- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 1,396
- Thread Author
- #1
Before the "trad and based" christian influencer scene started their grift narrating the present social mythology there was the grift of "the sexual revolution".
Here previous thread: https://elysianfields.se/threads/christian-grifters-and-their-hypergamy-con-artist-model.9439/
I dont even know if you are aware of "the sexual revolution". Because most young people missed it. I am 34 right now and I missed the sexual revolution as well, but I was alive when it was ending. I also already obtained my rational faculties so I was able to observe and judge it.
Our rational faculties do not come all in 1 single instant, its not that if you turn 18 you become a rational moral agent instantly. It can be you obtain your mental powers earlier or later. In my case I was fully capable to see the end of that "sexual revolution" because I had the rational mind already sufficiently activated.
During the 90s it was the peak of the sexual revolution grift. The premise was built during 1960-70.
Step 1, the communist grifters successfully defined "the enemy" as the capitalism. The commies also used a jargon almost equivalent compared to the christian grifters of today. They used the word "alpha" to describe wealthy individuals who were able to obtain more sex, by virtue of being rich. Moneyed individual was seen as a scammer who exploits the system to get pussy.
Examples of this brand of communism can be found today for example the beta male movement. And promale collective is also heavy communist and uses a similar grift. The grift is over. Theres very few commies who remember it, they are old for the most part.
Step 2 the slander of "unenlightened women".
If a woman chose a wealthy, powerful, or an attractive man, the communist grifter could not admit that human desire is complex. Instead, they weaponized ideological slander. They were engaged in reframing human desire in communist terms, mostly to ashame women and oftentimes also men.
Women were slandered as shallow, less intelligent, and spiritually stunted by capitalist consumerism. Instead the communist male was raised and considered "truly enlightened" because he I loved your post marx believed deeply in it.
A woman who was "a comrade" would reject material security and a good life, and choose men based on "shared ideological purity". Ideology is above reality in their slandering jargon.
Step 3 offer "the deal". This is where the grift becomes specific and transactional, utilizing cultural proxies like the "marijuana smoking woman" or the "counter culture radical."
Most grifts are based on offering a deal. In this case, grifters sold young men on a simple equation: bourgeois women are out of your league, but liberated, left women are "openminded". I have a personal exp with this grift, and I didnt mine it from blogs, I lived it. I was offered this bargain by the culture I was living in, during the last decaying stage of the grift.
Older communists failed to transfer the values of their communist terminology. I as a youngman (at the time) refused to be conned into communist obedience... Little did I know I was simply opening the road for a second grift.
The audience was told that if they adopted the aesthetic xample attended the protests, frequented the squats, smoked marijuana, and recited the correct psychological and political jargon, they would be rewarded with easy and liberated sex. Communism was sold not as workers movement, but as a sexual vending machine "dating agency".
This is also the age where students too over. And student protest culture evolved from this split in communist propaganda. Nowadays you see workers are ostracized in the communist collectives. But it happened gradually... because commies adopted specific grifts targeting teenagers the most.
Step 4: The Psychology Priesthood (The moral Enforcers)
In this era, therapy culture and secular psychology were heavily intertwined with "progressive" politics. If a young man was lonely or rejected, the "priesthood" didn't tell him to improve his fitness, career, or social skills. They told him he needed to "deconstruct his bourgeois programming" or fix his "toxic attachment to traditional masculinity"
Now, this is still alive today, but less prevalent. There were movements like "new masculinity", and in my country (italy) there is also a false incel movement led by a communist infiltrator state propagandist called Marco Crepaldi. You can google it if you dont believe me. Other than this movement, the feminists also famously organized the spreading of redpill contents during the late 90s. The idea was teaching men to "interpret woman signals". This feminist movement was later grifted by the PUA community.
The moral authority came mostly from "priests of the state" the psychologists.
Now, unlike the christian grift, the communist one had less flaws. The christian grift is reliant on the attention economy and can run indefinitely if men are made anxious artificially. Christian grift has to fuel hatred to stay alive.
This communist grift instead was more powerful, because it was also partially working. Not for me, im incel. The grift had to fail and collapse to be exposed, so during the late 2000s and early 2010s, the model completely ran out of gas for a few undeniable reasons:
- The reality of mate selection. Science studied what is attractive. Young men who spent years pretending to be harmless, egalitarian "beta comrades" realized that spamming leftwing jargon did not magically make them attractive. Women in liberated spaces still did the same thing they always did everywhere else, choosing men based on chad-esque facial features, confidence, popularity in the grift, or criminality, not Marxist theory. Nobody was reading marxist theory.
- Dating apps. Criticized by christian grifters as well, but the dating apps mostly went in favor of christian "trad and based" model of grift. Because dating stripped away the ideological filters. Dating became based solely on attraction and hyperefficient as well so people less attractive were eliminated. The illusion that you could bypass physical or social competition by hanging out at counterculture collectives evaporated.
- Intersectional feminism killed it. The leftwing discourse evolved. The focus shifted away from "free love for everyone" toward consent, boundaries, and dismantling male entitlement within leftist spaces. Rightwing incels only heard 1/100th of what was the antimale shaming, because feminists attacked the most the men who were listening to them. Communist incels were berated, slandered, their identity was called into question daily. Right wing incels only know a minuscule part of this story. Who really suffered were the grifted commies.
When the communist sex grift died around 2010, it left behind a massive demographic of bitter, resentful men who felt lied to by the "priests of the state." It opened the door for the second grift.
Lets do a small comparison between christian and communist grift. The Leftist sex grift wasn’t built on a single pillar like the christian one (hypergamy theory). I think the commy grift relied on an entire culture full of psychological theories and economy theories. All the communist theories had to be true at the same time for the grift to continue.
The core theory of communists was social construction. The belief human beings are blank slate (tabula rasa) and culture makes us do what we do. Everything is learned behavior, including jealousy which was said to be manufactured by capitalism "On purpose". This is bat dung, and even in the 90s there were theories on human emotions showing some emotions are innate.
Communism became soon much more "pure and romantic" than the contemporary dream of the tradwife. They said if you strip away all capitalist "greed". Then you obtain pure human desire that is intellectual, egalitarian, spiritual, enlightened and creates harmony and peace and great sex.
And... this achieves the classless utopia. Sexual desire will redistribute itself "automatically", removing the concept of "be rejected" or "forced to compete". Science destroyed communism. But science did not destroy the christian grift.
Because christian grift is structurally held in place by 1 single pilar. Christian grift can harmonize all science, because they simply hijack all science. When the Christian grifter looks at evolutionary psychology and the "rules of attraction," they don't fight it. They say: "Look! Science proves women are driven by harsh, hypergamous biological instincts! Science proves nature is ruthless!"
The christian can resurrect scripts like "nature vs ethics". And its not even their main rhetorical strength, they can do more than that. The more decline and despair there is, the stronger the christian grifter becomes. Utopian thinking comes in times of material wealth, christians know this very deeply.
Here previous thread: https://elysianfields.se/threads/christian-grifters-and-their-hypergamy-con-artist-model.9439/
I dont even know if you are aware of "the sexual revolution". Because most young people missed it. I am 34 right now and I missed the sexual revolution as well, but I was alive when it was ending. I also already obtained my rational faculties so I was able to observe and judge it.
Our rational faculties do not come all in 1 single instant, its not that if you turn 18 you become a rational moral agent instantly. It can be you obtain your mental powers earlier or later. In my case I was fully capable to see the end of that "sexual revolution" because I had the rational mind already sufficiently activated.
During the 90s it was the peak of the sexual revolution grift. The premise was built during 1960-70.
Step 1, the communist grifters successfully defined "the enemy" as the capitalism. The commies also used a jargon almost equivalent compared to the christian grifters of today. They used the word "alpha" to describe wealthy individuals who were able to obtain more sex, by virtue of being rich. Moneyed individual was seen as a scammer who exploits the system to get pussy.
Examples of this brand of communism can be found today for example the beta male movement. And promale collective is also heavy communist and uses a similar grift. The grift is over. Theres very few commies who remember it, they are old for the most part.
Step 2 the slander of "unenlightened women".
If a woman chose a wealthy, powerful, or an attractive man, the communist grifter could not admit that human desire is complex. Instead, they weaponized ideological slander. They were engaged in reframing human desire in communist terms, mostly to ashame women and oftentimes also men.
Women were slandered as shallow, less intelligent, and spiritually stunted by capitalist consumerism. Instead the communist male was raised and considered "truly enlightened" because he I loved your post marx believed deeply in it.
A woman who was "a comrade" would reject material security and a good life, and choose men based on "shared ideological purity". Ideology is above reality in their slandering jargon.
Step 3 offer "the deal". This is where the grift becomes specific and transactional, utilizing cultural proxies like the "marijuana smoking woman" or the "counter culture radical."
Most grifts are based on offering a deal. In this case, grifters sold young men on a simple equation: bourgeois women are out of your league, but liberated, left women are "openminded". I have a personal exp with this grift, and I didnt mine it from blogs, I lived it. I was offered this bargain by the culture I was living in, during the last decaying stage of the grift.
Older communists failed to transfer the values of their communist terminology. I as a youngman (at the time) refused to be conned into communist obedience... Little did I know I was simply opening the road for a second grift.
The audience was told that if they adopted the aesthetic xample attended the protests, frequented the squats, smoked marijuana, and recited the correct psychological and political jargon, they would be rewarded with easy and liberated sex. Communism was sold not as workers movement, but as a sexual vending machine "dating agency".
This is also the age where students too over. And student protest culture evolved from this split in communist propaganda. Nowadays you see workers are ostracized in the communist collectives. But it happened gradually... because commies adopted specific grifts targeting teenagers the most.
Step 4: The Psychology Priesthood (The moral Enforcers)
In this era, therapy culture and secular psychology were heavily intertwined with "progressive" politics. If a young man was lonely or rejected, the "priesthood" didn't tell him to improve his fitness, career, or social skills. They told him he needed to "deconstruct his bourgeois programming" or fix his "toxic attachment to traditional masculinity"
Now, this is still alive today, but less prevalent. There were movements like "new masculinity", and in my country (italy) there is also a false incel movement led by a communist infiltrator state propagandist called Marco Crepaldi. You can google it if you dont believe me. Other than this movement, the feminists also famously organized the spreading of redpill contents during the late 90s. The idea was teaching men to "interpret woman signals". This feminist movement was later grifted by the PUA community.
The moral authority came mostly from "priests of the state" the psychologists.
Now, unlike the christian grift, the communist one had less flaws. The christian grift is reliant on the attention economy and can run indefinitely if men are made anxious artificially. Christian grift has to fuel hatred to stay alive.
This communist grift instead was more powerful, because it was also partially working. Not for me, im incel. The grift had to fail and collapse to be exposed, so during the late 2000s and early 2010s, the model completely ran out of gas for a few undeniable reasons:
- The reality of mate selection. Science studied what is attractive. Young men who spent years pretending to be harmless, egalitarian "beta comrades" realized that spamming leftwing jargon did not magically make them attractive. Women in liberated spaces still did the same thing they always did everywhere else, choosing men based on chad-esque facial features, confidence, popularity in the grift, or criminality, not Marxist theory. Nobody was reading marxist theory.
- Dating apps. Criticized by christian grifters as well, but the dating apps mostly went in favor of christian "trad and based" model of grift. Because dating stripped away the ideological filters. Dating became based solely on attraction and hyperefficient as well so people less attractive were eliminated. The illusion that you could bypass physical or social competition by hanging out at counterculture collectives evaporated.
- Intersectional feminism killed it. The leftwing discourse evolved. The focus shifted away from "free love for everyone" toward consent, boundaries, and dismantling male entitlement within leftist spaces. Rightwing incels only heard 1/100th of what was the antimale shaming, because feminists attacked the most the men who were listening to them. Communist incels were berated, slandered, their identity was called into question daily. Right wing incels only know a minuscule part of this story. Who really suffered were the grifted commies.
When the communist sex grift died around 2010, it left behind a massive demographic of bitter, resentful men who felt lied to by the "priests of the state." It opened the door for the second grift.
Lets do a small comparison between christian and communist grift. The Leftist sex grift wasn’t built on a single pillar like the christian one (hypergamy theory). I think the commy grift relied on an entire culture full of psychological theories and economy theories. All the communist theories had to be true at the same time for the grift to continue.
The core theory of communists was social construction. The belief human beings are blank slate (tabula rasa) and culture makes us do what we do. Everything is learned behavior, including jealousy which was said to be manufactured by capitalism "On purpose". This is bat dung, and even in the 90s there were theories on human emotions showing some emotions are innate.
Communism became soon much more "pure and romantic" than the contemporary dream of the tradwife. They said if you strip away all capitalist "greed". Then you obtain pure human desire that is intellectual, egalitarian, spiritual, enlightened and creates harmony and peace and great sex.
And... this achieves the classless utopia. Sexual desire will redistribute itself "automatically", removing the concept of "be rejected" or "forced to compete". Science destroyed communism. But science did not destroy the christian grift.
Because christian grift is structurally held in place by 1 single pilar. Christian grift can harmonize all science, because they simply hijack all science. When the Christian grifter looks at evolutionary psychology and the "rules of attraction," they don't fight it. They say: "Look! Science proves women are driven by harsh, hypergamous biological instincts! Science proves nature is ruthless!"
The christian can resurrect scripts like "nature vs ethics". And its not even their main rhetorical strength, they can do more than that. The more decline and despair there is, the stronger the christian grifter becomes. Utopian thinking comes in times of material wealth, christians know this very deeply.