- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 920
- Thread Author
- #1
Oftentimes normies get triggered by the concept we can measure intelligence.
They start nitpicking and resort to saying IQ is outdated and racist. Or they repeat notions from the past, very often their objections are copied ideas from 50 or 60 years ago. They say for example that IQ test only measures your culture or adaptation to solve puzzles.
Or they go rhetorical gimmicky, and they say "who has a right to say whos intelligent" or one of them said to me "if youre not more intelligent how can you say if someone is intelligent". Silly questions.
In any case. I like to play along. In the normie way, I can ask them what right do they have to dictate what is "success" or what is a measure of "achievement" or who is intelligent?
Bcause, in normie world we see who they elect as "intelligent". They elected huberman, nietzsche, dr.peterson, nick griftentes.
Do I have to accept it? No. I dont want to accept their collective judgements. Where is the evidence nick griftentes is smarty boi? I mean, I think there is some evidence about dr.peterson, but even then, he has traits I find dysgenic, he has a broken mind so even if he has supposedly "high intelligence" he manifested his utter inferiority. And I dont want people like him around.
Who am I to judge or who am I to select? Id like to turn it upside. Who are they to select and who are the normies to pretend their meters are valuable?
Like, another normie criticism is that oftentimes "highIQ" people arent rich or they dont perform according to normie standards. And rich people oftentimes are lowIQ or mid level. Normies say "what grift did you do? loook at me im rich and yuore poor". Or they say "if youre smart why are you poor".
These buffoons dont get it. The wealthy class is reproduced in mass. Its not like the tales of redpill "self improvement" are real or anything. What matters in a society isnt the wealthy class, we can reproduce them in mass anytime. Like, in chyna, they reproduced the wealthy class by simply brainwashing them on american life coaching books and kabbalah life coaching.
Its not hard to have a bunch of meatbags carrying around resources. We may call them "wealthy class". It doesnt means shit if theyre smart or not, we can create them at our leisure. We can also destroy them, and normies will never know what happens. Normies will be found mumbling about "muh golden age" with their magical thinking.
What matters is how many highIQ minds are able to dedicate their time to build foundational knowledge. The wealthy class is far below them. And the system enabled by grifted normies is not selecting for IQ.
Take aside the top grifters I mentioned earlier. You will notice they represent kinda an exception. And the other grifters are far dumber than they are. Like candace owens, kanye west or these tards on jorogan show. These people are deemed "based" which means they are considered smart. But what thefuck did they achieve? I mean, the only eceleb that achieved something in the mix I made was dr.peterson, I believe one time he did a scholarly study and he did a course on symbology.
Cool, but I can hardly consider it "superior achievement" when the efforts of dr.peterson are matched and surpassed by pretty much any standard academia teacher.
My idea is that even if im not "highIQ" myself, it really doesnt matter. I can rely on a measurement system. Just like I use kgs, or fps (feet per second), or anything else really. I dont have toknow the deep scence behind what is mass or gravity, I can just use kgs or grains or whatever measurement. I want more people of IQ, more of them. Bcause I believe we need more of them, less ecelebs elected by the people.
People suck. They select for immorality, and lowIQ. I want there to be hierarchy and high achievement, not trash and protein shakes.
They start nitpicking and resort to saying IQ is outdated and racist. Or they repeat notions from the past, very often their objections are copied ideas from 50 or 60 years ago. They say for example that IQ test only measures your culture or adaptation to solve puzzles.
Or they go rhetorical gimmicky, and they say "who has a right to say whos intelligent" or one of them said to me "if youre not more intelligent how can you say if someone is intelligent". Silly questions.
In any case. I like to play along. In the normie way, I can ask them what right do they have to dictate what is "success" or what is a measure of "achievement" or who is intelligent?
Bcause, in normie world we see who they elect as "intelligent". They elected huberman, nietzsche, dr.peterson, nick griftentes.
Do I have to accept it? No. I dont want to accept their collective judgements. Where is the evidence nick griftentes is smarty boi? I mean, I think there is some evidence about dr.peterson, but even then, he has traits I find dysgenic, he has a broken mind so even if he has supposedly "high intelligence" he manifested his utter inferiority. And I dont want people like him around.
Who am I to judge or who am I to select? Id like to turn it upside. Who are they to select and who are the normies to pretend their meters are valuable?
Like, another normie criticism is that oftentimes "highIQ" people arent rich or they dont perform according to normie standards. And rich people oftentimes are lowIQ or mid level. Normies say "what grift did you do? loook at me im rich and yuore poor". Or they say "if youre smart why are you poor".
These buffoons dont get it. The wealthy class is reproduced in mass. Its not like the tales of redpill "self improvement" are real or anything. What matters in a society isnt the wealthy class, we can reproduce them in mass anytime. Like, in chyna, they reproduced the wealthy class by simply brainwashing them on american life coaching books and kabbalah life coaching.
Its not hard to have a bunch of meatbags carrying around resources. We may call them "wealthy class". It doesnt means shit if theyre smart or not, we can create them at our leisure. We can also destroy them, and normies will never know what happens. Normies will be found mumbling about "muh golden age" with their magical thinking.
What matters is how many highIQ minds are able to dedicate their time to build foundational knowledge. The wealthy class is far below them. And the system enabled by grifted normies is not selecting for IQ.
Take aside the top grifters I mentioned earlier. You will notice they represent kinda an exception. And the other grifters are far dumber than they are. Like candace owens, kanye west or these tards on jorogan show. These people are deemed "based" which means they are considered smart. But what thefuck did they achieve? I mean, the only eceleb that achieved something in the mix I made was dr.peterson, I believe one time he did a scholarly study and he did a course on symbology.
Cool, but I can hardly consider it "superior achievement" when the efforts of dr.peterson are matched and surpassed by pretty much any standard academia teacher.
My idea is that even if im not "highIQ" myself, it really doesnt matter. I can rely on a measurement system. Just like I use kgs, or fps (feet per second), or anything else really. I dont have toknow the deep scence behind what is mass or gravity, I can just use kgs or grains or whatever measurement. I want more people of IQ, more of them. Bcause I believe we need more of them, less ecelebs elected by the people.
People suck. They select for immorality, and lowIQ. I want there to be hierarchy and high achievement, not trash and protein shakes.
