Layout Options

Which layout option do you want to use?

Color Schemes

Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.

Guide How to deal with "validation"

Joined
May 19, 2026
Messages
248
Is very boring to talk to someone who uses terms like "ascension" and "validation" these guys have to be challenged and forced to stop thru persuasive means and forced reading. Like when in blender community someone asks you a basic thing he would have gained access to if he or she watched a tutorial. You simply link a tutorial, you dont deal with it. People have to learn to read the FAQ or watch the video, and if they do not do it then you owe them nothing.

Its like with flat earth, some imbecile always quotes from bible and creates the cope in his mind that a metaphor means literally the earth is flat, and we normal humans had to create wikis and videos like prof dave explains to debunk one by one all these lies. The lies of flat earth are always the same, and theres that guy eric dubay who diluted contents from a book from Samuel Robwotham pretending as if he came up with all these "proofs". His audience is dumb and uneducated so they were unable to derive the info from the source, so they spent 20 times more energy listening to 100+ videos when they could have spent up to 9 hours reading a book... and then debunk it hopefully.

But flat earthers never learn, they got selective reading. So the way you deal with them is you paste a link to a video. If they fail to acknowledge the content, you will in turn not talk to them and you will simply ignore them. Unless they say something original or new, but they never do it. They simply have selective reading and selective quoting habits and forget past arguments we already had. All their lies are already proved wrong, too many times to be counted. They either acknowledge the previous points already had, or they get out.

So the way I treat validation and ascension is the same. Flat earth style. I already proved they are false. Other people proved it too. I dont want to do it again. Fail to acknowledge it, and youre dead to me. My patience has limits. I dont respect anyone using that terminology, its all vagina worship we already said it a million times. If you want to think yourself as a person that needs to be "made valid" by woman approval, go ahead and say it. I do respect simps up to a point and I dont think simps are insecure losers like the guys who enforce "validation" on the forums, I dont have a problem if you see women romantically, i dont have a problem if you have a mythology that brings you to see women as salvation or a conduit to reach higher energies.
But force on me the terminology of "validation" and "ascension" and I will have some serious problems with you. I dont tolerate it.

Im done. Simple as. Flat earthers are currently disrespected and dehumanized, as they deserve. Anyone unable to acknowledge debates already done is not going to be respected. We should remove all redpill and all lookism related jargon. And avoid discussing it forever. It brings us nowhere. Nobody who talked to flat earthers went anywhere, you always go back discussing a point you already made a million times.
 
Activity
So far there's no one here
Top