- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 1,681
- Thread Author
- #1
I collected some ideas from 3 of my shitposts how we can deal with the problem of soycide and the ideology of antinatalism.
My method to deal with soycide isnt prevention. And I think society should consider adopting my method.
I describe it shortly: we pay a portion of students in philosphy university for a side job, we simply ask them to mindrape suicide candidates. Our task isnt to prevent suicide but to redirect it. In other words I want to reconsider all current approaches and utilize the already present structures in society instead of creating new ones.
The suicidee will have some reasons, I cannot list all suicide reasons. Muh life is bad, muh I listened to a conspiracy on youtube, muh women... WHO GIVES A FUCK
I dont even care. But we have more relevant questions ahead of us and we shouldnt care about their subjective experience of suicide ideations. We care about what is the social cost, what potential expansions of bureaucracy it causes, what we pay collectively, what power does it gives to unwanted classes of adjudicators.
The method is simple: the suicidee persents his ideas. The ideas are ground on a logic wheel, and shown to be incorrect. If the sucidee still wants to soycide, hes free to do it with his own shotgun, I will never pay for it. His motivations will be rejected, considered invalid. If somone is on a wheelchair, he can still bite his own tongue. If someone is a vegetable then we can discuss minutia and details... But for majority of people, we just grind them on a logic wheel, and force only 1 option: DIY or get fucked.
If the procedure is rejected by the suicidee (most likely because hes lowIQ), we can also offer alternatives. We can offer him to forfeit his life in a way that is socially advantageous.
For example, become a labrat for corporations, become a mercenary, allow us to use his body to experiment something. Or be reduced to slavery and mind programmed using electrocution + barbiturates so we give him a new personality. Anything, so long is voluntary, and chosen by someone who wanted to soycide.
There have to be alternative options other than just soycide for people who voluntarily forfeit their life. I find it a waste of human flesh to simply let them die... it would be much better to rip their body and sell their organs and test all sorts of drugs on them.
In other words I think we have to do enforced freedom. Lots of normies reject freedom, which makes them suitable for death. But it should not be on their terms, on our terms instead. This is how we can maintain freedom to choose your own annihilation, plus our freedom to live without unnecessary bureaucracy. We offer them a choice: a meaningless death on their own terms, or a meaningful death on the system terms.
If the normie was not suited for our life, there was also the option to go in another place, maybe in an african village, or maybe in china or in india. This is another option to offer. As society I think lots would be happy to pay a ticket with tax money, to get rid of people who resent our way of living.
Many times they say they hate the west, they resent freedom. Then why they dont go away? We can easily arrange boats to emigrate soycide candidates, if they chose it as an option. So long we force them to do a choice... any choice is valid.
In other words, some people dont like to do choices. But our society and our way of life should be ruthless. We force everyone to do a choice, and then anything they choose is valid, even their own death. So long we dont live with the consequences is cool. I dont want a class of adjudicators and life coach and grifters of the dead. Grfiting the living was bad enough.
My method to deal with soycide isnt prevention. And I think society should consider adopting my method.
I describe it shortly: we pay a portion of students in philosphy university for a side job, we simply ask them to mindrape suicide candidates. Our task isnt to prevent suicide but to redirect it. In other words I want to reconsider all current approaches and utilize the already present structures in society instead of creating new ones.
The suicidee will have some reasons, I cannot list all suicide reasons. Muh life is bad, muh I listened to a conspiracy on youtube, muh women... WHO GIVES A FUCK
I dont even care. But we have more relevant questions ahead of us and we shouldnt care about their subjective experience of suicide ideations. We care about what is the social cost, what potential expansions of bureaucracy it causes, what we pay collectively, what power does it gives to unwanted classes of adjudicators.
The method is simple: the suicidee persents his ideas. The ideas are ground on a logic wheel, and shown to be incorrect. If the sucidee still wants to soycide, hes free to do it with his own shotgun, I will never pay for it. His motivations will be rejected, considered invalid. If somone is on a wheelchair, he can still bite his own tongue. If someone is a vegetable then we can discuss minutia and details... But for majority of people, we just grind them on a logic wheel, and force only 1 option: DIY or get fucked.
If the procedure is rejected by the suicidee (most likely because hes lowIQ), we can also offer alternatives. We can offer him to forfeit his life in a way that is socially advantageous.
For example, become a labrat for corporations, become a mercenary, allow us to use his body to experiment something. Or be reduced to slavery and mind programmed using electrocution + barbiturates so we give him a new personality. Anything, so long is voluntary, and chosen by someone who wanted to soycide.
There have to be alternative options other than just soycide for people who voluntarily forfeit their life. I find it a waste of human flesh to simply let them die... it would be much better to rip their body and sell their organs and test all sorts of drugs on them.
In other words I think we have to do enforced freedom. Lots of normies reject freedom, which makes them suitable for death. But it should not be on their terms, on our terms instead. This is how we can maintain freedom to choose your own annihilation, plus our freedom to live without unnecessary bureaucracy. We offer them a choice: a meaningless death on their own terms, or a meaningful death on the system terms.
If the normie was not suited for our life, there was also the option to go in another place, maybe in an african village, or maybe in china or in india. This is another option to offer. As society I think lots would be happy to pay a ticket with tax money, to get rid of people who resent our way of living.
Many times they say they hate the west, they resent freedom. Then why they dont go away? We can easily arrange boats to emigrate soycide candidates, if they chose it as an option. So long we force them to do a choice... any choice is valid.
In other words, some people dont like to do choices. But our society and our way of life should be ruthless. We force everyone to do a choice, and then anything they choose is valid, even their own death. So long we dont live with the consequences is cool. I dont want a class of adjudicators and life coach and grifters of the dead. Grfiting the living was bad enough.
