Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wait whattt? :o" data-source="post: 75794" data-attributes="member: 564">It seems you don&#039;t understand the point that I am trying to make here.Let me try to explain this more clearly. An ethnocracy is essentially:Source: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnocracy" target="_blank">Ethnocracy - Wikipedia</a>An ethnostate, like Israel, which is structurally an ethnocracy, would purport that the ruling ethnicity must have dominance legally, resourcefully, and demographically over the ethnic minority. I am not saying they would be &quot;second-class citizens&quot; in the sense they are poor and not children of billionaires as your retarded framing suggests, I mean they would have to literally be second-class citizens legally and structurally for ethnical primacy to be preserved. Otherwise, as I said, it would not be an ethnocracy nor an ethnostate in a meaningful sense. It is either this OR they have to surrender a piece of their land.Also, engage with what I am actually saying rather than making assumptions about who I am or making retarded framing that I didn&#039;t even suggest. You are an admin ffs, don&#039;t lower your dignity by coming off like a retard.You keep saying the Malagasy love colonialism, that they would have better life, and that they would happily subject themselves under ethnocratic rule where they are the ethnic minority OR that they would surrender a piece of their land.I will ask you yet again and I hope you give actually substantiated reasons for why you think that is the case.Why do you believe the Malagasy would willfully subject themselves under ethnocratic rule as an ethnic minority?Why do you believe the Malagasy would willfully surrender a piece of their land for the establishment of a Jewish ethnostate?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wait whattt? :o, post: 75794, member: 564"] It seems you don't understand the point that I am trying to make here. Let me try to explain this more clearly. An ethnocracy is essentially: Source: [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnocracy']Ethnocracy - Wikipedia[/URL] An ethnostate, like Israel, which is structurally an ethnocracy, would purport that the ruling ethnicity must have dominance legally, resourcefully, and demographically over the ethnic minority. I am not saying they would be "second-class citizens" in the sense they are poor and not children of billionaires as your retarded framing suggests, I mean they would have to [I]literally [/I]be second-class citizens legally and structurally for ethnical primacy to be preserved. Otherwise, as I said, it would not be an ethnocracy nor an ethnostate in a meaningful sense. It is either [I]this[/I] OR they have to surrender a piece of their land. Also, engage with what I am actually saying rather than making assumptions about who I am or making retarded framing that I didn't even suggest. You are an admin ffs, don't lower your dignity by coming off like a retard. You keep saying the Malagasy love colonialism, that they would have better life, and that they would happily subject themselves under ethnocratic rule where they are the [I]ethnic minority [/I]OR that they would surrender a piece of their land. I will ask you yet again and I hope you give actually substantiated reasons for why you think that is the case. Why do you believe the Malagasy would willfully subject themselves under ethnocratic rule as an ethnic minority? Why do you believe the Malagasy would willfully surrender a piece of their land for the establishment of a Jewish ethnostate? [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread