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://wfrn.org/research/women-exiting-workforce-at-record-pace-new-catalyst-data-reveals-why/#:~:text=Citation:,decisions%20to%20exit%20the%20workforce.[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread