- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 637
- Thread Author
- #1
I had this revelation this morning, and I was thinking of my last shitposts where I was joking and writing about chad worship and why chad is a martyr.
This serie of thought led me to think of all the statues built in the last centuries. And what is chad worship today, and whats the legacy of chadism.
I realized we had set ourselves for failure for 200+ years worshiping losers. Collectively, the entire world has worshiped losers all the time.
It culminated in our days where incel scene started to worship the criminals and the lowIQ "killers" stylized by the media. In america they build statues more often, sign that is a lively culture that narrates itself, and its a positive sign dont get it wrong. They only make statues for losers, like george floyd or pajeets or ordinary people and fat women.
Thing I noticed too, is mythology is not really "a lie", the same way that loser worship is. All losers worshiped by incel scene are complete frauds and lies. But hero chad worship isnt. It can be achilles was never the son of a god, and it can be that minotaurs never existed, but the myth isnt just a blatant lie. The myth tells cultural truths and transforms society with symbols, then invents history, and gives you insights that are very important about the chads.
The incel cult of losers does zero of that. It could seem like there is a parallel between myth and incel loser worship. I dont think there is. I think incels usurped the hero mythology from anarchists of the 900. Behind each of the loser worshiped by them, there is a story that does not checks out. Elliot Rodger was not an incel, rejected incel identity. Alek was not an incel. Cho was not an incel. What cultural truth do these incel loser worship cults tell us? They only give us difficult puzzles to solve, where nothing seems what it is and nothing checks out.
I dont care to disparage someone just because he wasnt an incel, this point im making simply shows the incel tales are not myth. These losers cannot be transformed into symbols that illuminate truth.
For example, if incels say a person represented a particular ideology, but that person own writings dont fit that label, then the legend is being built on a complete lie. The issue is the narrative does not reflects who they were. The only thing a loser cult could be described as is martyr cult where youre supposed to worship the fake struggle and grievance of a loser.
To me seemed the loser cult has the pretense of being mythology, while in reality is a complete lie. If I want to be generous, I can say at best the incel tales are matyr cults, but this is a stretch.
I go furter, I think whole society has worshiped losers. For the last 200 years we worshiped nothing but losers. I think I quit my shitpost here, because I have to crop it on discord. Will expand on other shitposts.
This serie of thought led me to think of all the statues built in the last centuries. And what is chad worship today, and whats the legacy of chadism.
I realized we had set ourselves for failure for 200+ years worshiping losers. Collectively, the entire world has worshiped losers all the time.
It culminated in our days where incel scene started to worship the criminals and the lowIQ "killers" stylized by the media. In america they build statues more often, sign that is a lively culture that narrates itself, and its a positive sign dont get it wrong. They only make statues for losers, like george floyd or pajeets or ordinary people and fat women.
Thing I noticed too, is mythology is not really "a lie", the same way that loser worship is. All losers worshiped by incel scene are complete frauds and lies. But hero chad worship isnt. It can be achilles was never the son of a god, and it can be that minotaurs never existed, but the myth isnt just a blatant lie. The myth tells cultural truths and transforms society with symbols, then invents history, and gives you insights that are very important about the chads.
The incel cult of losers does zero of that. It could seem like there is a parallel between myth and incel loser worship. I dont think there is. I think incels usurped the hero mythology from anarchists of the 900. Behind each of the loser worshiped by them, there is a story that does not checks out. Elliot Rodger was not an incel, rejected incel identity. Alek was not an incel. Cho was not an incel. What cultural truth do these incel loser worship cults tell us? They only give us difficult puzzles to solve, where nothing seems what it is and nothing checks out.
I dont care to disparage someone just because he wasnt an incel, this point im making simply shows the incel tales are not myth. These losers cannot be transformed into symbols that illuminate truth.
For example, if incels say a person represented a particular ideology, but that person own writings dont fit that label, then the legend is being built on a complete lie. The issue is the narrative does not reflects who they were. The only thing a loser cult could be described as is martyr cult where youre supposed to worship the fake struggle and grievance of a loser.
To me seemed the loser cult has the pretense of being mythology, while in reality is a complete lie. If I want to be generous, I can say at best the incel tales are matyr cults, but this is a stretch.
I go furter, I think whole society has worshiped losers. For the last 200 years we worshiped nothing but losers. I think I quit my shitpost here, because I have to crop it on discord. Will expand on other shitposts.
