- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 709
- Thread Author
- #1
I disagree with right wingers, they say feminist theory got more radical the more time went on, I think it got less radical.
Like, for example one of the first feminist writer Mary Wollstonecraft represented a couple of unmarried people who also got kids.
In today world instead feminists get married more often than the normies at the bottom.
Sure, you will make me notice marriage is also interpreted as a luxury in our society, a strong status symbol for people who can afford it, for people who are of certain established social standing, and there are impediments that prohibit the lower classes to attain a married life. That would be well received and I would agree with you I have to urge the reader to consider my point broadly.
I noticed the todays feminists rarely advocate for abolition of marriage and this is instead a male stance now. Its us males who want to abolish it, and we created collectives around this idea of rejecting marriage. I also joined one when I was 15, and later joined also MGTOW and I was interested in their anti-marriage takes, which led me to different conclusions than their right wing platitudes.
Some socialists and anarchists said marriage is bad because capitalism whatever. I have read this perspective on one of the books from houellebecq, and hes a doctrinal member of the nouvelle droite in france, one of these fags who do the intellectual as social type aesthetic and criticizes modernity.
In the past opposing marriage I presume was a way of being leftist. I dont really know because its in the 60s where it was formulated the ideology of love marriage and students were trained on it, and erich fromm books were distributed. Because ideology has to be taught, we often forget it and we think is just floating in the air.
Anyways, If I consider past feminist takes, i find them still relevant, obviously you gotta be wary of their socialist bias. And whatever, you have to take what you can take, maybe you can learn a thing or 2.
I have engaged more the right leaning perspectives I admit. Its due to my anti-right wing bias. Maybe I should learn the SJW ways now, so I learn both of them.
Like, for example one of the first feminist writer Mary Wollstonecraft represented a couple of unmarried people who also got kids.
In today world instead feminists get married more often than the normies at the bottom.
Sure, you will make me notice marriage is also interpreted as a luxury in our society, a strong status symbol for people who can afford it, for people who are of certain established social standing, and there are impediments that prohibit the lower classes to attain a married life. That would be well received and I would agree with you I have to urge the reader to consider my point broadly.
I noticed the todays feminists rarely advocate for abolition of marriage and this is instead a male stance now. Its us males who want to abolish it, and we created collectives around this idea of rejecting marriage. I also joined one when I was 15, and later joined also MGTOW and I was interested in their anti-marriage takes, which led me to different conclusions than their right wing platitudes.
Some socialists and anarchists said marriage is bad because capitalism whatever. I have read this perspective on one of the books from houellebecq, and hes a doctrinal member of the nouvelle droite in france, one of these fags who do the intellectual as social type aesthetic and criticizes modernity.
In the past opposing marriage I presume was a way of being leftist. I dont really know because its in the 60s where it was formulated the ideology of love marriage and students were trained on it, and erich fromm books were distributed. Because ideology has to be taught, we often forget it and we think is just floating in the air.
Anyways, If I consider past feminist takes, i find them still relevant, obviously you gotta be wary of their socialist bias. And whatever, you have to take what you can take, maybe you can learn a thing or 2.
I have engaged more the right leaning perspectives I admit. Its due to my anti-right wing bias. Maybe I should learn the SJW ways now, so I learn both of them.
