Discussion What do you consider a normie?

[Quintilian]

I consider it, a person with a common world view that is similar or alike in other world views, attitudes and or beliefs or experiences.

What are your guy's thoughts or opinions on the matter, can you provide any experiences or moments in your life that prove this point?

 

[porco-dddio]

Theres lots of philosophy of the normie, but I think mine is the best on the entire internet.

I think normies are "gregarious humans" or "default humans". Rely on "norms" to establish a perceived sense of herd mentality, and get grifted by ruthless tyrannical "leaders".

 

[sadcel]

It's a subjective term to me tbh the meaning changes with the context.

 

[porco-dddio]

I have too many essays on normies, here one i wrote today

I cllect them all derive some philosophy some day

 

[MAGONIA]

Normie is NT, Racepill type: Blue Pill, Never been incel over 1 month (includes whore maxing) after turning 19 and before turning 30, Never read more than one core religious book, Does not know what the petrodollar is

 

[lonelywanderer]

Extroverted, has friends and is in and out of relationships, has generic takes and humour and gets easily offended is my summary

 

[ZZEBRA813]

Extroverted, has friends and is in and out of relationships, has generic takes and humour and gets easily offended is my summary and has some what strong political views

 

[Wolfstorm]

A meatbot who follows the herd and believe that "humans are social creatures".
He is incapable of inner dialogue, and can't imagine a apple.
He only parrots what he sees on social media.

Meatbots are usually divided into two political camps.
They need the division, because they itch for conflict everyday.
If there is no politics, then they resort to gossip, then to slander, then to violence.
If there is no religion, they behave like animals, with no respect and no morals.

The meatbot is a creature, he was created by whoever holds his reins.
His opinions? They come from political grifters.
His tastes? They come from media constant repetition.
His education? Just brainwashing from school.

He spends large sums of money on subscriptions and corporate slop.
But from amateurs, he wants content for free, believing he is a slave owner.
He always try to crush those who are more vulnerable, because he is a coward who can only act in groups.

 

[Depresso]

Those not in the subculture

 

[porco-dddio]

Here my crash course in normies and I wrote 4 rules of a normie.

 

[porco-dddio]

this is what normies call "the reality of life"

 

[Shinrinken]

Normie is a term that doesn't have a real definition. It's a slang term that basically the same as tourist/outsider/etc. The best way to define it is someone that might be into something passively often due to it being a fad or their friends are into but not really them. Their often the majority of a group unless it small and unknown. Like back in the 70-80s most people playing D&D weren't normies as it wasn't cool to play them. Now most people might have a 5e book cause it was big due to the lockdown and Crit. Role. However don't known much about it without the book in front of them or most likely now a app. Same with stuff like comics and other fandoms. You have these "lifelong fans" that only know what the Wiki says on said character and groups. Though ask them to pull out their longbox and they start making excuses and act like not having the comics, or watching the old shows doesn't mean anything. They're the same as someone who did watch the old shows, read the old comics, play the old games, etc.

 

[porco-dddio]

Normie is a term that doesn't have a real definition.

just gave you a definition and 4 rules of normies.

"SJW has no definition". Cope, it has it. We also have SJW theory at every level in society: academic, public discourse, memetic, political, journalism.

Same for normie, we have the philosophy, the psychology, the religion.

We have it all already.

We can say who is a normie, who isnt. Its pretty fucking easy.

 

[Shinrinken]

just gave you a definition and 4 rules of normies.

"SJW has no definition". Cope, it has it. We also have SJW theory at every level in society: academic, public discourse, memetic, political, journalism.

Same for normie, we have the philosophy, the psychology, the religion.

We have it all already.

We can say who is a normie, who isnt. Its pretty fucking easy.

How many people agree with those definitions. It's a slang term that has loose meaning, often to "other" people in a group. Which what I said, most people agree in a general idea but don't really agree where the line should be drawn on what's a normie.

 

[porco-dddio]

How many people agree with those definitions. It's a slang term that has loose meaning, often to "other" people in a group. Which what I said, most people agree in a general idea but don't really agree where the line should be drawn on what's a normie.

In terms of agreement we can use 4chan and youtubers.

There are youtubers who defined a normie, and they have agreeableness and they are validated by others who call them "great thinker".

I dont have that level of agreement on my side, but I can easily reference one of these "intellectuals" on youtube to satisfy your request of agreement.

There are definitions at any level, I already said it.

You ignoring definitions is not a valid argument.

 

[Depresso]

this is what normies call "the reality of life"

Without schizos and autists you get a humoid loosh farm and that's wrong.

 

[porco-dddio]

Without schizos and autists you get a humoid loosh farm and that's wrong.

also, this was part of 3 shitpost series. I also prove that its us schizos the ones who should be worried.

Not that im favoring normies, im just being realistic.

 

[Shinrinken]

In terms of agreement we can use 4chan and youtubers.

There are youtubers who defined a normie, and they have agreeableness and they are validated by others who call them "great thinker".

I dont have that level of agreement on my side, but I can easily reference one of these "intellectuals" on youtube to satisfy your request of agreement.

There are definitions at any level, I already said it.

You ignoring definitions is not a valid argument.

Thanks for proving my fucking point.

 

[porco-dddio]

Thanks for proving my fucking point.

Well I listened to them they do converge on some common themes. Even if most of the youtubers try to make it seem "normie" is simply the other side. So its mostly right-leaning people controlling the meaning of "normie" and they use it to slur the leftist ones.

My definitions are general, broader and include simply anyone over-reliant on norms as generalities.

Which is why my definitions are the most accurate.

But even if you consider these fetid youtubers with their "intellectual" essays, they do converge on common agreed traits of the normies. Like, the vane nature of normies, their attitude of just "follow the program" regardless if it works or doesnt.

Now, in terms of "haute culture" definitions, we have those as well, from acdemia, from scholarly studies done by London School of Economics or World Economic Forum or by Tavistock institute.

Theres also edgy psychologists like LeBon, who defined normies very cruelly.

I was simply saying I believe in my own definitions, I think I can stand in front of 4channers, and also In front of scholars. I have faith in my definitions, because they are general, broad, they dont slur "leftists".

 

[porco-dddio]

Normie is someone who failed to manifest traits of the solitary human, and I consider it an interrupted process of human development.

you be born a kid, and youre forced to be reliant on collective meanings and adults helping you. Bcause you gona learn language (symbols to communicate)and you need others to give you resources, so you implicitly accept society around you or die.

Simple as. But by a process, we solitary humans evolve past that, we begin to invent our own symbols, reinterpret, reframe reality, acquire resources.

Normies, they simply get stuck and rely on norms and traditions and identity templates, they are fundamentally unable to be like us, they got stuck in some past stage of development

 

[Shinrinken]

Well I listened to them they do converge on some common themes. Even if most of the youtubers try to make it seem "normie" is simply the other side. So its mostly right-leaning people controlling the meaning of "normie" and they use it to slur the leftist ones.

My definitions are general, broader and include simply anyone over-reliant on norms as generalities.

Which is why my definitions are the most accurate.

But even if you consider these fetid youtubers with their "intellectual" essays, they do converge on common agreed traits of the normies. Like, the vane nature of normies, their attitude of just "follow the program" regardless if it works or doesnt.

Now, in terms of "haute culture" definitions, we have those as well, from acdemia, from scholarly studies done by London School of Economics or World Economic Forum or by Tavistock institute.

Theres also edgy psychologists like LeBon, who defined normies very cruelly.

I was simply saying I believe in my own definitions, I think I can stand in front of 4channers, and also In front of scholars. I have faith in my definitions, because they are general, broad, they dont slur "leftists".

So you agree with I said, but have to say yours is "more accurate." Which in fact prove my fucking point as people can't decide where the line should be drawn. Acting like yours is the end all be all. Which is what other people do, rather what I said which is a slang term to just fucking other people from outside a group/fandom/hobby/skillset/etc. I swear, if I didn't know better. I would say you're trolling

 

[porco-dddio]

So you agree with I said, but have to say yours is "more accurate." Which in fact prove my fucking point as people can't decide where the line should be drawn. Acting like yours is the end all be all. Which is what other people do, rather what I said which is a slang term to just fucking other people from outside a group/fandom/hobby/skillset/etc. I swear, if I didn't know better. I would say you're trolling

Well I disagree with all definitions, its normal. We have dictionaries that are updated constantly for this reason.

My disagreement about definitions is not same as saying definitions dont exist.

I was saying, you seem to want to get something "fixed in stone" that is unchanging and eternal, but none of our human words is like that, sorry to disappoint.

I also did give you a definition (mine).

 

[Depresso]

Thanks for proving my fucking point.

It's eleven fucking o'clock

 

[Depresso]

Normies are memeable and are walking slur stereotypes