Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ishmael" data-source="post: 86351" data-attributes="member: 532">I think one big issue many people have is assuming that God is an entity, or a &#039;person&#039;. God is the energy source. The permanent origin of it. He makes up everything in physical reality because it&#039;s His bubble that He interacts with from the outside. He influences physical reality through manipulating the medium itself. This is part of why Jews have such a hard time with the &#039;Son&#039; terminology when talking about Jesus. This is encoded in the name/concept Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh. It means &quot;I AM THAT I AM.&quot; It&#039;s in direct response to a question of identity, and rather than provide a name, God replies in a concept. I am that I am.&nbsp; He just is. There isn&#039;t another descriptor. He is not an entity, &#039;He&#039; really isn&#039;t even a &#039;He&#039; in the traditional senses that we would think. The masculine part of God is the hardcoded parts of the universe. Logics, Laws of Physics and Nature, Math, etc. And often that is the part that we interact with most of the time. We get nudges, logical conclusions. If you pay attention God will let you know He&#039;s paying attention to you through subtle and specific signs. I can articulate what I have seen usually, which I suppose often avoids the schizophrenia/religious psychosis angle but I can understand not everyone might be able to.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ishmael, post: 86351, member: 532"] I think one big issue many people have is assuming that God is an entity, or a 'person'. God [I]is[/I] the energy source. The permanent origin of it. He makes up everything in physical reality because it's His bubble that He interacts with from the outside. He influences physical reality through manipulating the medium itself. This is part of why Jews have such a hard time with the 'Son' terminology when talking about Jesus. This is encoded in the name/concept [B]Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh.[/B] It means "I AM THAT I AM." It's in direct response to a question of identity, and rather than provide a name, God replies in a concept. I am that I am. He just is. There isn't another descriptor. He is not an entity, 'He' really isn't even a 'He' in the traditional senses that we would think. The masculine part of God is the hardcoded parts of the universe. Logics, Laws of Physics and Nature, Math, etc. And often that is the part that we interact with most of the time. We get nudges, logical conclusions. If you pay attention God will let you know He's paying attention to you through subtle and specific signs. I can articulate what I have seen usually, which I suppose often avoids the schizophrenia/religious psychosis angle but I can understand not everyone might be able to. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread