Back to the topic, faggot.
There is no need for evidence of consciouness, because consciousness is everywhere.
Just because le reddit ultra-materialistic and utilitarian science(tm) cant detect it, does not mean it doesn't exist.
Back to the topic, faggot.
There is no need for evidence of consciouness, because consciousness is everywhere.
Just because le reddit ultra-materialistic and utilitarian science (tm) cant detect it, does not mean it doesn't exist.
Coming from a asinine redditor, that is a plus.
Even rocks have consciousness, because they belong to Earth, and Earth follows the Sun, which means it does have a consciousness of its own.
Coming from a asinine redditor, that is a plus.
Even rocks have consciousness, because they belong to Earth, and Earth follows the Sun, which means it does have a consciousness of its own.
I didn't say we can't prove consciousness exists, I said we can't form a theory on it's origin purely based on biology >yet<. You can't interpret text. Go back to /a/ and /v/ you actual subhuman.
I didn't say we can't prove consciousness exists, I said we can't form a theory on it's origin purely based on biology >yet<. You can't interpret text. Go back to /a/ and /v/ you actual subhuman.
In Chapter 1 of Part 1 of The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, after attempting to critique four interpretations of our contemporary situation (Oswald Spengler, Ludwi…