Religion Is all violence evil ?

[Raul and the Kings Of Lame]

Or is there such a thing as good violence ?

 

[methos]

the crusades were cool and based so yes

but on a deeper level, a perfectly good being wouldn't bring harm to another. However there is violence in the name of good. The means of achievement arent good (violence), but the end goal is good. Feel like depends on the person if this qualifies as good violence, but personally violence itself is never good.

 

[the_deaf_judger]

Or is there such a thing s good violence ?

Violence is only admissible if it is non-coercive.

 

[Raul and the Kings Of Lame]

Violence is only admissible if it is non-coercive.

What ?

 

[the_deaf_judger]

What ?

As long as you arent forcing/persuading someone to do something using violence, it is ok.

 

[Sovereign]

Or is there such a thing as good violence ?

There is a difference between force and violence, when you don't have your grammar mastered you can't tell the difference between what is a harmful behavior from an unharmful one. Violence causes harm on purpose, force does not. To answer your question, Violence is wrong in all cases & force is not.

 

[Raul and the Kings Of Lame]

There is a difference between force and violence, when you don't have your grammar mastered you can't tell the difference between what is a harmful behavior from an unharmful one. Violence causes harm on purpose, force does not. To answer your question, Violence is wrong in all cases & force is not.

How is force different than violence ?

 

[Sovereign]

How is force different than violence ?

Force is in defense of someone or something and does not cause willful harm, violence is on purpose and causes harm willful.

 

[MelaninWarlord]

How is force different than violence ?

Stfu low T italian

 

[Raul and the Kings Of Lame]

Force is in defense of someone or something and does not cause willful harm, violence is on purpose and causes harm willful.

Okay thanks I see.

 

[Lokki]

Or is there such a thing as good violence ?

Violence is always evil, because of the definition of violence.

behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
"violence erupted, resulting in injuries and deaths"

Physical force is not always evil in violence the specific type of force used is always evil

 

[yeetbender]

Life itself would collapse without a necessary degree of violence.

 

[Suigin Trismegistus]

Counter proposition: can non-violence be evil? Can it lead to evil outcomes?

 

[Strategic Nervous System]

There is no such thing as Evil, Evil is absence of good. the good violence is a way to achieve good. Holy Wars, such as Crusades were example of it.

 

[Strategic Nervous System]

Counter proposition: can non-violence be evil? Can it lead to evil outcomes?

non-violence is evil because it's anti-productive. not producing anything good is ultimate form of selfishness. Buddhism is very evil in that sense.
Their only way to become happy is complete dissociation from reality, which only leads to worst outcome for everyone. that's why the depiction of buddhist hell is so sadistically psychopathic.
Buddhism might be a way out for lot of NEET but ultimately it's a cope, but I might be very biased toward it since I'm from Shinto-Buddhist country of Japan.
So the way for us to be happy = Buddhist Escapism.
the way for us to achieve anything = Martyrdom.

 

[Strategic Nervous System]

non-violence is evil because it's anti-productive. not producing anything good is ultimate form of selfishness. Buddhism is very evil in that sense.
Their only way to become happy is complete dissociation from reality, which only leads to worst outcome for everyone. that's why the depiction of buddhist hell is so sadistically psychopathic.
Buddhism might be a way out for lot of NEET but ultimately it's a cope, but I might be very biased toward it since I'm from Shinto-Buddhist country of Japan.
So the way for us to be happy = Buddhist Escapism.
the way for us to achieve anything = Martyrdom.

Pacifism is selfish and evil religion for weak, Therefore Japan is not only weak but also selfish and evil. it try compensate for suffering of other nation by forcing suffering upon it's own people--for what?
it does not recognize that is no lesser evil than forcing suffering upon people of other nation. it forces suffering upon ANYONE! a nation of slave by slave, and for slave.
Their areligious attitude only makes it worse because it does not allow meaning upon such suffering.
Pacifism is allowing yourself to taken advantage of others, it is turning yourself into a tool without creating it's own value.
Japan is the worst example of characteristic you can have as a person, a Lot can be learned by looking at how they have been slave puppy of America ever since TWO NUKES. yes we are still butthurt about it but still loves sucking uncle sam's dick, such a pathetic weak willed people.

 

[Suigin Trismegistus]

non-violence is evil because it's anti-productive. not producing anything good is ultimate form of selfishness. Buddhism is very evil in that sense.
Their only way to become happy is complete dissociation from reality, which only leads to worst outcome for everyone. that's why the depiction of buddhist hell is so sadistically psychopathic.
Buddhism might be a way out for lot of NEET but ultimately it's a cope, but I might be very biased toward it since I'm from Shinto-Buddhist country of Japan.
So the way for us to be happy = Buddhist Escapism.
the way for us to achieve anything = Martyrdom.

I was the originally thinking about "the road to hell is paved in good intentions" which is the motif that plagues the West with socialism/liberalism, but what you have stated is also true. Total detachment and failure to act in the face of evil can lead to even greater evil.

 

[Suigin Trismegistus]

Japan is the worst example of characteristic you can have as a person, a Lot can be learned by looking at how they have been slave puppy of America ever since TWO NUKES. yes we are still butthurt about it but still loves sucking uncle sam's dick, such a pathetic weak willed people.

For what it's worth, once the Yen carry trade is unwound, Japan may finally be set free from an economic standpoint. Trump recently stated that he's ready to dissolve the postwar governing council over Japan. Hope you've stacked gold and silver though.

 

[Strategic Nervous System]

For what it's worth, once the Yen carry trade is unwound, Japan may finally be set free from an economic standpoint. Trump recently stated that he's ready to dissolve the postwar governing council over Japan. Hope you've stacked gold and silver though.

The only way for Japan to achieve any degree of significance is through National Shintoism, and failing that meant they will not achieve anything of significance for rest of universe cycle.

Japan is unique because not only it has the underdevelopment of culture often seen in Barbarian World(hence "traditionalist" image of Japan, In fact they have not stepped out of Pagan days) , but the Slave mentality of more developed system as well.
In other words, it means They don't have the individual will of Celts/Germans Nor the Development of Greeks/Romans.

The Lack of individual free will means Japan naturally has more affinity for Socialism, and being Ethnostate means They also have high affinity with Racial Nationalism.
But they don't see it since They are America's slave puppy the chinese has been feeling hungry about. The lack of free will makes them susceptible for foreign manipulation by both jewish and non-jewish media.
It's a despicable nation of Slaves doomed to fall apart, because The slaves cannot be red-pilled. You won't see the sheer amount of sociopathic hatred on Schizophrenics and "Conspiracy Theorist" internalized in each one of them unless you ARE in fact one of them.