Gallantry

[porco-dddio]

But dinosaurs are really fake, there are no dinosaur bones discovered before the 19th century. They were invented to replace dragons.
Just because you are a normie doesn't mean people should not question stuff. Even if you disagree let them do it.

100% im always open to new conspiracies. I just detest when people refuse to progress the discussion. I believe adults should talk whateve they want. If tomorrow I wake up and want to talk about "vaccines are fake" im gona do it. But doesnt means I have to believe it.

Also, yes I do think some conspiracies are dangerous. Namely flat earth and redpill.

Not because something inherent in flat earth or redpill, its simply a transgression on their part, they keep refusing to abide by rules of rational debate, which elicits a response. If they were able to dialog like normal people I wouldnt mind them too.

 

[porco-dddio]

You utterly lack self-awareness. You are a mentally damaged midget.

Please refrain from insults, they piss me off and I dont want to reply to you with other insults or we begin a chain. I will ignore this one. thanks.

 

[Wolfstorm]

I do believe waifuism is not a modern phenomenon. I think it is ancient and had different forms in myth and folklore.
If you check the historical record you will notice foids were always the same they are today, and only in some specific periods they did behave properly, because of moral codes introduced by men. And these moral codes started with men who were worshipping an ideal woman that was not present in daily reality. These men discovered their anima but by showing their art to more shallow men, had their myths used to create moral codes that were introduced to the meatholes. Thus the anima of inspired men was used, by way of religion, to indirectly tame the foid. But this had a bad consequence in the way it allowed for romanticism to grow. Romanticism took the meaning literally and applied it to every woman, even untamed ones. I see this as a cyclical recurrence that repeats over different civilizations. Probably also happened in Rome and Persia.

 

[Wolfstorm]

Please refrain from insults, they piss me off and I dont want to reply to you with other insults or we begin a chain. I will ignore this one. thanks.

Ok, chudite.

 

[Suigin Trismegistus]

No.

Anahita shares the same root word used for Amahita Muscaria or the Fly Agaric mushroom.

The ancient Persians would drink a psychedelic drink brewed from it to contact her.

Soma (drink) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334683063_Soma_and_Haoma_Ayahuasca_analogues_from_the_Late_Bronze_Age

 

[Wolfstorm]

100% im always open to new conspiracies.

But it is not a conspiracy, the entire stone age conundrum is fake. Sautuola faked the Altamira paintings.

 

[porco-dddio]

For example, flat earth violates any principle of rationality.

If I am allowed to use a source, whatever that is, then you should be allowed to use the same source. So we use same standard for determine what the fuck is true. If they say bible is authoritative, I can say ok. So they quote some selection of passages, they interpret it like shit, and they say god has made the earth flat like a pizza. Then I quote another passage helped by chatGPT and it says earth is a spinning ball and I use the same dishonest freedom to interpret it.

Another example. They reject NASA pics because "collage" or "NASA CGI". Fine, then why they use youtube videos as evidence?

If they say "you believe scientists are god", its another proof of their immorality and dishonesty. Theyre lucky god isnt real, because such immorality would make them burn in hell if god was a thing.

I do believe waifuism is not a modern phenomenon. I think it is ancient and had different forms in myth and folklore.

My incel thesis is we men invented women. I came up with it simply reading over 250 feminist books. I realized women do not exist. Womanhood is not real. I made it up.

Why? bcause in feminist writings they only say "this is not a woman". But they dont define it, and I realized they cant.

When matt walsh asks wht is a woman, he probably does not knows, he doesnt reads feminism because hes lowIQ, but he was focused on trannies and SJWs. Point being, there isnt an answer, only peterson in his documentary had it right. He said: marry and find out. WHich is true, even if peterson intends it like a conservative. All conservatives with an old timey mindset think that women are defined socially after mariage.

I lived in a conservative town, I knw this is true, they too taught me to never call "woman" any girl my age unmarried. So its a real thing, and peterson being slightly more educated than avg probably knows it. Instead I think matt walsh doesnt knows it.

 

[Suigin Trismegistus]

Please refrain from insults, they piss me off and I dont want to reply to you with other insults or we begin a chain. I will ignore this one. thanks.

Your weak deflection does not work on me. Your shrunken amygdala is evident to all. Your psyche is completely exposed. You are mental midget.

 

[Wolfstorm]

If I am allowed to use a source, whatever that is, then you should be allowed to use the same source.

Sources are questionable. Any document can be faked.
Tacitus, for instance, there are no original writings of him. They all came through Bracciolini, who was involved in several cases of forgery. The conclusion is that Tacitus was a character created by him.

 

[porco-dddio]

Your weak deflection does not work on me. Your shrunken amygdala is evident to all. Your psyche is completely exposed. You are mental midget.

View attachment 17947

Yes well, considering the source this type of slander comes from, I dont really care. I mean, most people who slander me calling me midwit or redditor usually are buffoons that got pissed off bcause I crapped on a cope from dissidoid media spaces like "accelerationism" or whatever I crapped on.

Which are you? I crapped on so many things I lost count. I crapped on critique of modernity, traditionalism, all the right wng, all their ideas, left none untouched. Probably I crapped on some of your darlings as well. Or you wouldnt slander me. In my internet exp is always like this, I get slandered when I touch the pile of stinkin cope of a dissidoid.

 

[porco-dddio]

Sources are questionable. Any document can be faked.
Tacitus, for instance, there are no original writings of him. They all came through Bracciolini, who was involved in several cases of forgery. The conclusion is that Tacitus was a character created by him.

Yes thats interesting, I heard it in conspiracies but I didnt really search this tacitus guy. I also heard plato was fake, and personally im convinced it can be. I mean, I wouldnt bet on it, but for what I read of plato, it could be plausible he never existed. I think he was a collction of writings of various immoral degenerates in his age, and they had to be crushed in bulk by superior thinkers later.

Other than that, whats probably 100% true is hermetes trismegistus is another fake. And also herodotus. I dont know how many other people are fake.

I presume lots in history is fake and fabrication.

 

[Suigin Trismegistus]

Yes well, considering the source this type of slander comes from, I dont really care. I mean, most people who slander me calling me midwit or redditor usually are buffoons that got pissed off bcause I crapped on a cope from dissidoid media spaces like "accelerationism" or whatever I crapped on.

Which are you? I crapped on so many things I lost count. I crapped on critique of modernity, traditionalism, all the right wng, all their ideas, left none untouched. Probably I crapped on some of your darlings as well. Or you wouldnt slander me. In my internet exp is always like this, I get slandered when I touch the pile of stinkin cope of a dissidoid.

You continue to deflect. My remarks are simply based upon my interactions with you in this thread. I was discussing pre-Christian gnostics and you attempted to steer the conversation into one of your bogey men that have nothing to do with it and you lack the self-awareness to realize why that is an issue.

You never apologize, you never accept that you could be at fault, you are paranoid about so called right wingers and dissidents, you are a text book narcissist with zero self-awareness and introspective capability, with a damaged amygdala gland, hippocampus and pre-frontal cortex from porn addiction.

 

[Wolfstorm]

Anahita shares the same root word used for Amahita Muscaria or the Fly Agaric mushroom.

The ancient Persians would drink a psychedelic drink brewed from it to contact her.

These drugs were to these men what Skyrim is to me, or what anime is to the otakus.
You have a visual representation that surpass material reality, where light and shadows creates depth that can't be seem in a physical woman. Both methods are stimulating the imagination, leading to the recognition of the anima as a primordial force within man.

 

[porco-dddio]

You continue to deflect. My remarks are simply based upon my interactions with you in this thread. I was discussing pre-Christian gnostics and you attempted to steer the conversation into one of your bogey men that have nothing to do with it and you lack the self-awareness to realize why that is an issue.

You never apologize, you never accept that you could be at fault, you are paranoid about so called right wingers and dissidents, you are a text book narcissist with zero self-awareness and introspective capability, with a damaged amygdala gland, hippocampus and pre-frontal cortex from porn addiction.

What do you mean I deflect I had to look it on a dictionary to be sure.

You mean redirect attention? I simply said I am seeing people getting radical chrsitian expressing "original christian" beliefs that in my view are activating the psyop of christianity in our age.

As for why or how is happening i got some speculation but I dont think im sharing it, bcause you hate me or something.

 

[Wolfstorm]

I also heard plato was fake, and personally im convinced it can be. I mean, I wouldnt bet on it, but for what I read of plato, it could be plausible he never existed.

Plato was not fake, but there is a theory he was duplicated as Plotinus and Plethon, both also platonists.

 

[porco-dddio]

Plato was not fake, but there is a theory he was duplicated as Plotinus and Plethon, both also platonists.

alright. But maybe socrates inst real.

I also suspect plato, maybe his philosophy is only partly reconstructed.

 

[Wolfstorm]

What do you mean I deflect I had to look it on a dictionary to be sure.

You mean redirect attention? I simply said I am seeing people getting radical chrsitian expressing "original christian" beliefs that in my view are activating the psyop of christianity in our age.

As for why or how is happening i got some speculation but I dont think im sharing it, bcause you hate me or something.

We are not talking about christianity here, but about gallantry and tradcucks.
Tradcucks says that "women were not always like they are today" and idealize a woman of the past that never existed. Women only behave because of moral codes introduced by men. The ideal woman, though, was very real, but only existed in the minds of men. Christianity enters here only as a side subject, because the 12th century was christian. Notice that I mentioned the cathars as minervals, they were syncretic in the way they recognized Christ as just another god in a polytheistic pantheon.

 

[Suigin Trismegistus]

I simply said I am seeing people getting radical chrsitian expressing "original christian" beliefs that in my view are activating the psyop of christianity in our age.

This has nothing to do with the topic of the thread.

 

[porco-dddio]

We are not talking about christianity here, but about gallantry and tradcucks.
Tradcucks says that "women were not always like they are today" and idealize a woman of the past that never existed. Women only behave because of moral codes introduced by men. The ideal woman, though, was very real, but only existed in the minds of men. Christianity enters here only as a side subject, because the 12th century was christian. Notice that I mentioned the cathars as minervals, they were syncretic in the way they recognized Christ as just another god in a polytheistic pantheon.

Yes thanks. I dont interact with every idealization of woman, but I presume is what we men do by default, we project our aspirations on women. Since forever.

Now, to me is more interesting what conflict we do in male society when 2 opposite aspirations create irreconcilable differences. For example some people pretend me get married, due to their desires and their social model and I have another social model in mind and I want women to be high-attention span and masculinized and have a mind I prefer where they get autistic.

The differences are many, some men wan women to be their momma that "fixes life", i hat that as well. I believe it burdens us men horribly.

So yeah we project on the females a ton. And I think is all I have to offer here, bcause I cant get into specifics bout the cults you mentioned cause dont knwo them.

 

[Wolfstorm]

For example some people pretend me get married, due to their desires and their social model and I have another social model in mind and I want women to be high-attention span and masculinized and have a mind I prefer where they get autistic.

Yeah, but we are not talking about you.
We are talking about the ideal woman, which is a reflection of our inner anima, and how this was used first, to tame physical foids, and later, to "liberate" them, turning them back to their primal state, by way of two misunderstandings, the first by way of the clergy, and the second by way of romantic artists.
Yes, woman is a creation of man, it means "will of man". These masculinized foids you prefer, who dont have female attributes such as big breasts and round asses, are the result of the "liberation" of women. This is women in their natural animalistic state. The female attributes, we added them.
Woman in their primal state is like female primates, they dont look different from their male counterparts. Notice the liberation of women comes together with the popularization of pederasty, because children has no sexual attributes.

 

[porco-dddio]

Yeah, but we are not talking about you.
We are talking about the ideal woman, which is a reflection of our inner anima, and how this was used first, to tame physical foids, and later, to "liberate" them, turning them back to their primal state, by way of two misunderstandings, the first by way of the clergy, and the second by way of romantic artists.
Yes, woman is a creation of man, it means "will of man". These masculinized foids you prefer, who dont have female attributes such as big breasts and round asses, are the result of the "liberation" of women. This is women in their natural animalistic state. The female attributes, we added them.
Woman in their primal state is like female primates, they dont look different from their male counterparts. Notice the liberation of women comes together with the popularization of pederasty, because children has no sexual attributes.

You asked if I wanna be tradcuck. Its loaded with internet meanings, I said why not. If I reframe tradition outside of the grip of people who use it to inflict ideological burdens on me, why not. Tradition is pretty much neutral, so once I take it back I can use it however I want.

Its not yes or no question. Tradtion or not tradition. Being something you opt-in or out, you can choose it, its supposed to be chosen, and I think normies are the aberration that pretends as if tradition is some sort of primal truth like giulio ebola.

As for your connections, what Can I say about it, its a topic you evidently are more well versed than I am, cause I dont know if all you say is correct.

Liberation mae women masculine? like, what am I supposed to say? I dont even think women were ever liberated. To engage this topic I would first have to say that women were liberated, but I dont, so what the fuck there is to say? Its all hypothetical, bcause i dont see any woman "liberation" around me.

The other thing about pederasty sounds like complete fantasy instead. Its completely insane.

 

[porco-dddio]

Your logical steps, lets show them.

Step 1 fake assumption: Women "liberation" reduced femmme sexual traits (fake bunk bullshit)
Step 2 children lack developed sex traits
Step 3 mix it up with bollock invented connections and conclude "tehrefore" women liberation is connected to pederasty

Where did you read it? I cannot believe you came up with this stuff on your own, this is seriously fucked up.