Layout Options

Which layout option do you want to use?

Color Schemes

Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.

Right wing social critique is shit

Joined
May 19, 2026
Messages
1,757
These fucks only glorify teamwork and shit tier social critique. They think they have a right to cast judgement on anything because they consumed it one time.

Like with gaming, they only play egalitarian rot, stuff where everyone wins some "participation trophy".

Examples are call of duty, Arma, battlefield, counter strike.

Or whatever they pass these days as "tactical" shooter.

It enrages me that lowly plebeians have forced me to consider the color of some woman hair, or lowered my haughty critique by forcing me to pay attention to NARRATIVE... As if it matters for something in a video game.

True games are all about ultra violence, speed, reflexes and air movement. Not narrative and karenry and gossip. That's communism.

Leninism appeals to 2 types of people:
- the psychopathic elite
- the lowIQ egalitarian

No in between. This is why it's a model resurrected for the current internet age, full of defecated right wing scum who worships grifters and ecelebs.

The low IQ right winger doesn't even knows probably, that what he's doing is communism.
 
Benjammins cope
 
No idea why MAGA keeps doing this anti immigrant propaganda. Probably is to capture people who dont like immigration. But nobody likes immigration.

Anyway dont fall for it. MAGA or voting in general will never stop immigration.
 
No idea why MAGA keeps doing this anti immigrant propaganda. Probably is to capture people who dont like immigration. But nobody likes immigration.

Anyway dont fall for it. MAGA or voting in general will never stop immigration.
it literally does

Yes. Under Trump, both legal and illegal immigration have dropped sharply.


Southern border crossings fell to historic lows in 2025 after his crackdown (expanded expedited removal, asylum restrictions, remain-in-Mexico revival, troop deployments). Legal immigration also slowed — refugee admissions were cut, visa processing tightened, and Pew found the US immigrant population declined for the first time in nearly 60 years. Census data show US population growth slowed sharply in 2025 largely because of this drop in net immigration. Cato Institute notes the cuts to legal immigration have actually been proportionally larger than the cuts to illegal immigration.


Sources:


 
The right at the moment have a few groups fighting like the left have been doing and are doing now. You have the RINOs, the neo-cons, MAGA, and those pushed in due to the left's purging anyone that wasn't lockstep with them at that moment. At the moment MAGA has taken over and you're seeing the neo-cons being slowly purged, however the RINOS, and other bad actors are trying to keep as many of the neo-cons around as possible to make it easier to back stab who in charge later. (I mean, look on what happen to Trump his first term.) The left is currently having this problem, look at the commies in their group trying to take over the party. The left is currently at a breaking point and I think we will see them shatter soon. Hell think 2028 might be the time unless they find someone both the commies and classic libs both accept to run. Which I don't think they have anyone, I mean anyone the commies threw in will lose, and doubt the commies will vote for a classical liberal unless they're a big name, and most big names won't get many votes outside of blue states which kills their chances.
 
Yes. Under Trump, both legal and illegal immigration have dropped sharply.
Is it superior than obama? I mean correct if im wrong, the deporter in chief obama did 3-4mil deportations.

Instead ICE for now is stuck at 1.5 million.

Obama social perception: Nothing to see here, its all good. Only south park did some commentary (mexican joker)
Trump social perception: hes called fascist nazi whatever. Everyone is angry. Mexican voters feel betrayed. People attack the ICE for their arbitrary violence

Its not lookin good. And all around theres people who swear to never let this happen again. Trump is far more socially abrasive, and in the future it will be close to impossible to advocate anything he was slandered for (anti immigration anti SJW)

Is trump really fixing SJW problem? On surface level it appears so. I mean he did ban SOME courses. But he left intact the entire marxist machine, almost all of it. He simply pleased his audience removing 1 or 2 unnecessary university courses. Muh trannies basically. The rest is still there. Plus he also removed useful things the government was doing, including protection vs scams and weather related and rules related to pharma. And he also pulled crypto scams on his followers.

My thesis basically is hes a bolshevik fraud, a communist. Hes leading people with surface "anti communism", but hes very close to a modern day Roosevelt conning people the same way, and instead helpin the commies.

As for his fraud, everyone can see it relies on a word gimmick. You just call it "legal" and welcome waves of immigrant indians but its just a gimmick word, like calling "patriot city" instead of "smart city", but in essence nothing changed.
 
Obama did ~3M formal removals over 8 years (peak ~400k+/year). Accurate. Trump's second term (as of mid-2026) has ICE at 350k+ removals already in FY2026, interior arrests quadrupled, detention up sharply, and claims of 1M+ total exits including self-deportations. Not "stuck at 1.5M." Pace is competitive or higher in key metrics; full-term comparison is incomplete.
Abcnews
Media double standard is real. Obama's numbers got little left-media heat; Trump's get maximal outrage. That is perception bias, not proof of inferior policy.
Legal vs. illegal is not a "word gimmick." Sovereignty requires the distinction. High-skill legal entries (Indians dominate H-1B ~70%) differ in skills, selection, and net fiscal impact from mass illegal low-skill flows. Trump has tightened both, not opened the floodgates.
DEI/SJW: Trump issued executive orders ending federal DEI funding, grants, and race preferences in education/hiring. Courts have blocked some; the machine is not fully dismantled. Not "1-2 courses." Residual bureaucracy exists under every president.
Bolshevik/communist claim is absurd. Tax cuts, deregulation, energy expansion, and anti-DEI moves are the opposite of central planning or class warfare. FDR parallel is rhetorical, not substantive. Crypto memes and regulatory rollbacks do not equal Soviet economics.
Core flaw: equating media volume + incomplete early numbers with policy failure, then labeling market-oriented enforcement "communist." Enforcement numbers rose under Trump; institutional inertia and courts limit speed. That is reality, not fraud.
 
I don't understand why right wingers hate diversity/egalitarianism, especially in media. Don't they understand that everybody wants to have fun? Why should every video-game have to appeal to the same (white and male) demographic? Disabled, BIPOC and all ages deserve to have media catered to them, and better an integrated world than a fractured one. Everybody enjoys video-games now, even geriatrics, women and minorities; deal with it! You should be happy that other people are so eager to participate in your culture and share your values. Women contributing to the economy and egalitarianism benefits everybody in the long run. Traditionalists & incels are too eager to be dogs for women, even when women want to be independent.

Like with gaming, they only play egalitarian rot, stuff where everyone wins some "participation trophy".
Life isn't a zero-sum game, it's a positive-sum game where we all contribute to each other's success. Everyone has something to contribute, even if it's consumption revenue, dedication or motivation for the other players. Almost everything we take for granted is a result of large teams of people setting aside their differences to work together, and only by combining many perspectives and resource pools can we generate systems of greater complexity.

This is why it's a model resurrected for the current internet age, full of defecated right wing scum who worships grifters and ecelebs.
Many people don't have the time, resources or intelligence to comprehend the world and just want to feel heard. E-celebrities allow those who are unable to follow the convoluted corpus of political literature to attain a shorthand of the current zeitgeist and pick a stance. Then, having picked a stance, they can debate, and this debate sparks civil progress, and the public nature of this progress allows for the average person to feel included in the political decisions of their own countries, granting them a locus of control over their circumstances, which improves individual welfare.

No idea why MAGA keeps doing this anti immigrant propaganda. Probably is to capture people who dont like immigration. But nobody likes immigration.

Anyway dont fall for it. MAGA or voting in general will never stop immigration.
Immigration is necessary for the economy, providing cheaper labour that produces a lower cost of goods. The same people that complain about immigration complain about the cost of consumer goods rising when immigration falls. Chinese and Indian immigrants especially tend to be civil and pleasant, and contribute technical expertise in areas where there are shortfalls (e.g. Medicine). Seeing racism online is honestly so heartbreaking ya know, the vast majority just want peaceful integration. Even when immigrants are on welfare it indirectly contributes to GDP through consumer spending, so the host country does benefit even from unproductive immigrants, as industries that would otherwise go bankrupt from lack of customers can be kept afloat through an increased consumer base.

Particularly relevant is that all of this Natsoc/Racism/Blackpill nonsense blows up just as AI makes designer babies commercially viable. Like magic, you suddenly have a base of anti-incel career women and foreign investors with a lot of cash and malice. I remember when there were genuine debates about the ethics of designer genomes, but it seems that any ethical hedges are going to evaporate into the wind with an emerging international consumer base. Yes, but please keep arguing about Sydney Sweeney and 'Incel Aryan Brotherhoods' while Ultra-Feminist Ubermensch and Bharatian Yottachads gestate in the background. I am sure these *checks notes* androcidal-fantasing feminists and racism-incensed pariahs will not hold a grudge whatsoever...

I don't get it. Why do people hate communism? In the end, the only real philosophical debate that matters is whether inherited resources should be gatekept or distributed, applied to various degrees of macrostructure. The former results in Fascism, and the latter results in Communism. In an era of resource-abundance, such as one that may be ushered with AI, I would rather live in a generous and equal world than one of tyrannical hierarchy. Fabian-left politics is epically based and High IQ. Everybody deserves to live a life of dignity.
 
I don't understand why right wingers hate diversity/egalitarianism, especially in media. Don't they understand that everybody wants to have fun? Why should every video-game have to appeal to the same (white and male) demographic? Disabled, BIPOC and all ages deserve to have media catered to them, and better an integrated world than a fractured one. Everybody enjoys video-games now, even geriatrics, women and minorities; deal with it! You should be happy that other people are so eager to participate in your culture and share your values. Women contributing to the economy and egalitarianism benefits everybody in the long run. Traditionalists & incels are too eager to be dogs for women, even when women want to be independent.


Life isn't a zero-sum game, it's a positive-sum game where we all contribute to each other's success. Everyone has something to contribute, even if it's consumption revenue, dedication or motivation for the other players. Almost everything we take for granted is a result of large teams of people setting aside their differences to work together, and only by combining many perspectives and resource pools can we generate systems of greater complexity.


Many people don't have the time, resources or intelligence to comprehend the world and just want to feel heard. E-celebrities allow those who are unable to follow the convoluted corpus of political literature to attain a shorthand of the current zeitgeist and pick a stance. Then, having picked a stance, they can debate, and this debate sparks civil progress, and the public nature of this progress allows for the average person to feel included in the political decisions of their own countries, granting them a locus of control over their circumstances, which improves individual welfare.


Immigration is necessary for the economy, providing cheaper labour that produces a lower cost of goods. The same people that complain about immigration complain about the cost of consumer goods rising when immigration falls. Chinese and Indian immigrants especially tend to be civil and pleasant, and contribute technical expertise in areas where there are shortfalls (e.g. Medicine). Seeing racism online is honestly so heartbreaking ya know, the vast majority just want peaceful integration. Even when immigrants are on welfare it indirectly contributes to GDP through consumer spending, so the host country does benefit even from unproductive immigrants, as industries that would otherwise go bankrupt from lack of customers can be kept afloat through an increased consumer base.

Particularly relevant is that all of this Natsoc/Racism/Blackpill nonsense blows up just as AI makes designer babies commercially viable. Like magic, you suddenly have a base of anti-incel career women and foreign investors with a lot of cash and malice. I remember when there were genuine debates about the ethics of designer genomes, but it seems that any ethical hedges are going to evaporate into the wind with an emerging international consumer base. Yes, but please keep arguing about Sydney Sweeney and 'Incel Aryan Brotherhoods' while Ultra-Feminist Ubermensch and Bharatian Yottachads gestate in the background. I am sure these *checks notes* androcidal-fantasing feminists and racism-incensed pariahs will not hold a grudge whatsoever...

I don't get it. Why do people hate communism? In the end, the only real philosophical debate that matters is whether inherited resources should be gatekept or distributed, applied to various degrees of macrostructure. The former results in Fascism, and the latter results in Communism. In an era of resource-abundance, such as one that may be ushered with AI, I would rather live in a generous and equal world than one of tyrannical hierarchy. Fabian-left politics is epically based and High IQ. Everybody deserves to live a life of dignity.
Growing pains of modernity. Also increasing global uncertainty and strife which is why this kind of discourse has become more prevalent. Fukuyama wrote a book recently discussing the emerging challenges facing the liberal order.
 
Almost everything we take for granted is a result of large teams of people setting aside their differences to work together, and only by combining many perspectives and resource pools can we generate systems of greater complexity.
i felt like they erased my perspective. I mean I dare say "our perspective" because we were a movement in 2011 who had something to say about gaming.

But more broadly, the attitude towards gaming is not good, they dont believe in gaming. They have this idea is shameful to play games past a certain age. But I seen them instead talk about movies feeling as if its "intellectual". I dont feel the same way. I dont feel enlightened and intellectual discuss a movie. What excites me more is gaming, I also find it "true" bcause it plays scripts of my civilization.

That said, their "anti SJW" group is very abrasive, and conducts a leninist united front tactic where everyone has to think the same, and the things they ask us to pay attention to, are sme of the least relevant aspects of gaming. Such as: the color of hair on the textures of some female characters, the palette in the skin tones, the narrative, the boring aspects of single player campaigns.

Nothing to say about gameplay, nobody takes gaming seriously, they just use it as a cynical stair to climb politics, to spread cheap ass demoralization and anxiety and ragebait on the internet. And as demonstrated, their movement has no outcome, they produced nothing of artistic value. Because they are empty, dont deny it, they are completely empty.

E-celebrities allow those who are unable to follow the convoluted corpus of political literature
We already had this argument in the age of intellectuals. It was proved wrong. If you want I can recap.
I don't get it. Why do people hate communism? In the end, the only real philosophical debate that matters is whether inherited resources should be gatekept or distributed, applied to various degrees of macrostructure. The former results in Fascism, and the latter results in Communism. In an era of resource-abundance, such as one that may be ushered with AI, I would rather live in a generous and equal world than one of tyrannical hierarchy. Fabian-left politics is epically based and High IQ. Everybody deserves to live a life of dignity.
Why people hate communism? I think it boils down to propaganda, you cant have people hate in mass a specific thing without making it appear as the devil.

I can tell you why I hate it. Its more true to say I disagree with communism. Instead I do hate communists, the ones I speak to, the dudes in the streets. But, no I dont really "hate" their ideas. Your comment provides me an example of a thing I hate about communism.

I hate people present it as the only model of redistribution. It was associated the idea communism = redistribution. And people are really really obtuse, like a donkey, they really have this idea associated. They think communism = redistribution, probably is the only idea they know about communism.

Truth be told it isnt the ideology that invented the concept "redistribution". I am convinced if we simply break this spell and convince people to un-learn communist jargon, is all for the better.
 
I don't understand why right wingers hate diversity/egalitarianism, especially in media. Don't they understand that everybody wants to have fun? Why should every video-game have to appeal to the same (white and male) demographic? Disabled, BIPOC and all ages deserve to have media catered to them, and better an integrated world than a fractured one. Everybody enjoys video-games now, even geriatrics, women and minorities; deal with it! You should be happy that other people are so eager to participate in your culture and share your values. Women contributing to the economy and egalitarianism benefits everybody in the long run. Traditionalists & incels are too eager to be dogs for women, even when women want to be independent.
Simple, cause the left weaponized it. It basically means now anti-straight white men. Look at anything that pushes "diversity" and shit. What is the white guy, often gay, some beta or made to be the villain. Often enough these fags making these games, shows, movies, etc. Do the same three things that even the fucking normies and NPCs are waking the fuck up to it. From taking an established IP like Star Wars, Star Trek, Marvel, DC, D&D, LOTR, etc and fucking change everything about it doing the classic hate on the original white male protag making a bitter old man, a failure, and/or made to become the villain for the new woke mary sue self insert or black replacement to take over and have everyone say they're better than the old hero or even get the old hero to say it. Then they just get on a soapbox and push woke shit till people drop the series. Plus they change the lore to make everything look like it cali doing cosplay.

People act like we haven't have "non-white male shows" shows, movies, comics, games, etc. We had many of them and people love it and didn't care the main character was black, a girl, etc. The problem is every old ip was remade and they removed the white guy and made him black, gay, or a girl. Or made a new character to replace them as they made the old one a joke then had the classic fans be told they're racist, sexist, etc if they don't like the bad reboot. Do you think people won't catch on when they keep doing it again and again and again.
Immigration is necessary for the economy, providing cheaper labour that produces a lower cost of goods. The same people that complain about immigration complain about the cost of consumer goods rising when immigration falls. Chinese and Indian immigrants especially tend to be civil and pleasant, and contribute technical expertise in areas where there are shortfalls (e.g. Medicine). Seeing racism online is honestly so heartbreaking ya know, the vast majority just want peaceful integration. Even when immigrants are on welfare it indirectly contributes to GDP through consumer spending, so the host country does benefit even from unproductive immigrants, as industries that would otherwise go bankrupt from lack of customers can be kept afloat through an increased consumer base.

Particularly relevant is that all of this Natsoc/Racism/Blackpill nonsense blows up just as AI makes designer babies commercially viable. Like magic, you suddenly have a base of anti-incel career women and foreign investors with a lot of cash and malice. I remember when there were genuine debates about the ethics of designer genomes, but it seems that any ethical hedges are going to evaporate into the wind with an emerging international consumer base. Yes, but please keep arguing about Sydney Sweeney and 'Incel Aryan Brotherhoods' while Ultra-Feminist Ubermensch and Bharatian Yottachads gestate in the background. I am sure these *checks notes* androcidal-fantasing feminists and racism-incensed pariahs will not hold a grudge whatsoever...

I don't get it. Why do people hate communism? In the end, the only real philosophical debate that matters is whether inherited resources should be gatekept or distributed, applied to various degrees of macrostructure. The former results in Fascism, and the latter results in Communism. In an era of resource-abundance, such as one that may be ushered with AI, I would rather live in a generous and equal world than one of tyrannical hierarchy. Fabian-left politics is epically based and High IQ. Everybody deserves to live a life of dignity.
Immigration is hurting more than helping and people won't admit we need to cut back and stop it and change how everything is done cause it's NOT working. Especially since most nations don't allow this. You can't just enter another country cause you really want to live the "good life" there. Also, the illegals only lower some labor. Often enough, the companies that hire them still make you pay the same amount and pocket the extra money. Plus, even though they shouldn't be getting said funds to begin with. Illegals take from welfare, and rarely put anything in. Often working under the table, or using false IDs. However since most NPCs can't really think and don't care what happens if they feel good about it. They don't noticed if you bring a million people to do the "cheap" jobs. The demand for those jobs stay low mean less pay, rent goes up as more people need a place to live, etc. So you get to a point where the people who are from the nation are paying for those who don't do shit and live off the tax papers dime and might have one or two people who just there to make money and head back to their home to live the good life there. I am all for legal immigration but it been abused so much it's we need to clean out the bad actors before anyone get to come.

As for why do people hate communism. Simple, it's always fags wanting to spend other people's money. Look at every fucking nation that went marxist. They stole from the "rich" and put it into programs till they had the power to just say we can be facist now and even then they went to shit. Communism always ends up as facism, not people wanting to keep their money they earn themselves.
 
I think videogames are real. But as for the "appeal to minority" I think is just performance, its bcause all around us there are government efforts to hire useless youth that cannot create games on their own. An incel from our forums was hired to do it, i refer to dirtycurrycel, he had to work for a company that enforces pronouns.

Basically they pay you for "not working" and youre not a real game developer, youre there to be lectured by art directors and so on.

Obviously the so called "inclusivity" resulting from it is performative, and it resorts to changing skin colors in the textures or showing stereotypes of the age of progress, black women, lesbian characters, ugly women who are evil and obnoxious.

Point being, there is not a response to liberal artstyle. There isnt anything really. The anti-SJW movement is probably worse, and they are the people who caused communism in gaming. And if you want to solve it, there are real solutions but the anti-SJW movement will be a barrier they will not want to decommunistify gaming.
 
I don't understand why right wingers hate diversity/egalitarianism, especially in media.
I dont know how you cant. Its not about subhumans not allowed to have their own things or having their seat at the table.

its when its obnoxious. When Disney is running wratchet nigger mermaid. Its lesbian ghostbusters. its rewriting history and culture in videogames just to attack its audience.

You can have a gender neutral racial neutral protagonist but its not its not going to force us to buy the game.

Nobody is complaining about diversity in the Walking Dead because they did it right.
you might think it does not count because Rick Grimes is kinda the main character but thats not true for the telltale series
 
Activity
So far there's no one here
Top