- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 1,282
- Thread Author
- #1
I think dannunzio is true and demonstrable. You can pick examples and you can also derive practical philosophy, step by step instructions and you can use it in your life or observe it in the material world.
So for example, I can say peggy guggenheim is the superuomo. Its demonstrable because aesthetic elites exist and can be found in our everyday life.
ubermensch is psychological babble instead. Undemonstrable, vague, personal. I think is supposed to be this way, bcause nietzsche imagined some anti-conformist that is "ultimate man". But can a human like that even exist? American literature experiment says no. Even if youre rich asf and you dedicate to build your own personality, you would require severe genes editing to become something other than a human, to fulfill that anti-conformity goal.
Hitler or alexander or anyone else they say called "anti-conformist" is nonsense. Like, hitler didnt invent new values, I think he used values existing around him and I dont think he invented anything TBH. Alexander was a freak into military adventurism. And napoleon too acted on a plan. You have to also consider conspiracy theories when doing personality cults.
In a nutshell everyone fails the ubermensch test, simply because in essence is simply psychological babble. This is also why nietzsche is mainly preserved by christian apologists. Nobody else has an interest in preserving nietzsche. Philosophers usually hate him because is a pain in the ass to deal with sophistry and psychological babble.
I hate nietzsche too, bcause I realize hes very good at sophistry, at writing words that sound cool, and hes good at rhetoric and making big proclamations that seem true but they arent. I realize I cannot compete with poetry and his sophistry. Its like tryin to compete against obama when he says things that are "Inspiring" or some teenager pop idol that has people bamboozled with some "meaning of life". You cant do crap, which is why philosophers hate nietzsche and get very angry when hes mentioned.
Its impossible to defeat a sophist piece of trash. I mean you can "break his model" fairly easily, but you cant have the masses debrainwashed. And the masses always grovel at the feet of the generic scammer, like nietzsche, like buddha, like jewsus. And you cant do crap about it. The power of a con artist is 99% to blame on normies.
Christians instead love nietzsche, because they can use him. They can lead people (with the same nietzsche sophistry) to conclude artificially that christianity is the solution to everything. In other words they present to you a false problem, and offer a false "solution".
So for example, I can say peggy guggenheim is the superuomo. Its demonstrable because aesthetic elites exist and can be found in our everyday life.
ubermensch is psychological babble instead. Undemonstrable, vague, personal. I think is supposed to be this way, bcause nietzsche imagined some anti-conformist that is "ultimate man". But can a human like that even exist? American literature experiment says no. Even if youre rich asf and you dedicate to build your own personality, you would require severe genes editing to become something other than a human, to fulfill that anti-conformity goal.
Hitler or alexander or anyone else they say called "anti-conformist" is nonsense. Like, hitler didnt invent new values, I think he used values existing around him and I dont think he invented anything TBH. Alexander was a freak into military adventurism. And napoleon too acted on a plan. You have to also consider conspiracy theories when doing personality cults.
In a nutshell everyone fails the ubermensch test, simply because in essence is simply psychological babble. This is also why nietzsche is mainly preserved by christian apologists. Nobody else has an interest in preserving nietzsche. Philosophers usually hate him because is a pain in the ass to deal with sophistry and psychological babble.
I hate nietzsche too, bcause I realize hes very good at sophistry, at writing words that sound cool, and hes good at rhetoric and making big proclamations that seem true but they arent. I realize I cannot compete with poetry and his sophistry. Its like tryin to compete against obama when he says things that are "Inspiring" or some teenager pop idol that has people bamboozled with some "meaning of life". You cant do crap, which is why philosophers hate nietzsche and get very angry when hes mentioned.
Its impossible to defeat a sophist piece of trash. I mean you can "break his model" fairly easily, but you cant have the masses debrainwashed. And the masses always grovel at the feet of the generic scammer, like nietzsche, like buddha, like jewsus. And you cant do crap about it. The power of a con artist is 99% to blame on normies.
Christians instead love nietzsche, because they can use him. They can lead people (with the same nietzsche sophistry) to conclude artificially that christianity is the solution to everything. In other words they present to you a false problem, and offer a false "solution".
