The grifter teaching method.

[porco-dddio]

There are various fundamentally different teaching methods. For the time being I consider only 2 of them.

First method is consider teaching a temporary situation. The greatest accomplishment a teacher can obtain is becoming unnecessary, seeing his student surpass him and obtain on his own methods of learning. At first the teacher spoonfeeds the kid, but later he sees the kid learning to do his own research and improving his abilities to think and write. The teacher has nothing else to teach, he became redundant and this is a good thing.

This method showcases the truth that authority is only temporary, until a human reaches full adult qualities and stands equal (because he can challenge and win) in front of adults, then you no longer need to "transmit knowledge" because the kid generates his own knowledge without you.

Grifter morality is opposite, its operating on a purely egalitarian and communist logic. The grifter income and prestige depends on maintaining an audience rather than creating adults that surpass him. Consequently, the ideal follower is one who is always "almost there", meaning some imbecile that keeps getting grifted, keeps consuming new slop, new ideoligies like "nofap" or whatever it is the latest fashionable vegan "triggered" bullshit for the masses.

Instead of being initiated, the grifted losers are treated like babies, offered no path of improvement and no direction in life.

In the grifting model of teaching, info is diluted. What could be given in 30 pages of incel essay, is instead diluted in 200 youtube videos focused on parasocial bondin and forming relationshit with the grifter leader.
Take the example of huberman: no normie is told how to obtain the knowledge he has, nobody is told that MIT has got free courses, free lectures. Nobody is offered the option to follow some online university or open-courses in his local academia. Nobody is told a list of books to read, nobody is given any tool to construct the information.
The info given to plebeians is frustratingly incomplete, so that they will always depend on "the source" of grifting. Success as consequence is presented as requiring continuous proximity to the teacher rather than mastering a bunch of first principles and obtain ability to do your own research. This puts grifted sheeple on an even lower moral level compared to Q-Anon. At least their mantra was "do your own research" which is completely legit (if you ignore the other Qanon flaws).

The result of grifter immorality is a culture of perennial childhood. Adults want to live forever, they want to be "spiritual", and often they get into childish bullshit like buddhism or coping with jewsus. There is no paradox here, because this is what the immoral ideology of "egalitarianism" teaches to the retards. It teaches hierarchy.

But the hiearchy isnt here because the teacher grifter possesses infinite knowledge and supreme morality. The grifter isnt god, hes just a fucking grifter. Its simply a social relationship sold to the gregarious sheeple. They sell you "social life" as if a product that can be sold. This is the true paradox, not the presence of hierarchy.

Grifter morality celebrates "retention". This is their jargon. If you dont believe me, then believe marketing. They use the word "retention" ad nauseam, its their main mantra.

In the past we were used to celebrate triumph and achievement. If a pupil abandons you because he matured faster or surpassed you early, you would be inclined to be happy, maybe a bit nostalgic but deeply happy. Because you did a good job as a teacher.

Now, we got this bullshit "retention" ideology, and everyone around us is a child. Everyone is stupid. Egalitarianism caused it all.

 

[Wolfstorm]

I support the grifters, because they cause the npc, the midwit, to lose money.
If you dont do your own research, you deserve to lose money to a grifter.
The internet has a lot of information. Still the npc want it chewed down by a scammer.
And when someone do real work, and ask for money, the same npc get mad and want it for free.

 

[porco-dddio]

I support the grifters, because they cause the npc, the midwit, to lose money.
If you dont do your own research, you deserve to lose money to a grifter.
The internet has a lot of information. Still the npc want it chewed down by a scammer.
And when someone do real work, and ask for money, the same npc get mad and want it for free.

yes theres curious laws of grifting that we can observe.

First aw is the Law of perpetual dependence, where grifters produce permanent followers, they call it "audience retention", its their express goal in life.

Second law of grifting is hierarchical concentration. They create a pyramid, it may take some time but in the end only the most psychopatic remains. Who remains are only those who hoard more prestige, money, political power, widest audiences.

Third law is manufactured scarcity. They cannot sell knowledge if its abundant. They have to convince their audience to not use abundant free services like their local library, internet education, free open-courses. So that their audience are compelled to only listen to the grifter.

4th law is delayed actualization. The normie has to be convinced whatever the grifter is promising is "about to come" but it never comes. They are led to believe they are making progress, but also intermittently shamed. Bit of lovebombing, bit of peer pressure and shame. If mixed together produces dependent losers.

And final and fifth law of grifting: Whoever produces genuine content harms them. Preserving their authority takes precedence above everything else. So they always mobilize their audience against true science.

These laws are cool to observe, but I can hardly consider them "good", unless youre some sick "accelerationist". I think you wont have luck organizing an "accelerationist" group. Because grifting is so much destructive it also hurts people at the margins of society, people who may have been capable to "rebuild society" instead will be crippled by grifting.