- Joined
- Dec 12, 2025
- Messages
- 157
- Thread Author
- #1
And if so why or why not ?
Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Which layout option do you want to use?
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
I'm going to reject this belief because it hurts my feelings and makes people less morally accountable.
You have to prove things, in science, not just put a theory out there and let everyone else go to prove it.
I DINDU NUFFIN!
Anecdote.
Yes, because our existence is backed with billions of years of evolution, and all of our predecessors were animals.
Theory is not just conjecture, for something to become a scientific theory, it has to essentially have abundant and near-irrefutable evidence to support it. The only reason why it's not called a 'scientific fact' is because in science, you're encouraged to question everything and not assume you're right all the time, it'd be beneficial if religious people had the same perspective...
that's why evolution is not a theory, it's a conjecture.
Nigger
Looks like half of Chicago jfl
Simaler but still very different at the same time evolutionists miss that different part and only focus on the similarities.
Micro evolution is testable and provable macro evolution isn't which is why they keep using ridiculous time frames to justify macro evolution.
You are encouraged to question everything except macro evolution.
No proof for any origin claims that you made all you presented was a speculative story about how we might have originated.
How about the fossils, the evidence of element/compound levels changing in the past due to certain creatures, CMB radiation, etc?
