Essay The earth was created less than 10,000 years ago

[UglyBastard]

It's incredible how evil "scientists" are. They claim that something is 1 million years old, while the earth isn't even that old, lol.
The earth was created less than 10,000 years ago. It's completely impossible for there to be a skull that's 1 million years old.
Anyone who believes in shit like that should take an IQ test just to make sure they're not mentally retarded.
>hur dur, but the dinosaurs
They were buried by the flood at the time of Noah. The Bible contains several passages about giant snakes and lizards that lived among human beings. Also, soft tissue was found in a dinosaur fossil:

Dinosaur Shocker

Probing a 68-million-year-old T. rex, Mary Schweitzer stumbled upon astonishing signs of life that may radically change our view of the ancient beasts

www.smithsonianmag.com

Now explain to me, how the fuck did soft tissue survive for so long? The only explanation is that the dinosaur was fossilised in a very short time, long enough for it not to have had time to decompose all the organic matter.
The fossilisation process can take hundreds of years according to scientists, so how the fuck could the soft tissue have survived out in the open for so long before being fossilised? It's simply impossible.
Another argument that supports this is the hydroplate theory. What happened was that the whole world flooded in a very short time, burying all the dinosaurs and other forms of life that existed at that time. That in itself rules out the idea of a meteor hitting the earth. Tell me, how the fuck did the meteor kill only the fucking dinosaurs, but not, for example, the turtles? Was it a dinophobic meteor? Kek! Honestly, with a little critical thinking you start to see the theory of evolution as a joke and not a serious science.
The Bible wasn't the only book to describe a flood on a global scale. Several societies that had no contact with each other also reported something similar or have some similar history/mythology. Explain to me: how all these people decided to talk about the same thing even though they never had contact with each other?
>hur, this is mythology, I believe in (((science)))
I believe in biblical chronology. You believe the word of some (((scientist))) who told you that dinosaur bones are a quintillion years old even though you can't prove it. You literally have more faith than I do. At least I have faith in an ancient tradition, you have faith in a literal man of modernity whose only achievements have been to subvert society's values and lead us into a degenerate and depraved reality.
>hm, okay, I want to know more about it
Search for the hydroplate theory. Some theorists argue that the Flood of the Bible was a global event that restructured the Earth's surface, which would easily explain many of the geological formations and fossils observed today, without the need for long periods of time. It's literally Occam's Razor in practice.
Also, look up Mount St Helens. It's a very "observable" example of how the formation of sedimentary layers can occur in a short space of time.
Another issue is the decline of the magnetic poles. If the earth really were as old as they say, our magnetic field would have dissipated completely by now, as we can see on other planets.
Also, C14 dating is widely discredited in the scientific community because of the imprecision of the technique.
If you want to delve deeper into this "rabbit hole", I recommend researching radiometric dating and stratigraphic sequencing.
I could go on and on about this, but I don't know if you guys are really interested in continuing the discussion.

 

[n9wiff]

Good read but opinions aren't objective truths.

 

[Tabula Rasa]

Good read but opinions aren't objective truths.

It’s good to keep an open mind about things

 

[gor]

Earth is still young

 

[UglyBastard]

Good read but opinions aren't objective truths.

The objective truth here is that scientists found soft tissue on a dinosaur's fossil. There is literally no explanation for how that soft tissue survived for 65 million years. By the Occam's Razor principle the best explanation would be that the earth and the dinosaurs aren't that old as people think they are.

 

[MongoloidJoe]

Dinosaur fossils have been found the most statistically in
US
China
Argentina

 

[MongoloidJoe]

Does that indicate that the more populated places of the world had more dinosaurs?
Well every continent was joined together at the time

 

[Incel]

View attachment 517
It's incredible how evil "scientists" are. They claim that something is 1 million years old, while the earth isn't even that old, lol.
The earth was created less than 10,000 years ago. It's completely impossible for there to be a skull that's 1 million years old.
Anyone who believes in shit like that should take an IQ test just to make sure they're not mentally retarded.
>hur dur, but the dinosaurs
They were buried by the flood at the time of Noah. The Bible contains several passages about giant snakes and lizards that lived among human beings. Also, soft tissue was found in a dinosaur fossil:

Dinosaur Shocker

Probing a 68-million-year-old T. rex, Mary Schweitzer stumbled upon astonishing signs of life that may radically change our view of the ancient beasts

www.smithsonianmag.com

Now explain to me, how the fuck did soft tissue survive for so long? The only explanation is that the dinosaur was fossilised in a very short time, long enough for it not to have had time to decompose all the organic matter.
The fossilisation process can take hundreds of years according to scientists, so how the fuck could the soft tissue have survived out in the open for so long before being fossilised? It's simply impossible.
Another argument that supports this is the hydroplate theory. What happened was that the whole world flooded in a very short time, burying all the dinosaurs and other forms of life that existed at that time. That in itself rules out the idea of a meteor hitting the earth. Tell me, how the fuck did the meteor kill only the fucking dinosaurs, but not, for example, the turtles? Was it a dinophobic meteor? Kek! Honestly, with a little critical thinking you start to see the theory of evolution as a joke and not a serious science.
The Bible wasn't the only book to describe a flood on a global scale. Several societies that had no contact with each other also reported something similar or have some similar history/mythology. Explain to me: how all these people decided to talk about the same thing even though they never had contact with each other?
>hur, this is mythology, I believe in (((science)))
I believe in biblical chronology. You believe the word of some (((scientist))) who told you that dinosaur bones are a quintillion years old even though you can't prove it. You literally have more faith than I do. At least I have faith in an ancient tradition, you have faith in a literal man of modernity whose only achievements have been to subvert society's values and lead us into a degenerate and depraved reality.
>hm, okay, I want to know more about it
Search for the hydroplate theory. Some theorists argue that the Flood of the Bible was a global event that restructured the Earth's surface, which would easily explain many of the geological formations and fossils observed today, without the need for long periods of time. It's literally Occam's Razor in practice.
Also, look up Mount St Helens. It's a very "observable" example of how the formation of sedimentary layers can occur in a short space of time.
Another issue is the decline of the magnetic poles. If the earth really were as old as they say, our magnetic field would have dissipated completely by now, as we can see on other planets.
Also, C14 dating is widely discredited in the scientific community because of the imprecision of the technique.
If you want to delve deeper into this "rabbit hole", I recommend researching radiometric dating and stratigraphic sequencing.
I could go on and on about this, but I don't know if you guys are really interested in continuing the discussion.

Also, school shootings and mass shootings that aren't gang related are fake with crisis actors. I have a bunch of proof i may make a thread about these fake shootings with evidence provided.

 

[Mathiverse]

There was another theory that says earth was made in today and past never existed, and past were all our imagination

 

[lunin7]

time doesn’t exist

man made symbols mean nothing, simply put we live in same day of the so called Big Bang

 

[PointOfNoReturn]

3 million year old dragon loli

 

[UglyBastard]

time doesn’t exist

man made symbols mean nothing, simply put we live in same day of the so called Big Bang

According to the Jews the earth is actually 6 thousand years old

 

[Sneep]

I remember when I went to the 'Maryland Science Center' in Baltimore a few years ago, there was this display that allowed you to push a button and it made the sound of a dinosaur and I remember thinking to myself 'how the hell would they have any idea what this creature that has been extinct for millions of years, long before human civilization sound like?' The truth is, there's no good explanation and it's just there to rot your brain, essentially. I think the fact they teach it to you from a very young age should be very suspicious too, because if you told a teenager or an adult about dinosaurs with no prior knowledge they'll probably be more skeptical.
Eric Dubay made a great video about dinosaurs;

Dinosaurs are a hoax, there's also this hoax tier animal that they made up to get people to believe in dinosaurs even more and It's clearly CGI but most people seem to think it's real;

 

[LOOKISM-LOGIC]

I remember when I went to the 'Maryland Science Center' in Baltimore a few years ago, there was this display that allowed you to push a button and it made the sound of a dinosaur and I remember thinking to myself 'how the hell would they have any idea what this creature that has been extinct for millions of years, long before human civilization sound like?' The truth is, there's no good explanation and it's just there to rot your brain, essentially. I think the fact they teach it to you from a very young age should be very suspicious too, because if you told a teenager or an adult about dinosaurs with no prior knowledge they'll probably be more skeptical.
Eric Dubay made a great video about dinosaurs;

Dinosaurs are a hoax, there's also this hoax tier animal that they made up to get people to believe in dinosaurs even more and It's clearly CGI but most people seem to think it's real;

Dinosaurs are sus will give you that.

 

[wsada]

Earth's not 10,000 years old

 

[UglyBastard]

Earth's not 10,000 years old

mainstream science claims the Earth is around 4.5 billion years old, but I will outline three key evidences that suggest the Earth is much younger—less than 10,000yo actually, as described in the biblical timeline.
>Soft Tissue in Dinosaur Fossils
First, let’s consider the surprising discovery of soft tissues in dinosaur fossils. In recent years, scientists have found preserved proteins, collagen, and even structures resembling blood cells in fossils supposedly millions of years old. This raises a critical question: How can soft tissues, which are expected to decay in just thousands of years, survive for tens or hundreds of millions of years? From a creationist perspective, this evidence fits perfectly within a timeline of just a few thousand years. While some researchers have proposed mechanisms to explain this preservation, such as iron acting as a preservative, these ideas remain highly speculative. The existence of these tissues challenges the idea of an ancient Earth and instead supports a young Earth model
>Decay of Earth's Magnetic Field
Second, we can look at the Earth’s magnetic field. Scientists have observed that the magnetic field is gradually weakening over time. If we trace this decay backward, it becomes clear that the magnetic field would have been far too strong for life to exist just tens of thousands of years ago—let alone billions. Creationists argue that this decay is consistent with a young Earth that is only about 6,000 years old. In contrast, the mainstream dynamo theory suggests that the magnetic field regenerates itself over time, but this explanation relies on assumptions that are difficult to test. If the magnetic field’s decay is as straightforward as it appears, it provides strong evidence for a young
>Limited Erosion of Geological Features
Finally, let’s talk about erosion and sedimentation. Geological features on Earth, like mountains, river deltas, and sediment layers, show evidence of limited age. For example, if continents have been eroding at the observed rates for billions of years, they should have been worn down to near sea level by now. Likewise, features like the Mississippi River delta show sediment accumulation consistent with only a few thousand years, not millions. Mainstream scientists argue that processes like tectonic uplift or sediment recycling explain this discrepancy, but these arguments often rely on assumptions about the past that can’t be directly observed. From a young Earth perspective, these features make much more sense within a framework of thousands of years, not billions

 

[Ultimate Subhuman]

GoogleSearchcel

 

[UglyBastard]

View attachment 3081
GoogleSearchcel

>he unironically believes the mainstream scientists

 

[Kevin_Logan]

According to the Jews the earth is actually 6 thousand years old

>Listen to what kikes has to say

 

[Ultimate Subhuman]

>he unironically believes the mainstream scientists

God created it. We js discovered it

 

[蟋Xanax㍴Baron蟀]

Yung Earth creationists are chill. I don't see how the age of the earth affects that much in the science we use in our daily lives. They are asking questions and testing theories and there is nothing wrong with that, maybe they are right and it's up to them to prove it, that's what science is all about.

Compared to something like Gender Studies I don't think Young Earth is that fringe. It just gets a bad rap because secular society hates God.

 

[Garou]

It's all bullshit, they claim technology can somehow give them a rough estimate on how long something is, it's total bullshit. No they cannot know something is a million years old, even if we were to hypothetically assume the earth is a million+ years old, they still would not be able to come to that conclusion because technology is not at that level and never will be just because of the nature of such a thing.
I've learnt that scientists and their "theories" are all bullshit, they don't actually know anything. They theorize this and that but it's all speculation and most of it is just not true.

 

[LancasteR]

Scientism has become a whole religion on it's own.
Despite some atheists claiming their beliefs just being believing in the about the absence of God.

 

[UglyBastard]

Scientism has become a whole religion on it's own.
Despite some atheists claiming their beliefs just being believing in the about the absence of God.

I'm still not sure if I am really an atheist. No matter how much I try, I can't simply believe that a powerful being created everything in the blink of an eye. But at the same time, I can't believe what the (((science))) says. Maybe I just need to nourish my faith in God, but even that is not an easy task.
I once wrote here or in .net, don't remember, that I was studying about the Orthodox Christianity, but I still didn't go anywhere. Don't get me wrong, I want to believe, but it's not that easy, specially after 30 years of Marxist and Secularist indoctrination.

 

[Enju]

Everything is about controlling the masses. Take every “study” or “evidence” with a grain of salt