Discussion If you could rule a nation, what kind of systems would you impose?

[GGWP]

People often decry neoliberal capitalism as if it's the worst system you could possibly live under. I am just curious as to what alternative systems you would advocate for in its stead. For instance, I have heard people say that they would like to live on a traditional homestead with a cute wife, or that they would thrive under a communist utopia, and of course we are seeing a modern resurgence in National Socialism given a want for higher moral principle. Let us assume then that you are now crowned as the emperor a moderately-sized nation in relative peace and that other nations are also peaceful but there is a non-zero possibility of war, whatever you say goes...

If you had complete control over your own nation, what kind of economic and moral systems would you put in place?

 

[neet]

the women would be forced to have sex with me and me only. men would be forcefully transitioned into femboys, otherwise they’d be executed

 

[GGWP]

the women would be forced to have sex with me and me only. men would be forcefully transitioned into femboys, otherwise they’d be executed

I just want to take a moment to thank you for letting me see the light, I am officially resigning from forums to move on to better things. Adios!

 

[Magonia]

I play Democracy 4
I go lib right every time
I usually do things like remove government pensions, reduce military spending, and radically expand the federal police force early in my first term. End game i tend to have no press freedom, president for life, UBI and most taxes replaced by carbon and sales tax.

 

[bell]

I like the adversarial system. I'm not engaged enough on this topic to provide a meaningful answer though. I don't have a great deal of power in steering preferences, just as a matter of course. However I'd like to think that I reserve the power to dictate the choices that people make, so that even those which "aren't up for compromise" are up for grabs. I like having that left to the political process rather than a reserved injunctive norm. I'd probably start by maximizing the powers of an incel underclass while giving vanguards more power.

On certain matters though I think concurrent powers are better (such as in budgetary regulation), especially if they lean toward executive fiat, so judicial capture and the presence of the state in all public bodies would be necessary to limit the rule of factions.
The recent bill passed washed out the presence of internal factions in the conservative bloc. It's all Trumpism now. I like that. Or I think that funds that go toward border security and ICE are a good thing, actually. I don't believe in independent agencies or non-acquiescence doctrines. I also don't believe in a Thayerian Congress. All of this can be instrumentalized toward a greater social good. That to me is flushing out people I don't like.

I don't really have a name for what I believe in, it's all a bit too muddled in my brain. I'd probably set up something similar to Israel (right-wing sovereign ethnostate, outsource legacy populations to more powerful countries in order to work NGOs). Or Singapore, penal reform and all. There's a lot more I would do but I'm not nearly enough of a sperg to care about the logistics, it just sounds nice in my head.