No, different genders are better in different ways. Foids are socially superior to us they are using this to saturate society into being easily manipulated by emotional thinking. Men should identify what does not benefit from emotional thinking and gate keep women from that. Ufortunately they have legions of simps wont let that happen so might be mission impossible. Also lots of other things but this is step one
No, different genders are better in different ways. Foids are socially superior to us they are using this to saturate society into being easily manipulated by emotional thinking. Men should identify what does not benefit from emotional thinking and gate keep women from that. Ufortunately they have legions of simps wont let that happen so might be mission impossible. Also lots of other things but this is step one
Emotional Expression Over Stoicism: Post-World War II, especially since the 1960s, Western society started prizing emotional vulnerability. The "strong, silent type" archetype—think John Wayne—gave way to therapy culture, self-help books, and public figures openly crying (e.g., politicians like Bill Clinton tearing up in speeches). Media now celebrates men "in touch with their feelings"—think influencers like Brené Brown pushing vulnerability or ads showing dads nurturing kids over fixing cars.
Shift in Gender Roles: Women’s liberation and the push for equality flipped traditional setups. By 2020, women made up 47% of the U.S. workforce (Bureau of Labor Statistics) and outnumbered men in higher education (National Center for Education Statistics). Cultural icons reflect this—less Clint Eastwood, more Timothée Chalamet: softer, less imposing masculinity. Family dynamics shifted too—dual-income homes and stay-at-home dads (up 8% in the U.S. since 1989, per Pew) blur old lines.
Empathy in Policy and Discourse: Laws and social norms now lean hard into care and inclusion—hallmarks of "feminine" values. Think workplace harassment policies, maternity/paternity leave (e.g., Sweden’s 480-day parental leave split), or the rise of "safe spaces" on campuses. Public apologies are standard now—CEOs grovel on X after PR flops, a far cry from the unapologetic tycoons of the past.
Pop Culture Aesthetics: Music and film swapped grit for gloss. The 80s had Rambo; now it’s Harry Styles in pearls or Marvel heroes debating feelings mid-fight. Even sports—once a masculine bastion—pivoted: the NFL’s 2020 “Football is for Everyone” campaign nods to inclusivity over brute force.
Examples of "Over-Saturation" Causing Problems
Critics argue this shift’s gone too far, tipping balance into dysfunction. Here’s how:
Backlash to "Weakness": Some say feminization breeds fragility. Jordan Peterson’s rants about “chaos” from eroded masculinity resonate with young men flocking to his books—1.5 million copies of 12 Rules for Life sold by 2020. Incidents like the 2018 Gillette “toxic masculinity” ad sparked outrage (and a reported $8 billion brand value drop), with X posts calling it “man-hating” hitting viral status—suggesting a cultural recoil.
Polarization: Pushing empathy and softness alienated chunks of society. The rise of “alpha male” influencers—Andrew Tate got 11 billion TikTok views pre-ban—shows a hunger for old-school grit. Political splits widened too: U.S. men under 30 leaned 53% Republican in 2022 midterms (AP VoteCast), possibly rejecting "feminized" progressive ideals.
Over-Correction in Institutions: Critics point to education—boys lag in school (girls outperform in reading across OECD nations by 27 points, PISA 2018)—blaming "feminized" teaching styles favoring compliance over competition. Military recruitment’s another sore spot: U.S. Army missed goals by 15,000 in 2022, with some on X blaming “woke” ads featuring women and diversity over hardcore appeal.
Social Fatigue: The constant call for sensitivity’s exhausting, some say. Cancel culture—e.g., Kevin Hart losing his 2019 Oscars gig over old tweets—feels like feminized “feelings first” run amok. X threads bemoan “everyone’s offended,” suggesting a tipping point where empathy drowns dissent.
I would say it would be worse in some ends and better in others. For starters, the idea of guys betraying eachother and the falsehood of male brotherhood (if anyone here NT enough they'll know all the cringemaxxing things guys do in presence of a women as an attempt to seem more 'alpha' or 'masculine') would be gone as there no longer is the decisive factor that is guiding men into doing such things.
However, at the same time, most guys will just not really work together well with eachother without a stable goal (sex)... and if they can't have sex with women they're going to have sex with the most feminine thing they can find (like femboys). Overtime, if there is somehow a way for men to reproduce, it's going to form the same social landscape, just with feminine men at the top of the social food chain.
Not a yes but women especially as with many things are made to torture the soul in a covert wicked manner. A little bit of knowledge regarding earth being a hell realm/prison planet will elucidate this stance to the head scratching normie.
The pussy, mmmm pussy….. is shaped akin to a baphomet for whatever reason, why…..