Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Schwarzwald" data-source="post: 66908" data-attributes="member: 544">gynocentric TED Talk from the OP.&nbsp; Women flooding college/STEM/white-collar mills? That&#039;s the longhouse bait—feminized schools reward bugman compliance, sit-still credentialism, not solar genius or raw strength. Women &quot;out-earn&quot; young men in some urban pockets? Cope. Overall mean/median earnings still skew male—men work more hours, take risk premiums, dominate high-variance extremes. Women spend on household/personal fluff, men on investments/cars/entertainment that build or display power. Acceleration to &quot;female-dominated&quot; society? It&#039;s speed-running decay—more HR bloat, feelings circles, agreeable fatties stifling innovation with process over conquest. Society gets weaker, sicker, fatter for it. Romans/Greeks knew: feminine/soft at the core = empire rot.Your mirror flips historical commodification of women onto low-status men—the extras who can&#039;t compete. Cull &#039;em for peace &amp; beauty? Brutal, but might makes right. Hierarchy is nature. The strong command, the weak get culled or redirected. And you know what in the end your half right, less feeders and eaters, full stop. The weak men and the fat worthless women are both dragging the same anchor: low vitality, high consumption, zero contribution. Fill the ranks with them and you get a society of slugs—everyone feeding off the strong while whining about &quot;equality&quot; and &quot;care labor.&quot; Nature doesn&#039;t negotiate with the weak. Hence women will never be in power like that it&#039;s a fever dream of a sad feminist. I know this shit reminded me of some dried up feminist, Julie Bindel, the dirty cunt. Go back to reading SCUM Manifesto and dreaming of a future that will never be, this world will end in nuclear fire before woman take over and we can thank the middle east for that glorious promise, Islam is right about women.&nbsp;الله أكبرRespectfully :3 xoxo</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Schwarzwald, post: 66908, member: 544"] gynocentric TED Talk from the OP. Women flooding college/STEM/white-collar mills? That's the longhouse bait—feminized schools reward bugman compliance, sit-still credentialism, not solar genius or raw strength. Women "out-earn" young men in some urban pockets? Cope. Overall mean/median earnings still skew male—men work more hours, take risk premiums, dominate high-variance extremes. Women spend on household/personal fluff, men on investments/cars/entertainment that build or display power. Acceleration to "female-dominated" society? It's speed-running decay—more HR bloat, feelings circles, agreeable fatties stifling innovation with process over conquest. Society gets weaker, sicker, fatter for it. Romans/Greeks knew: feminine/soft at the core = empire rot.Your mirror flips historical commodification of women onto low-status men—the extras who can't compete. Cull 'em for peace & beauty? Brutal, but might makes right. Hierarchy is nature. The strong command, the weak get culled or redirected. And you know what in the end your half right, less feeders and eaters, full stop. The weak men and the fat worthless women are both dragging the same anchor: low vitality, high consumption, zero contribution. Fill the ranks with them and you get a society of slugs—everyone feeding off the strong while whining about "equality" and "care labor." Nature doesn't negotiate with the weak. Hence women will never be in power like that it's a fever dream of a sad feminist. I know this shit reminded me of some dried up feminist, Julie Bindel, the dirty cunt. Go back to reading SCUM Manifesto and dreaming of a future that will never be, this world will end in nuclear fire before woman take over and we can thank the middle east for that glorious promise, Islam is right about women. الله أكبر Respectfully :3 xoxo [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread