I kind of felt some accelerationist vibes when I had the Mishima argument (
first post in the San Diego thread and the
first post in the Basilisk thread), Mishima's far-right and Evola was referenced.
TLDR:
My point in the argument was that Mishima already wanted to die so he created his own struggle to die in so it doesn't really count towards the message. That argument ended with an agreement to disagree.
I think accelerationism is a vibe for people that don't like the status quo and not really a well thought out movement. You create chaos, and then what? An Arab style dictatorship? 20 militant movements and a McBallPit?