- Joined
- Jun 26, 2024
- Messages
- 252
- Thread Author
- #1
the ethical argument against eating meat always involves making animals seem more like humans.
Ok? what's wrong with eating humans?
you're getting it in some butcher-processed form. cubes, slices, ground, steak. It's not like you're gonna boil a head and have the veal stare at you which would be disgusting even if it was squash that just looked like it had eyes.
It's not like because they have a human slaughterhouse in Texas or Cameroon they're gonna eat you, either. That's like your pet dog getting turned into a hot dog. Not gonna happen in any civilized country with a food regulatory committee.
I do believe animals are sentient beings. A piglet is probably smarter than a larval huiman until about 5 or 6 years of age.
I remember this skinny foid giving a presentation in school about slaughterhouses, disgusting images, like if you saw your parents sex tape. The thing is, I would eat her pussy, but not if she was alive and attached to it.
Ok? what's wrong with eating humans?
you're getting it in some butcher-processed form. cubes, slices, ground, steak. It's not like you're gonna boil a head and have the veal stare at you which would be disgusting even if it was squash that just looked like it had eyes.
It's not like because they have a human slaughterhouse in Texas or Cameroon they're gonna eat you, either. That's like your pet dog getting turned into a hot dog. Not gonna happen in any civilized country with a food regulatory committee.
I do believe animals are sentient beings. A piglet is probably smarter than a larval huiman until about 5 or 6 years of age.
I remember this skinny foid giving a presentation in school about slaughterhouses, disgusting images, like if you saw your parents sex tape. The thing is, I would eat her pussy, but not if she was alive and attached to it.