Essay How did you debunk Baudrillard?

[Depresso]

@porco-dddio

How and where did you debunk Baudrillard? Start with your understanding of Baudrillard and then proceed with the steps.

I debunked baudrillard already. Mine is a debunk that has not been solved even by a tranny that is a maoist organizer, she got 130 IQ and she had to admit I was right and baudrillard is complete BS.

I also debunked the other 9 interpretations of the redpill-bluepill. In case yuor next thought is gona be "Its all related gnosticism" I debunked that too.

I mean, i already debunked your next 8 or 9 steps before you will take them. But if you want we can proceed with steps, so I show you my debunk of baudrillard, its unchallenged uncontested.

Not even trannies I showed it to were able to contest it, and most of them had sociology title or similar. The tranny that challenged m was a maoist with 2 titles: economy and engineering.

I won. I wonder what you can do against my total devastation of Baudrillard. most incels resort to slander when I break all their copes, dreams and aspirations.

 

[porco-dddio]

related to matrix.

Premise. I dealt with Baudrillard during 2011 bcause it became the establishment in sociology. Most young communists were quoting baudrillard. I have read it on many theses in the literary world.

My interest was not baudrillard specifically. I was into the chick lit genre, and I went around at the time boasting my superiority and the title "top expert in chick lit". I challenged canadian women, and I went around saying if you want to defeat me you have to first have a confrontation. I think I am the top expert in the chick lit genre and I wrote 18 criteria to "judge a book by its cover" using 250 books to produce my analysis. I think I should make it a science because I didnt see others using my book study method.

Problem of my analysis is that I didnt have AI at that time, and so I had to read very fast. Lucky for me I knew mnemonics and I was fresh from university, brainmaxed. So I knew how to read a book cover to cover in a single day. I used that method where you train your eyes to jump faster and skip words. I also skipped entire pages at times.

 

[porco-dddio]

This is my summary. Its what I think matrix movie is all about. And the reason I had to destroy Baudrillard.

Because, baudrillard believes in hyper reality, matrix believes in plato the cave, the 2 are different.

So using baudrillard can only be done if you consider matrix 4.

But if you discuss matrix 1-3 then baudrillard is out of the question. I will tell why

 

[porco-dddio]

Baudrillard says: reality is indistinguishable from representation. Signs wont tell you what is real. Simulated reality can make you experience "real" as a sensory experience.

Completely unrelated to matrix the movie and red bluepill. Totally different.

Matrx movie presents this model instead: There is reality 1 and there is reality 2.

Matrix says there is separation between reality 1 and reality 2. It also offers a choice, pick blue or red. Matrix also expressly says that truth is recovered. You cannot force baudrillard into this narrative.

TLDR = Baudrillard is categorical error.

 

[porco-dddio]

S = signs
R = reality
f = transformation
n = iteration

The structure of plato model is easy. Its f: S -> R

The iteration shows that R can be accessed.

here limit behavior.

Says appearance misleads you but there is reality out there. With more knowledge you correct your perceptions. At the end of your journey there will be truth.

Lets use baudrillard model now.

f: S→S is what he wants us to do . We have to pretend there is no reality or if there is then is not accessible.

So the iteration is a loop.

How you interpret it: show reality is not accessible. "muh meaning" circulates around various systems that represent reality and each of these layer refers to other layers so on...

In matrix instead we have Reality 1 and Reality 2

You can create a map of reality in matrix. You can say first reality leads to the second. Matrix presumes a property of invertibility.

Define map of reality M

M: Reality1 -> Reality2 (first reality points at second reality )

Here you invert reality

You can invert reality, or escape it, pick one of the 2 (cypher did it)

Here made summary with chatGPT.

 

[porco-dddio]

Reality in matrix is inverible. Reality does points to a second reality, but there are essentially only 2 realities. One is false one is true. You can pick truth or fake in matrix. You can go further deep down the rabbithole and reconciliate all contradictions (matrix 3)

Baudrillard would simply lead you to have a sign that points at another sign... that points at another sign. Forever looping. Can you invert reality using baudrillard? No you cant. But you can invert symbols pointing at other symbols... Only if you remain inside the symbol structure.

The answer is a definite NO, you cannot invert the network of baudrillard. Even if you invert symbols you still move from one sign to another forever.

 

[porco-dddio]

Lastly lets consider objective facts.

- Baudrillard is french
- Baudrillard talks about "muh modernity"
- Baudrillard is fashionable
- Baudrillard is quoted in lots of university theses (also in chick lit where I found him)
- Baudrillard was interviewed to talk bout matrix
- Matrix 4 was done much later.
- Quoting baudrillard increases slightly the chances of young men in heat to attract a mate.
- Women who quote baudrillard, increase slightly the chance to arouse sexually university professors, which leads to higher grades

These objective facts will paint the full picture. Now you know why I had to demolish baudrillard in relation to matrix.

 

[porco-dddio]

Forgot to say another important fact.

When you discuss with young transexual individuals in heat, they will tell you often that Plato the cave is "intro level philosophy". Which is true, you get it in your HS book as intro-level material.

Since it feels "intro level" is not taken seriously. Instead, Baudrillard is presented as "advanced" and very important. You have to "get it", and you are very smarty boi if you quote Baudrillard.

Now, this is relevant to explain the categorical error of these young trans individuals in heat. Bcause plato is just basic its just "mid" its not very trendy. Also, arithmetic is so gay, because is entry level, everyone knows arithmetic. Ideas like plato are elementary, they are simple, why should we use them?

When a young person is in heat, male or female or mixed (tranny), the person will often try to use obscure ideas that are difficult so they can posture sophistication.

I also did it. When I was young (around 20) I performed sophistication. Which led me to write a serie of shitposts about incel topics. Explain why the practice of sophistication is yet another delusion. But it works. Or at least it worked for me, it really does not works for all people. If I want I can be sophisticated.

I imagine it like in the movie "he man" where the guy is slurred and told hes not worthy of power, because he does not uses it. Then chad raises and says "i got the power, I just prefer to not use it" and he punches skeletor.

Here inspiring images showing Chad He-Man punching skeletor.