Essay Blackpill is neither Red nor Blue

[Depresso]

Black ain’t no color like blue or red — it’s what you get when there’s almost no light reflectin’ back to yo’ eye. Blue and red are specific wavelengths of light; when they hit your eye, your brain says “that’s blue” or “that’s red.” Black happen when them wavelengths ain’t hittin’ your eye much at all, so there ain’t no colour signal for your brain to pick up.

Now, you can take blue or red and make ’em darker by takin’ away light or mixin’ in darker pigments. If you keep takin’ light away, that blue or red look weaker and weaker until it look like black to you — ’cause there ain’t enough light leavin’ the surface to tell your brain it’s blue or red no more.

 

[Depresso]

In English: Blackpill can't be red or blue because it's not a colour. You can turn either pill darker until you arrive at black.

 

[porco-dddio]

Its very simple.

Redpill-Bluepill is about reconciliation of opposites. R⊥B is an invertible system where the 2 ends are opposite.

So far is simple but if you want to I can complicate it. I mean I am prepared to overcomplicate simple ideas like 2+2=4, I can do it. Also I know some people are seeking depth and profundity, so they are not content if you say 2+2=4. So if you want to, I can write 3 or 4 pages length essays where all im saying is 2+2=4.

The idea does not have to be so hard to grasp, it can be intuitive as well.

Now, the idea of Paragon is also equivalently as simple. Red and Blue are false. Simple as. So blackpill implies you do not perform the operations, because you acknowledge both realities are fake.

B = bluepill world
R = redpill world

Assumes both are existing states, and you can do all the transformations using this magic system like normies in public discourse do all the time. You can choose between them, by inverting one or the other. The higher-tier magicians use the normies to pursue the transmutation of symbols so they achieve a reconciliation.

This system is like goetia left hand right hand, or the kabbalah. Public discourse is all based on magical transmutation.

This is the blackpill ¬(B∪R) Meaning neither state is accepted as ontologically valid. No valid operation exists. End of the system. Its as simple as that. But if you want I can complicate it much more, and I can go into all the magical transmutations you can do with a bijective system with obstruction that red vs blue grants you.

I think red vs blue gives you false powers, you will somehow transmute reality up to a point, and is the reason some people use it because theyre fascinated witht the lesser powers they are given. But there are more powerful magical systems out there, and I dont feel like following kabbalah red vs blue.

 

[porco-dddio]

Also, I dont think blackpill has to deny the existence of a formal system. Like, any invertible reality can exist as a math construct. All you do is deny their ontological privilege.

Because Redpill exists as symbols and magic spells cast on the peoples. Bluepill exists and is a narrative machine. And they can be coherently mapped and the inversion can be done. So whoever performs invertion achieves results in real life. You will see it yourself, any magician using this system will achieve results. Alex jones for example performed inversion, framed "the globalist democrat", achieved results.

A system like red vs blue is hard to tackle because it can be coherent, you can invert it and you can achieve power in society, you can frame it mathematically and it shows to be usable, it has widely accepted symbols anyone can use.

But I refuse to use it anyway. No idea about you. I mean, my motivation is that I dont want to live in the mind of yaweh. And as for now I can only use my D&D beginner spellcaster list of formulas. I am very unimpressive compared to magicians like alex jones. But doesnt means I have to lose. One day maybe I will bamboozle you, with some massive magical spell and you will see blackpill makes total sense. For now im appealing to reason, like a faggot who has no real power.