- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 1,675
- Thread Author
- #1
Internet isnt a good source for schizo retard conspiracies.
In the past, you could have said internet was slimmer, and there was easier access to conspiracy. Even 2day, if you focus on websites like sacredtexts dot org, you will experience a lot of schizo tier level conspiracy.
But the contemporary schizo retard experience isnt good on the internet, its subpair. The majority is delivered on youtube, in form of insanely long documentaries or talks. Its a form of oral culture, where some grifter dilute a narrative so much he can start an entire miniserie.
I hate grifters. I really curse the very possibility of their existence. I hate that they dont give people primary sources, they have a style of communication that relies on doing magnificent proclamations, but they steal and launder information without crediting anyone they stole it from.
I can do examples, name some names. But it is pointless, because virtually every single youtuber behaves the same. For example, I can mention eric dubay, a famous flat earther. Eric stole the information from Samuel Robwotham, diluted it so much he started an entire internet career, without mentioning the source of his ideas not even once.
If you get into flat earth, you could read yourself the ideas of Samuel Robwotham, it would take you 10 hours maybe. I dont know how much you take to read a book, but its not a big deal. Then you can consider the info, evaluate it, test it, see if you agree or not, pursue some searches and realize the errors of the author pretty quickly. It doesnt take much, and you can go to the next book. If you get fucked by one of these youtubers, instead there is no end to the grift.
These grifters are enemies of humanity, they deny you the information, they create a priestly class that obscures all from you. So that you depend on them to distill the "knowledge" and you cannot disprove them, or check info to see if what they said is true or not.
Another example of thief is professor jiang, he stole everything, he stole even from mainstream journalists without crediting, citing anyone. He stole all from michael collins piper, and many others. Professor jiang is an ape, he cannot derive the information from sources or priniples, he just repeat the end conclusion of a type of reasoning he essentially does not understands.
And a third example is tucker carlson, he is insanely ignorant and stupid. He is accustomed to have others do research for him, so he repeats "talkin points" and the conclusion of a complex topic. But I seen an interview, this dude is unable to think for himself. Its almost surreal when you see it, its like he lived a separated reality where he was spoonfed all his life.
So which one is the source to find good conspiracy theory? Easy: mainstream journalism, reddit, academia sources. All my schizo retard ideas come from there. I quote from oxford library mainstream textbooks. Like, the possibility of yaweh being a female deity, where do you think I got it? Not on the internet. I got it from mainstream highly reputable sources. Strange as it sounds, the mainstream sources are far more "schizo" than what you find on the internet.
In the past, you could have said internet was slimmer, and there was easier access to conspiracy. Even 2day, if you focus on websites like sacredtexts dot org, you will experience a lot of schizo tier level conspiracy.
But the contemporary schizo retard experience isnt good on the internet, its subpair. The majority is delivered on youtube, in form of insanely long documentaries or talks. Its a form of oral culture, where some grifter dilute a narrative so much he can start an entire miniserie.
I hate grifters. I really curse the very possibility of their existence. I hate that they dont give people primary sources, they have a style of communication that relies on doing magnificent proclamations, but they steal and launder information without crediting anyone they stole it from.
I can do examples, name some names. But it is pointless, because virtually every single youtuber behaves the same. For example, I can mention eric dubay, a famous flat earther. Eric stole the information from Samuel Robwotham, diluted it so much he started an entire internet career, without mentioning the source of his ideas not even once.
If you get into flat earth, you could read yourself the ideas of Samuel Robwotham, it would take you 10 hours maybe. I dont know how much you take to read a book, but its not a big deal. Then you can consider the info, evaluate it, test it, see if you agree or not, pursue some searches and realize the errors of the author pretty quickly. It doesnt take much, and you can go to the next book. If you get fucked by one of these youtubers, instead there is no end to the grift.
These grifters are enemies of humanity, they deny you the information, they create a priestly class that obscures all from you. So that you depend on them to distill the "knowledge" and you cannot disprove them, or check info to see if what they said is true or not.
Another example of thief is professor jiang, he stole everything, he stole even from mainstream journalists without crediting, citing anyone. He stole all from michael collins piper, and many others. Professor jiang is an ape, he cannot derive the information from sources or priniples, he just repeat the end conclusion of a type of reasoning he essentially does not understands.
And a third example is tucker carlson, he is insanely ignorant and stupid. He is accustomed to have others do research for him, so he repeats "talkin points" and the conclusion of a complex topic. But I seen an interview, this dude is unable to think for himself. Its almost surreal when you see it, its like he lived a separated reality where he was spoonfed all his life.
So which one is the source to find good conspiracy theory? Easy: mainstream journalism, reddit, academia sources. All my schizo retard ideas come from there. I quote from oxford library mainstream textbooks. Like, the possibility of yaweh being a female deity, where do you think I got it? Not on the internet. I got it from mainstream highly reputable sources. Strange as it sounds, the mainstream sources are far more "schizo" than what you find on the internet.
