- Joined
- Feb 6, 2024
- Messages
- 1,808
- Thread Author
- #1
I'm a schizoid misanthrope who has more or less checked out of the game, but those who are still playing might find what I say or the whole concept of the Whitepill insensitive or insulting. I've talked in previous threads about the nature of female desire and how it's ultimately rooted in reproductive urges or psychologically conditioned by new media.
But if incels are so repulsive to women, they'd either be treated as a doormat or an ATM if they managed to 'ascend'' (Heck, if this is already an occurrence which average men experience it's almost guaranteed to happen if someone is sub-5).
Some incels are expecting to ascend and end up in some sort of Disney unicorn relationship where a femoid is going to end up 'loving them for who they really are' when it's pretty clear that it doesn't exist in real life.
It's why I advocate men living for themselves and not for the sake of women. But if they want to continue to cry about how 'women won't love them because they aren't Chad' or whatever who am I to stop them from continuing to do so?
But if incels are so repulsive to women, they'd either be treated as a doormat or an ATM if they managed to 'ascend'' (Heck, if this is already an occurrence which average men experience it's almost guaranteed to happen if someone is sub-5).
Some incels are expecting to ascend and end up in some sort of Disney unicorn relationship where a femoid is going to end up 'loving them for who they really are' when it's pretty clear that it doesn't exist in real life.
It's why I advocate men living for themselves and not for the sake of women. But if they want to continue to cry about how 'women won't love them because they aren't Chad' or whatever who am I to stop them from continuing to do so?