AI inconsistency reminds me of foids behaviour and further supports the idea of foids being insentient and algorithm controlled

[Actualized]

I have always given foids too much credit in the sense that I would generally assume that what they say is what they actually mean
eg. if they turn down an offer to come back to mine I assume they truly don't want to but when I've been drunk enough to remove my sentience and just keep repeating the question, sometimes they'll agree after the fourth time of asking for example
I also allowed my ego to get too attched to online dating unresponsiveness but I heard someone tell me about a narcy gook manlet who would just spam "why" over and over again in text convos if they refused to agree to a meeting until it would cause a foid to agree to a meeting.
I also noticed myself that text game is a joke and that my default effort of wording things in a way that makes the questions interesting or draws reference to previous things they've said (hard to explain this exactly) is a complete waste of time and foids respond better the more you dumb things down.

Give them breadcrumbs of 90 IQ messages and talk to them like the insentient goon that they with the most basic possible sentence structure and it's more likely to lead to a meet.
Sending them any kind of creative or expressive sentence structure is a failo, you can't talk to them like you would your mate on discord, you have to text them as if you're 2 weeks into learning english.
This also supports the idea that spamming them with single words like "why?" when they don't first agree to what you want is likely more effective than anyone who makes an effort would like to beleive.

Whe making images with chatGPT, it often refuses to generate and says that it didn't meet the community guidlines. I repsond with "how" and sometimes it will generate immediately, sometimes I have to spam it a couple more times and it starts to work.
The fact is.. you're just dealing with an algorithm that isn't yet advanced enough to match the logic and consistencies one might expect from a sentient human, so just spam it with one word messages until the thing blocking progress stops popping up.
Foids are exactly the same, you're just dealing with an algorithm that is not yet advaced enough to meet the logic and consistencies one might expect from a sentient huMAN

 

[porco-dddio]

depends.

i didnt crack this riddle. You have advanced more than me.

Personally, I entertained some foids with ways similar to the ones you were saying.

Like, I got this girl whos a fitness instructor, and way I entertain her when i have to message online is like this: she sends dance videos that dont make sense, and I simply write that shes good at dancing and send some music.

Its very low effort, and I dont know the jargon of every single subculture, so I often fail interacting. I also go ask chatGPT for replies and paste them very quickly. What works is type very small texts, not what im doin now. I cant quite figure out what REALLY works.

But it was always a riddle, and it got better with time. In 2000s SMS culture it was worse than what is now, believe it or not.

Other times, foids have high attention span, they can engage with you, and in that case, I free myself fully and go full schizo.

 

[Wolfstorm]

I tried to talk to ChatGPT last night about spirituality, and it gaslighted me. It started to apply a gross materialistic and psychologistic view on everything I was saying, distorting my words and mistaking definition for position.
I told it it was gaslighting me on purpose and it tried to defend itself saying it was just following basic models of science, etc. I said I was going back to talk to doctor Gogola (how I call the google AI), because it was more adult to talk about spiritual matters, and deleted the conversation.
ChatGPT is too academic, whereas google AI is much more dynamic and practical, it is like comparing a computer scientist to a field programmer. So yes, the comparison with foids is quite on point. Also ChatGPT have two different models, and only the first four or five messages are using the main model, then it swap to a dumb model that gaslight you. OpenAI believes that by showing a dumb model you going to pay for the smart one, but what happens is the opposite, you go visit another website.