Calculation about what the world population should be

[Deleted member 52]

According to google, 850 million people are white

so on a racial basis alone, I'll say around 1 billion people get to live
I'll reduce the white population to, say 750 million. Probably a little inflated.
200 million or so east asians... China has 1.4 billion people, there's no way all of those deserve to live. Way too many chinks are just soulless drones. Besides, we definitely want more whites than asians
There are billions of shitskins world wide... not every single one is a complete subhuman. If I say there are approx 5 billion of them total, 1% of that should be 50 million, and that's a nice round number for now
Ideally the world would be more white, but whatever

Then we can eliminate everyone with an IQ below 115, around 85% of the population. I know that Asians have higher IQ on average, but their standard deviation is lower, so it should apply to them for the most part too.

That leaves us with 150 million people. We can assume that the gender ratio is around 60/40 male to female, we kill all the women here (will have artificial wombs by then). So, 90 million left.
Considering that a lot of people are geriatric old fucks who don't have much time left anyway (remember that the demographics that I've chosen are all declining in population, with high average age and low birth rates), and the fact that a sizable portion of people are druggies, alcoholics, or various other kinds of losers, maybe around 50 million people deserve to live

Around 0.6% of the population

 

[fatcel_3000]

this is a reptilian mindset.

i don't mean to say that as a good or bad thing, just that this is what reptilian inter-dimensional parasites think.
I suppose it's possible for a human to come to this conclusion independently but I haven't ever heard of such a case. I've had these thoughts until I was able to blast all those ugly little fags out of my body - they can be anywhere, not just in your head. They really are ugly, little bead eyes and don't got no nose, just slits. I'd give them some skin care stuff if i didn't boot them out

they are scared of the worlds human infestation and want them to be reduced to a manageable population so they can roam the earth without getting bullied for being subhumans. That's why they collaborated with the triple letter agencies and the emperor in rome to make a bioweapon to try to destroy china before getting brutally mogged by god. The code name for this in 2010 was the anglo-saxon mission.

the rational argument for "overpopulation" and the mathusian argument only exist because they suppress free energy and other technologies that would scarcity as a general category. Using energy is only bad when u burn "dinosaurs" for it and leave black shit marks in the air.

probably other thoughts "you" have come from those fags too, u gotta flush em out

 

[Deleted member 52]

this is a reptilian mindset.

i don't mean to say that as a good or bad thing, just that this is what reptilian inter-dimensional parasites think.
I suppose it's possible for a human to come to this conclusion independently but I haven't ever heard of such a case. I've had these thoughts until I was able to blast all those ugly little fags out of my body - they can be anywhere, not just in your head. They really are ugly, little bead eyes and don't got no nose, just slits. I'd give them some skin care stuff if i didn't boot them out

they are scared of the worlds human infestation and want them to be reduced to a manageable population so they can roam the earth without getting bullied for being subhumans. That's why they collaborated with the triple letter agencies and the emperor in rome to make a bioweapon to try to destroy china before getting brutally mogged by god. The code name for this in 2010 was the anglo-saxon mission.

the rational argument for "overpopulation" and the mathusian argument only exist because they suppress free energy and other technologies that would scarcity as a general category. Using energy is only bad when u burn "dinosaurs" for it and leave black shit marks in the air.

probably other thoughts "you" have come from those fags too, u gotta flush em out

I had this thought too.. that human population should be high because human dominance is necessary and this is a mark of it

it's not about the population number though, it's about the prevalence of too many subhumans.
If I could turn the demographics of the 50 million into 50 billion, I wouldn't see the problem.

 

[GGWP]

Let me guess, you are one of the good ones that should be saved?
Who are any of us to dictate who should or should not live?
If natural language processing can accurately approximate intelligence why stop at 90 million? Why not just have one God-king ruler of earth and the rest of us be sleeved and replaced by automatons? That would be far more efficient! He could even use his artificial wombs and gene manipulation to produce a small army of hyper-intelligent and subservient slaves! No need for archaic flesh vessels of the 21st century and their archaic brain makeup.
Actually if intelligence is what we are chiefly concerned with preserving and eschewing 'subhumanism' as you put it, let us become supra-human in a Teilhardian sense and stuff all of our thoughts into a mother AI to prune and refine, this way all human experiences are stored and productive without being encumbered by fleshy waste baskets and we can skip the boring part.

It is a circular sort of reasoning; if one wishes to drive humanity forward they would rejoice at automation and progression, but if such automation and progression makes humanity obsolete does this mean humans must stop living because they are useless eaters? I think it is important to take an anthropocentric approach. We struggle because we want to live, so we should live on and grant special status to all humans so that they can fulfill whatever subjective purpose they can come up with.

I do not think sustainability is a major concern to the people who govern our systems (shockingly!).

 

[fatcel_3000]

I had this thought too.. that human population should be high because human dominance is necessary and this is a mark of it

it's not about the population number though, it's about the prevalence of too many subhumans.
If I could turn the demographics of the 50 million into 50 billion, I wouldn't see the problem.

what's wrong with most people being subhumans?

 

[Deleted member 52]

Let me guess, you are one of the good ones that should be saved?

Yes

Who are any of us to dictate who should or should not live?

It's obvious looking at the state of the world.. it's a tragedy that places like Africa even exist. It's not out of hatred, but just pragmatism and desire for something better.

If natural language processing can accurately approximate intelligence why stop at 90 million? Why not just have one God-king ruler of earth and the rest of us be sleeved and replaced by automatons? That would be far more efficient! He could even use his artificial wombs and gene manipulation to produce a small army of hyper-intelligent and subservient slaves! No need for archaic flesh vessels of the 21st century and their archaic brain makeup.
Actually if intelligence is what we are chiefly concerned with preserving and eschewing 'subhumanism' as you put it, let us become supra-human in a Teilhardian sense and stuff all of our thoughts into a mother AI to prune and refine, this way all human experiences are stored and productive without being encumbered by fleshy waste baskets and we can skip the boring part.

What I said before
I don't really want to lower population necessarily, I just want only people of a certain value to live.. the reason I put IQ at 115 is at a measure I think it's relevance ceases beyond a point. I've studied IQ in detail and a lot of people with tested IQ 115-130 are certainly smarter than the vast majority of people. Terman study for example if you wanna look it up, Feynnman's famous score of 125 as well. The nazis also had their IQs tested, and Goering scored 10 points higher than speer.
But, if you look at demographics.. it's clear that on a broader level its fairly relevant. Most statistics will show this, and the race angle as well obviously

It is a circular sort of reasoning; if one wishes to drive humanity forward they would rejoice at automation and progression, but if such automation and progression makes humanity obsolete does this mean humans must stop living because they are useless eaters? I think it is important to take an anthropocentric approach. We struggle because we want to live, so we should live on and grant special status to all humans so that they can fulfill whatever subjective purpose they can come up with.

I've written about this before. I think that we need to evolve. We're animals at the end of the day, and always will be until something fundamental changes. We're very limited, too.

what's wrong with most people being subhumans?

On one level.. it's almost offensive that such things breathe the same air as me, live on the same planet
On another, it'd simply make life and my surroundings better.

but also genocide is pretty cool

 

[fatcel_3000]

On one level.. it's almost offensive that such things breathe the same air as me, live on the same planet
On another, it'd simply make life and my surroundings better.

but also genocide is pretty cool

why is it offensive sub-human creatures like ethnics exist while it isn't offensive sub-human creatures like cockroaches or maggots exist?

you are quite correct that if they all went *POOF* one day life would be better. Any practicable solution has too many wild variables tho

 

[Deleted member 52]

why is it offensive sub-human creatures like ethnics exist while it isn't offensive sub-human creatures like cockroaches or maggots exist?

This is true, but it's sort of like having shit in your room vs random specs of dust
like yeah, both aren't exactly clean, but one is far more blatant, consumes more space, etc. Also there's obviously more of a connection to the idea of humanity, even if I dislike most humans

you are quite correct that if they all went *POOF* one day life would be better. Any practicable solution has too many wild variables tho

There are a few solutions, maybe I will write about this later

 

[Wanted Dead Or Alive]

Trying to kill that many people is wrong. But White People Having their own space separate or away from non Whites isn't.

 

[VioletBlast]

IQ below 115

IQ changes with age, I would say below 100 and a make exception for the whites who are htn looks or higher. would be a waste for them to die. also kill everyone who is ltn looks or lower.
MTN+
Below 50
white
IQ 100 or higher
more girl to men ratio so that we can have harems

 

[Xuelian Baijie]

this is a reptilian mindset.

i don't mean to say that as a good or bad thing, just that this is what reptilian inter-dimensional parasites think.
I suppose it's possible for a human to come to this conclusion independently but I haven't ever heard of such a case. I've had these thoughts until I was able to blast all those ugly little fags out of my body - they can be anywhere, not just in your head. They really are ugly, little bead eyes and don't got no nose, just slits. I'd give them some skin care stuff if i didn't boot them out

they are scared of the worlds human infestation and want them to be reduced to a manageable population so they can roam the earth without getting bullied for being subhumans. That's why they collaborated with the triple letter agencies and the emperor in rome to make a bioweapon to try to destroy china before getting brutally mogged by god. The code name for this in 2010 was the anglo-saxon mission.

the rational argument for "overpopulation" and the mathusian argument only exist because they suppress free energy and other technologies that would scarcity as a general category. Using energy is only bad when u burn "dinosaurs" for it and leave black shit marks in the air.

probably other thoughts "you" have come from those fags too, u gotta flush em out

I had this thought too.. that human population should be high because human dominance is necessary and this is a mark of it

it's not about the population number though, it's about the prevalence of too many subhumans.
If I could turn the demographics of the 50 million into 50 billion, I wouldn't see the problem.

The lizards are right, just look at China and India. Too many people is the worst natural disaster

New Small societies are where its at. give me my pod and my 15 min cities

Trying to kill that many people is wrong. But White People Having their own space separate or away from non Whites isn't.

The right way is not retarded. While eliminating that many people seems excessive to me but it would solve the problem