Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pērkons šķīla u" data-source="post: 83106" data-attributes="member: 623">I mean that's the thing Jung even says this: "In both cases, however, intuition was subordinated to intellect, but with Nietzsche it ranked above it"do you expect someone like that to write anything intelligible. and obviously this is also what basically it means: since he tends to rely exclusively upon his vision, his moral effort becomes one-sided; he makes himself and his life symbolic, adapted, it is true, to the inner and eternal meaning of events, but unadapted to the actual present-day reality. Therewith he also deprives himself of any influence upon it, because he remains unintelligible. His language is not that which is commonly spoken -- it becomes too subjective. His argument lacks convincing reason. He can only confess or pronounce. His is the 'voice of one crying in the wilderness'.</blockquote>