Are you religious?

[False]

Personally im not

 

[False]

B

 

[Wolfstorm]

Religious in a devotional sense, or in a philosophical sense?

 

[False]

Religious in a devotional sense, or in a philosophical sense?

Both

 

[Wolfstorm]

Both

Then no.

 

[False]

Then no.

Alright

 

[CPT馬冠宇]

Im an anti Islamic religionist

 

[Sorcerer's Dream]

The gnostics were right.

 

[pariah]

I tried to be religious, but couldn't. God's voice does not reach me.

 

[Sorcerer's Dream]

I tried to be religious, but couldn't. God's voice does not reach me.

Might be because there isn't one.

 

[cosmicx16]

Another badge collected eh?

 

[pariah]

Might be because there isn't one.

Cold analysis dictates that there exists a primeval mind from which the emergent minds of man and animal are derived. That, I call God.

 

[Sorcerer's Dream]

Cold analysis dictates that there exists a primeval mind from which the emergent minds of man and animal are derived. That, I call God.

No, it doesn't. Just because we lack the evidence to develop an evolutionary theory of consciousness doesn't mean there was a 'mind' human and animals minds emerged from.

 

[Quintilian]

Personally im not

Yes, experience has shown me that involving yourself in certain spiritual practices will attract a sort of force, if you see only with your senses what is known by the body, you are woefully unprepared what exist beyond common comprehension.

 

[Suigin Trismegistus]

I believe in a higher power, but I don't partake in organized religion, most of which are merely slave/peasant control systems.

 

[pariah]

No, it doesn't. Just because we lack the evidence to develop an evolutionary theory of consciousness doesn't mean there was a 'mind' human and animals minds emerged from.

>evolutionary theory
>of consciousness

Category error. There can be no such thing, for the problems that evolutionary theory is concerned with are of a different kind than that of the mental and the subjective. Note that any talk of the correlates of consciousness can never lead to an explanation of consciousness itself. This becomes self-evident, and as clear as day, once you give it enough thought.

 

[Sorcerer's Dream]

, once you give it enough thought.

Yea I'm gonna ignore and disregard every model and study that ever tried to explain human mind just because 'I had enough thought'

 

[pariah]

Yea I'm gonna ignore and disregard every model and study that ever tried to explain human mind just because 'I had enough thought'

Please, go ahead and show me those models and studies that "explain" the human mind. Did you even understand what I meant when I said that the correlates of consciousness =/= consciousness itself?
Also, if you're gonna act like a smug redditor and do the whole "erm sorry sweaty I'm gonna trust le experts", then you should at least try to learn what the hard problem of consciousness is (read Thomas Nagel's paper, for instance). The "experts", even the materialists among them, actually understand what I'm talking about, while you don't.

 

[Sorcerer's Dream]

Please, go ahead and show me those models and studies that "explain" the human mind. Did you even understand what I meant when I said that the correlates of consciousness =/= consciousness itself?

tried to explain.

Also, if you're gonna act like a smug redditor and do the whole "erm sorry sweaty I'm gonna trust le experts", then you should at least try to learn what the hard problem of consciousness is (read Thomas Nagel's paper, for instance). The "experts", even the materialists among them, actually understand what I'm talking about, while you don't.

bro you based holy he brought the reddit stuff wow so cool. You are literally the same but you trust a book written by goys.

 

[pariah]

You are literally the same but you trust a book written by goys.

No clue what you're even implying here. What book? I'm not a Christian, nor a Muslim, nor anything.