Felt like I was pretty cordial. Didn't mean to upset you guys so much.
I am not upset at you, but I understand my language was a bit harsh. If that's how I come off, I will refrain. My fault on that.
So my logic was bullshit because I said something right but didn't go into more detail or paste a link to a paper.
No. You didn't simply say something right but "didn't go into more detail". You framed and made a clear point that:
Thinking 'i shouldn't be male' is a thought that comes from some kind of hurt or trauma. Even if you believe it, stick with me on the concept that you wouldn't have had to consider it without hurt or trauma. Consider then a hypothetical that shows up a lot: someone doing just fine in life who hates themselves and thinks badly of themselves. The traditional treatment is therapy or self reflection where you think through 'well if I factually think through things I'm doing just as well or better than other people, so why is my brain telling me I'm a piece of shit?' then the person is supposed to figure out 'oh yeah when I was an impressionable kid my parent did xyz to make me think I needed to be extremely successful or I'd be a disappointment. So I guess my self hatred is not based in reality and I should train myself to view things more factually.'
You made sure to frame it in the lenses of trauma and/or hurt. I said you were right about a specific thing, not that your framing was right. Your framing was wrong because it was too reductive, and I cited why. So your understanding is already faulty to begin with because it is based on the wrong premises.
I understand that it normally doesn't if it involves trying to deny gender.
What does this even mean? Feels like you are not making a point here. "Denying gender". The whole point of this is to attempt to find out if the person has gender dysphoria or not (through therapy), and THEN attempt to treat it OR redirect to another therapist if the problem is something else. There is no denial of gender here, because if they denied gender, then what are they even discussing here? Are we even talking about the same thing?
I'm sorry, and I do apologize. I should have made this more clear. When I said they go into the doctors office and are immediately given pills, I was exaggerating for effect. I see now that it was folly to think that would be evident.
I don't buy this tbh. You made a clear point and you went for a specific framing that treatment of gender dysphoria should be done through therapy while modern treatment of gender dysphoria was erroneously done through gender-affirming care. You weren't doing some "effect". You were just being wrong. But I accept your apology. At least you realize your approach was incorrect here.
I did then go search the underlying source for the underlying 41% number being discussed. What was shared with me was a screenshot of a chart of ratios with no source or raw data.
Okay, let's address this unfortunately high number of suicidal ideation in trans folks.
Suicidal ideation, in research, is a more critical construct for its predictive power for suicidal attempts.
It is also unfortunately the case that research on suicide risk among trans folks is meager as one brief literature review article comments:
Transgender individuals are at increased risk for suicide relative to nontransgender people. Despite this, research on transgender people's risk for suicide mirrors their marginalization at the societal level; there is simply not enough research dedicated to understanding increased suicide risk among transgender people.
Source:
Suicide Risk Among Transgender People: A Prevalent Problem in Critical Need of Empirical and Theoretical Research
However, there is still research. One research study shows an interesting finding:
Violence, discrimination, and transition status significantly predicted SI. Compared with individuals with no plans to transition, individuals with plans or who were living as their identified gender reported greater odds of lifetime SI.
Source:
Predictors of Suicidal Ideation in a Statewide Sample of Transgender Individuals
The same study proposes this explanation:
Trans individuals who were planning to transition, or who had already engaged in the transition process, were significantly more likely to report lifetime SI compared with those with no transition plans. However, because we did not collect data on the timing of SI, the temporal associations are unknown. There are a few possible explanations for these associations. One possibility is that transitioning might be related to more frequent experiences of marginalization and thus elevated levels of stress.
Also, to credit
@GripMaxxing, the study DOES affirm there are higher SI in FtM individuals than MtF:
Notably, FTM participants were significantly more likely to report experiences of victimization and lifetime SI than MTF participants.
The statistics is in the paper, by the way. The statistics is presented in a table so I didn't bother copying it here since it would take too much space.
I would get into the discussion and the theoretical perspectives that the literature review article provided but I feel this is getting too lengthy and I am afraid I am putting too much effort for someone that, at least in my opinion, does not show much enthusiasm in actually engaging with this. So instead, I will dump this part because it addresses something you said earlier:
We talk about how trans commit suicide so much, and often the reason given from trans activists is that they aren't able to be "themselves." Problem is that even when they get the transition surgery the suicide rate stays the same, so getting the "confirmation" doesn't help. Which makes sense.
But the brief literature review article says:
Individual factors that are potentially protective against suicide ideation include perceived coping abilities, optimism, gender identity acceptance and disclosure, and reasons for living (Moody and Smith
2013; Moody et al.
2015; Testa et al.
2017).
This is in the "Correlates of suicide ideation".
Now, "potentially" does some lifting there, I admit, but you can now see why people not being "themselves" is not enough. It's not JUST the confirmation, but also the discrimination and violence they experience as a result of transitioning. The statement above shows that "gender identity acceptance and disclosure" is a potentially protective factor against suicidal ideation, and THAT makes sense.
Edit: forget to add a little tidbit addressing another point you made