In Europe and Africa there were more male - male competition and fighting which selected for more dominant males while Asia the males were more docile

[Deleted member 58]

Male male competition in animals leads to more sexually dimorphic males and women are more hypergamous and want stronger genes for their offspring

In Europe and Africa there was much of this.

But in Asia people are less aggressive (lower crime rates, less chimping out), and social harmony is prioritised. So that led to less dominant sexually dimorphic males and thus is why their SMV is lower than that of European and African males.

 

[Tabula Rasa]

Different eco-systems

 

[Asgard]

Europeans aren't that aggressive unlike those who come from MENA (who tend to come from dysfunctional, father absent families) and Sub-Saharan Africa (perhaps genetics play some factor here in the case for black people). Unfortunately, crime rates in Europe are skyrocketing mainly due to... "refugees": most prisons in the continent are overcrowded with non-natives.

 

[Deleted member 58]

Europeans aren't that aggressive unlike those who come from MENA (who tend to come from dysfunctional, father absent families) and Sub-Saharan Africa (perhaps genetics play some factor here in the case for black people). Unfortunately, crime rates in Europe are skyrocketing mainly due to... "refugees": most prisons in the continent are overcrowded with non-natives.

They were historically aggressive in terms of world wars and Spanish inquisition of native americans

 

[Xuelian Baijie]

Male male competition in animals leads to more sexually dimorphic males and women are more hypergamous and want stronger genes for their offspring

In Europe and Africa there was much of this.

But in Asia people are less aggressive (lower crime rates, less chimping out), and social harmony is prioritised. So that led to less dominant sexually dimorphic males and thus is why their SMV is lower than that of European and African males.

In china you couldnt even look at the emperor without being killed. that goes into dominant traits in chinese DNA

India prioritizes status over natural attraction in arranged marriages. that goes into curry dna

 

[Xuelian Baijie]

But in Asia people are less aggressive (lower crime rates, less chimping out), and social harmony is prioritised.

Many places in china theft and burglary are high. Many times higher crime than other places. Chinese like to do violence as a revenge against society too.

The way the native american propagana talks about how we dehumanize everything i feel is valid but no place is it worse than in china

 

[LOOKISM-LOGIC]

Most NEAs seem to lack a soul, but that goes for most people of any race in general.

 

[burn]

Sippy

 

[steve the chad]

Oi, bruv! Now I’m gonna flex on these Asian lads all day — a full-on… rampage!

 

[Trilogy]

Doubt that's true. In every continent human men have done competitive activities like martial arts and dueling

 

[OgreLTN]

Doubt that's true. In every continent human men have done competitive activities like martial arts and dueling

Doesn't mean anything, really. Martial arts isn't what women use to select a male. If you have time and resources to spend on martial arts, it means your environment is more docile and K-selecting. While Africans heavily favor R-selection. You can see this in the difference in life they lead. Asians live long lives with fewer children and nurture each one, Africans have a lot of off spring and just hope one makes it. As well as this, their physiology supports this, Africans develop quicker and comparatively Asians do at a slower pace. There are studied genes that code for more neuroticism and passivity, while others create a lower inhibition in the recipient. You can guess which race has which.

You can explain all this by the difference the two continents have in climate and resource availability. North-east Asia has longer winters with fewer expendable resources, so wasting them on more children could cost the whole lineage it's continuation. So it's more advantageous to have fewer children and make sure they get enough food to grow into adulthood. Africa being the opposite. Although you can make arguments about why Africa would favor K-selection, evolution isn't 100% something that can be explained with certainty, as random genetic drift and multiple strategies are viable to face the same problem.

 

[Budan]

Male male competition in animals leads to more sexually dimorphic males and women are more hypergamous and want stronger genes for their offspring

In Europe and Africa there was much of this.

But in Asia people are less aggressive (lower crime rates, less chimping out), and social harmony is prioritised. So that led to less dominant sexually dimorphic males and thus is why their SMV is lower than that of European and African males.

OP doesn't know anything about the history of Asia, they were even more violent.

 

[newsincerity]

OP doesn't know anything about the history of Asia, they were even more violent.

How can we really know if we weren't there.

 

[MelaninWarlord]

How can we really know if we weren't there.

They definitely weren't, look at your average peaceful vegetarian Hindu or your average low crime studycel East Asian. They didn't have no Roman military conquests or African tribal warfare

 

[pariah]

Another pseud looking at a snapshot of human history and using it to come up with bullshit ad hoc generalizations. Asians were not historically the meek people that they are now, nor were the Swedes or Norwegians or any human population for that matter. It's just that the more civilized a people are, the more "soyified" (so to speak) they become, because civilization is by its nature a repression of primal instincts. If you're observant, then you can see that there's an obvious analogy to be made here with domesticated home pets.