- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 781
- Thread Author
- #1
There was online a while ago a spinoff of anarchy, it was christian anarchy. Their idea is ultimate authority belongs to jizzus and that human claims to political domination are illegitimate or very suspicious.
These people said that jizzus mythology is more relevant than states or rules or laws. And they said also, if you believe in god you become more "rational" in some sense, because you give your loyalty to god and thus you end up not worship idols and electronic celebrities.
They started saying that every human inevitably needs to orient his life with "beliefs". But they had a "solution" lets say. They say, what if you follow god? Then you will be plenty fulfilled and will make you stop confuse finite things with infinite things. You will cease to worship nick griftentes, and assorted equivalent ecelebs.
Governments have functions, but are not divine. Celebrities may be talented, but are not worthy of worship. Technology is a tool, not a source of meaning. That was their social experiment more or less. People associated with this ideology were leo tolstoy and maybe others but dont ask too much I am just the messenger here.
I reasoned, yeah maybe they are right, the belief in god may make you rational, because all of us often like to think we are very "blackpilled" or rational, but we treat things like "state" or "progress" or "equality" as sacred. Maybe faith in god can cure this disease of the brain.
Well, I gave a chance to this meme of christian anrchy, I observed. I didnt want to conclude things too early, it seemed sound theory to me, or at least it seemed a mental experiment that needed some test and observation.
What I observed on the internet is that people who believe in god, often ALSO believe in other things, like the hitler worship community is majority made of god believers.
Or, MAGA, full of god believers, but they idolize trump or jorogan. I do not have have data, I do not want to dismiss their idea, but my current observation seems to point at the idea whoever believes in god, will also believe other things... even things that make incoherent the first belief.
Flat earth community is full of god believers.
Nofap is full of god believers.
All these places of insanity are full of god believers.
Now, I understand, the christian anarchists said if you REALLY believe in god then that will guide you and make you rational. I dont disagree even when I use my redditor atheist perspective, I think if you have a very solid framework to explain reality, or you are a systematizer type of mind, usually you become very good at attuning to reality.
Obviously lots of christians are excellent analysts and shitposters and they are attuned to reality, perhaps they give justice to this idea of christian anarchy. However, I observed in majority of situations, you believe in god, you also believe other things.
Lets observe doomers and chuds, they manifested belief in god... no, godS, more than 1, and more religions as well. They seem to always switch religion, and they prefer the one that they deem "based". What is based changes, its algorithmic. One time was orthodox christianity and then it was islam. So they believe whatever the fuck, and then belive also in hitler and in eliot rodger. They dont seem very "rational" to me. Seems like belief in god did not cure them, they worship ecelebs like nick griftentes, why is that? The theory of christian anarchy seems totally fake. Why belief in ecelebs and political dictatorshit?
But lets imagine this scenario. Theres a chud hallucinating after having consumed algorithmically 16 consecutive hours of redpill on tiktok, then he has a vision and elliot rodger reveals himself in a dream and tells the chud to go around graping married women. But the religion of the chud also says that married women should be left alone. Which of the 2 will the chud follow? Nick fuentes or god?
See, its really impossible to follow idolatry and god at the same time, and yet it happens all the time in chudlands.
This leads me to ask, is the theory completely false. Or, is the theory of christian anarchism true as an abstract norm but it cannot be implemented because people fail to understand it? What if they are "right in theory" and they spotted accurately a human behavior, they can be right saying that humans organize around beliefs. But I think they miss something else, is the fact human cognition may generate at the same time multiple "sacred" committments. God can be ignored and put below nick griftentes.
These multiple commitments can coexist peacefully for years until they come into conflict. Which is it? I dont know. I think the christian anarchy perspective has got a point, but I dont see it wrking. Most people who believe in god, always belive in something else as well. Like, dictatorshit, communism, nazism, trump, you name it.
My independent incel observation is normies gona noooooorm. They always "believe" and god cannot save them, just makes them worse.
These people said that jizzus mythology is more relevant than states or rules or laws. And they said also, if you believe in god you become more "rational" in some sense, because you give your loyalty to god and thus you end up not worship idols and electronic celebrities.
They started saying that every human inevitably needs to orient his life with "beliefs". But they had a "solution" lets say. They say, what if you follow god? Then you will be plenty fulfilled and will make you stop confuse finite things with infinite things. You will cease to worship nick griftentes, and assorted equivalent ecelebs.
Governments have functions, but are not divine. Celebrities may be talented, but are not worthy of worship. Technology is a tool, not a source of meaning. That was their social experiment more or less. People associated with this ideology were leo tolstoy and maybe others but dont ask too much I am just the messenger here.
I reasoned, yeah maybe they are right, the belief in god may make you rational, because all of us often like to think we are very "blackpilled" or rational, but we treat things like "state" or "progress" or "equality" as sacred. Maybe faith in god can cure this disease of the brain.
Well, I gave a chance to this meme of christian anrchy, I observed. I didnt want to conclude things too early, it seemed sound theory to me, or at least it seemed a mental experiment that needed some test and observation.
What I observed on the internet is that people who believe in god, often ALSO believe in other things, like the hitler worship community is majority made of god believers.
Or, MAGA, full of god believers, but they idolize trump or jorogan. I do not have have data, I do not want to dismiss their idea, but my current observation seems to point at the idea whoever believes in god, will also believe other things... even things that make incoherent the first belief.
Flat earth community is full of god believers.
Nofap is full of god believers.
All these places of insanity are full of god believers.
Now, I understand, the christian anarchists said if you REALLY believe in god then that will guide you and make you rational. I dont disagree even when I use my redditor atheist perspective, I think if you have a very solid framework to explain reality, or you are a systematizer type of mind, usually you become very good at attuning to reality.
Obviously lots of christians are excellent analysts and shitposters and they are attuned to reality, perhaps they give justice to this idea of christian anarchy. However, I observed in majority of situations, you believe in god, you also believe other things.
Lets observe doomers and chuds, they manifested belief in god... no, godS, more than 1, and more religions as well. They seem to always switch religion, and they prefer the one that they deem "based". What is based changes, its algorithmic. One time was orthodox christianity and then it was islam. So they believe whatever the fuck, and then belive also in hitler and in eliot rodger. They dont seem very "rational" to me. Seems like belief in god did not cure them, they worship ecelebs like nick griftentes, why is that? The theory of christian anarchy seems totally fake. Why belief in ecelebs and political dictatorshit?
But lets imagine this scenario. Theres a chud hallucinating after having consumed algorithmically 16 consecutive hours of redpill on tiktok, then he has a vision and elliot rodger reveals himself in a dream and tells the chud to go around graping married women. But the religion of the chud also says that married women should be left alone. Which of the 2 will the chud follow? Nick fuentes or god?
See, its really impossible to follow idolatry and god at the same time, and yet it happens all the time in chudlands.
This leads me to ask, is the theory completely false. Or, is the theory of christian anarchism true as an abstract norm but it cannot be implemented because people fail to understand it? What if they are "right in theory" and they spotted accurately a human behavior, they can be right saying that humans organize around beliefs. But I think they miss something else, is the fact human cognition may generate at the same time multiple "sacred" committments. God can be ignored and put below nick griftentes.
These multiple commitments can coexist peacefully for years until they come into conflict. Which is it? I dont know. I think the christian anarchy perspective has got a point, but I dont see it wrking. Most people who believe in god, always belive in something else as well. Like, dictatorshit, communism, nazism, trump, you name it.
My independent incel observation is normies gona noooooorm. They always "believe" and god cannot save them, just makes them worse.
