Layout Options

Which layout option do you want to use?

Color Schemes

Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.

Something about normies behavioural patterns and treatment towards me my entire life just clicked for me

The Enlightened One
Joined
Jun 6, 2025
Messages
45
I was asking AI some questions then started describing events that happened to me throughout my life, situations of normies downplaying or failing to acknowledge any time I outperformed them in order to maintain their illusions of superiority because it would threaten their sense of hierarchy to accept that some guy who doesn't give a fuck about the hierarchy is simply more competent than them.
As I delved more into it I realized that there were countless examples where normies engaged in cognitive dissonance to avoid acknowledging me in any way.

In instances where I would dominate at sports in school, people would ignore it and there would still be social status obsessed faggots complaining if I was starting on the school team ahead of them.
In PE if I score 3 goals from 4 shots nobody says a thing about it.
If the actual mute tiny guy makes one tackle during the game, people are raving about it and praise him because they know he doesn't threaten their position
If the loud retard gives the ball away 10 times and takes 10 shots from retarded positions and one manages to go in, everyone raves about it afterwards.

In class some midwit guy who was shit at sports but a studycel who always had his homework done and would look for extra work was seen as the smart guy people wanted to copy the answers from despite me getting the highest results in the class across subjects.
He builds his identity around one thing while being shit at everything else so people label him as the thing he dedicates himself to.

When I lived with house party having druggies in uni, I was getting the most slays and doing it through tinder and nightclubs which they were aware of but they just chose to ignore/downplay it and act like they were still the higher value ones because of "muh social circle" even though they couldn't slay through clubs/tinder.

Once there were some random foids in the kitchen for an afters and one approached me and started gushing over my height and once the interaction ended one of the normies was like "who the fuck is that?" in a disapproving tone as if to suggest that a decently hot foid shouldn't be allowed in the house (their way to cope because she showed interest to a guy who's not in the status hierarchy)Normies simply can't accept that the guy who doesn't give a fuck about the hierarchy (or isn't limited to just one strength they base their identity around while being shit at everything else) can just be inherently superior to them, they need a cope to keep their egos intact.

There was a poster on another forum who lived in the same country as me so was well aware of the retardation of NT status seeking normies here in particular, we will call him "Fred"
He was some 6'3 guy with a massive frame but was seen as having low social status in school.
He said that in school they had some cross country race and at the start line the normies were saying "My money's on you Fred" while laughing in a mocking way because the thought of some guy who's low in the status hierarchy winning was comical to them.
(In the normies mind you can't separate social status from competence, if someone without social status proves they are the most competent, their mind malfunctions because they see it as a glitch they simply can't process)
He said he ended up winning by a mile and nobody said anything about it afterwards of course.

On my school sports day when I was in my final year, we had some inflatable thing with 2 platforms where you had to knock the other person off their platform with a spongey thing you hit them with.
Of course the NT normies were all having a go, thinking they were great then I decided to challenge them and none of them could beat me and I could see it hurt their egos so badly and one guy started trying to cheat when he knew he couldn't beat me and started trying to drag me down with him when I was knocking him off.
They all then lost interest in that game and decided to go something else, they were probably murmering "that game is shite anyway"

There were far more examples and it was a repeated trend constantly throughout my life.
It started to make me think normies are legit just algorithm controlled and void of free will because they can't recognize reality if it would lead to them questioning their own worth.

On the occasions when I do get some recognition, there are common elements on the reason for it

1. Either they have a similar sentience level:
High IQ maths teacher brings me on as a sub for a few minutes for the school football team then starts me for the next game ahead of a social status obsessed crybaby because the teacher recognized my positional awareness was miles ahead of the crybaby and I kept getting free even if pricks wouldn't pass me the ball because I wasn't in their circle.

2. They don't see themselves in direct competition to me because they can accept I mog them:
This happens in nightlife environments where some guy who's physically average or below starts praising me and does it from a subordinate position because he vocally recognizes the mog.
I wish them all the best though and try to avoid leaving an impression that I adhere to the "alpha" and subordinate hierarchy.

3. They are comfortable in themselves and understand there is plenty of room for both of us to succeed:
These are usually guys who are goodlooking or tall and above average facially themselves, my existence doesn't threaten their sense of self because they see us as both having traits we can relate to each other on.

4. They are foids so not in competition with me
Foids have always given me a higher evaluation of my looks than the people in the PSL community
My instinctive understanding of the kind of males faces that appeal the most to foids is high, for PSLers however it's generally low and they have always had retarded outlooks such as "but this androgonous looking gay alien is actually a model, that means women should like him more than a harmonious tradie with a good tan who slays in the real world"

5. Even forum users abandon all logical consistency to keep the rating of others lower than their own
I've had PSLers discuss their forumlas for who mogs who when talking about men who are random strangers, and in these cases mogger height is treated as the holy grail.

They then perform the cognitive dissonance to say that lack of height doesn't matter for them because it's all about face, while also expressing the view that if they were 6'4 they'd be the ultimate unstoppable slayer, while failing to address the point that I don't slay at 6'4 despite being unanimously agreed upon as HTN pre surgery (proving it's not for lack of face)

It was also agreed that the morphs I made pre surgery would ascend me to chadlite facially, I get the exact result that looks like the morphs and suddenly I get retroactively downgraded so that they can cap my ceiling at a HTN post surgery, but my height doesn't propel me to a higher mogger status than them while it supposedly would make them a demi God if they had it while it makes every stranger with 6'4 height a terra Chad

The damage this trend throughout my life has had on my mental state is that I repeatedly see clear evidence that proves I am superior to these normies fucks yet they all refuse to acknowledge it while acknowledging the exploits of other non sentient normies which pales in comparison.

There comes a point where I just can't understand how normies are able to create an entirely different interpretation of reality so I start to think, maybe I'm over estimating myself in the areas that are more subjective / open to interpretation.

I would say the area that it's easiest to question myself is in relation to my face because facial level is open to interpretation and I did have a legit failo at one point of a malocclusion which destroyed my self image as I knew it's impossible to cope your way out of a craniofacial deformity despite still having success with foids

Upon discovering recently that my facial ratios are almost all within the ideal range (according to the formula of faceIQlabs) giving me a near perfect harmony score, it has made me think that maybe people were just gaslighting me the whole time about my appearance to act like I look worse than I actually do because they have done it for literally EVERY OTHER aspect of life that I dominate them in.
It just worked better on me for face since I had a legit weak point pre surgery that would allow me to accept others strategically dishonest under evaluation.

My front harmony score from a pic taken when I had an underbite is near perfect (0.001%) as is my post surgery pic which got a slightly higher score
My side harmony score from a pre surgery pic is top 11% while post surgery is top 0.6%
I take these with a grain of salt but these geezers who have gaslighted me about my looks get sub 50th percentile harmony scores while using identical measuring accuracy to what I used for myself

Something that I brushed off when it happened but still made me question things, was the reaction my friends and family had when they seen me for the first time after my surgery.
One sister said "what did he look like before, I can't remember"
another said "your chin looks different"
While another one who asked to see pics which I sent with the text "still a bit swollen" responded with "yeah you are swollen"
My best irl friend didn't even make a remark about the change the next time I seen him, as if it never happened despite it being a topic in our convos for ages.

These are examples where there is absolutely no hierarchy on the line, yet none of them could bring themselves to say "it looks good" or "nice, are you happy with it?"
I was met with pure emotionless responses with just analytical observation of "your chin looks different / yeah it's still swollen" and complete avoidance of the topic or not being able to acknowledge that anything changed.

I'm not one who wants people to lie to me just because they think that would keep me happy while hiding their true opinions, but I can't help but feel like if they knew someone who actually had a bad result, they would lie to them and say it was good, whereas if the person had a good result, they would enthusiastically tell them it's a good result.
The lack of emotional intelligence on display to give the responses they gave to me told me there's something much deeper at play here.
Every normie on earth no matter how closely related, sees you on a hierarchical basis in relation to you.
Them seeing that I improved and was now happier with myself after a major investment and pain to get to that point, left them thinking "he doesn't look the same as the guy we used as the butt of the jokes anymore, if he changes his view of himself, that changes the current structure I am comfortable with where I see myself above him in the family hierarchy"

Fuck normies they are algorithm controlled automatons

I will be enhancing my self glazing going forward and never again allow any normie to make me doubt myself

This is why close family members such as sisters will always question any idea you have for a business, because normies feed off making others (particularly sentient ones) doubt themselves, that's their life force.
They despise when a sentient one shows conviction in their beliefs because they have none, they can only feel secure by dragging you down to their level.

If I could sum up normies with a single motto, it would be "You're not as good as you think you are"
Because that's their get out of jail free card they can use to allow them to cling onto their position by trying to set doubt into the mind of someone who's better than them.
It's effective because there will be cases where trying to claim you are bad at something when you're actually good will be too reality denying for it to have any effect on you, but by telling you that you aren't as good as you think you are (in other words, their way of saying they recognize others as being better than you while you are unable to see it) makes you question things because it makes you wonder if you have a lapse in your perception and are missing something that others can see.

I've lost count of the amount of times recently I've been talking to an average looking foid on a dating app and it's usually them who will ask to take the convo to snapchat which I agree to.
I send them a snap of my face then they start saying that they think I'm fake and start looking for more proof, I tell them that's ridiculous since live snaps can't be faked but I prove I'm real beyond any doubt then they will often still claim that they refuse to believe I'm not fake which is just a cope to give them an excuse not to send a snap back due to fear I'll reject them.
Some will snap back if they genuinely change their mind from thinking I'm fake to believing I'm real but others wont bring up that whole debacle and will simply ghost me once I send a snap of my face first without them sending one back so that they can reject me before risking the ego blow which would be me rejecting them.

Every normie / PSLer (indistinguishable at this point) would say "yOU jUSt doN't LOok CHaD eNOUgh bRO" in response to any ghosting you receive since their entire mantra is to tell you you're not good enough, the foid wanted/chose someone better.
They always frame the battle as the real person who they're giving feedback to isn't good enough, but the hypothetical man who outcompeted you is better.
This way they get to drag you down while recognizing the superiority of a non existent hypothetical man
This way they get to exercise their crabs in a bucket desires by bringing you down without having to elevate a real person, thus they're trying to push you beneath them, without having to raise anyone above themselves.

From now on I will completely disregard hypotheticals such as the supposed man who she ditched you for.
Unless you actually have proof of the existence of the specific man she ditched you for, this hypothetical mindset of inadequacy is cope when you yourself are a being that's an utter anomaly in the positive sense
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 20, 2025
Messages
19
Read every word. Didnt quite understand.
So basically:
- You have repeatedly outperformed your normie peers, but they consistently downplayed/ignored you
- Most people will always distort reality to avoid admitting your superiority
- All negative/ambiguous feedback is jealousy, projection, or insecurity
Everything you are writing has that same obsession of hierarchy you attribute to other ppl. You are accusing normies of doing everything you are doing. Your superiority is fixed and all reactions orbit around it.
[I think] this is unfalsifiable:
- ppl praise you = honestly
- people dont praise = threatened
- foid ghosts you = insecure
- fren reacts neutrally = protecting hierachy
If every reaction falls into the same narrative [about hierarchy], then you’re not actually learning anything. you’re just reinforcing a belief you already decided on. There is no response to be made here
 
Last edited:
The Enlightened One
Joined
Jun 6, 2025
Messages
45
Read every word. Didnt quite understand.
So basically:
- You have repeatedly outperformed your normie peers, but they consistently downplayed/ignored you
- Most people will always distort reality to avoid admitting your superiority
While they recognize the supposed superiority of others in a given field who are no threat to them because the supposed superior ones only have that one trait which they base their identity around, they are in a box which they cannot exceed so they're allowed to be recognized for that one trait.

- All negative/ambiguous feedback is jealousy, projection, or insecurity
It doesn't mean ALL negative/ambiguous feedback is jealousy, projection, or insecurity, I can accept instances of such feedback when it does reflect reality.
When retroactively connecting the dots of feedback towards me throughout my life, I noticed the pattern where any positive feedback towards me was withheld in situations where I dominated against normies but was given to others who were seen as no threat or were well established in the hierarchy when they were able to do similar or less than me.

Everything you are writing has that same obsession of hierarchy you attribute to other ppl. You are accusing normies of doing everything you are doing. Your superiority is fixed and all reactions orbit around it.

I don't see how what I'm writing has the same obsession with hierarchy.
I am only discussing the hierarchy because normies deny judging by merit in order to reserve approval for those who don't upset the existing hierarchy
I didn't form my thoughts on why people were reacting to me the way they were in real time.
I just questioned afterwards how it was such a consistent pattern that normies would actively ignore it when I achieved the most in a field that was objectively measurable, while they'd praise others for their displays of competence in certain fields while not objectively being the best.
I didn't give a fuck about receiving any positive feedback to them, I just couldn't understand how they could invest so much into verbalizing that x person was amazing in a certain field, when I was getting objectively better outcomes in that field, and my thread explained the reasons why they did this.
I don't see what more I'd need to explain

[I think] this is unfalsifiable:
- ppl praise you = honestly
- people dont praise = threatened
- foid ghosts you = insecure
- fren reacts neutrally = protecting hierachy
If every reaction falls into the same narrative about hierarchy, then you’re not actually learning anything about people. you’re just reinforcing a belief you already decided on. There is no response to be made here
How do those reactions fall into the same narrative about hierarchy
I don't care about whether people praise me or not in isolation, it's how they refuse to lose gracefully to me and visibly rage or come up with excuses when I beat them, while gushing over someone who's wins at something when they don't threaten their pre established feelings of where they are in the pecking order
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2025
Messages
19
I am not sure about this. Very interesting
While they recognize the supposed superiority of others in a given field who are no threat to them because the supposed superior ones only have that one trait which they base their identity around, they are in a box which they cannot exceed so they're allowed to be recognized for that one trait.
- Every instance of praise is a function of threat/hierarchy.
+ Recognition = no threat
+ No recognition = threat
It doesn't mean ALL negative/ambiguous feedback is jealousy, projection, or insecurity, I can accept instances of such feedback when it does reflect reality.
When retroactively connecting the dots of feedback towards me throughout my life, I noticed the pattern where any positive feedback towards me was withheld in situations where I dominated against normies but was given to others who were seen as no threat or were well established in the hierarchy when they were able to do similar or less than me.
- Hmm. I cannot think about this one
- No examples were provided in which someone criticized you and were right
- You only say its jealousy when you know it is, and hierarchy is only talked about because they do it first
- Question: What criteria do you use to decide when feedback reflects reality or comes from jealousy?
I don't see how what I'm writing has the same obsession with hierarchy.
I am only discussing the hierarchy because normies deny judging by merit in order to reserve approval for those who don't upset the existing hierarchy
I didn't form my thoughts on why people were reacting to me the way they were in real time.
I just questioned afterwards how it was such a consistent pattern that normies would actively ignore it when I achieved the most in a field that was objectively measurable, while they'd praise others for their displays of competence in certain fields while not objectively being the best.
I didn't give a fuck about receiving any positive feedback to them, I just couldn't understand how they could invest so much into verbalizing that x person was amazing in a certain field, when I was getting objectively better outcomes in that field, and my thread explained the reasons why they did this.
I don't see what more I'd need to explain
- You only talk about hierarchy because normies are obsessed with hierarchy
- you interpret their behavior as driven by hierarchy default
- The obsession is that the only possible explanation you consider for their behavior is “defending hierarchy.”
- You are still reading social behavior as a hierarchy-threat model

How do those reactions fall into the same narrative about hierarchy
- Praise = "honesty"
This only works if your default assumption is that you are at the top and praise is acknowledging your place
- no praise = threatened
A lack of praise is not disinterest, or different preferences. It can only mean hierarchy protection
- ghosting = insecurity
Ghosting can be random, disinterest, ... anything really. You immediately place it into the hierarchy narrarative: she fears being below you
- friend neutral reaction = protecting hierarchy
Neutrality is still interpreted as a threat response, it could be boredom, apathy, or anything else. It is interpreted as defense of his place in the social pecking order
- You interpret every income as proof you threaten their position
I don't care about whether people praise me or not in isolation
- uneven praise is evidence of a hierarchy
- [I think] that praise can come inconsistently for many reasons: friendship, randomness, ... You only allow one explanation
how they refuse to lose gracefully to me and visibly rage or come up with excuses when I beat them, while gushing over someone who's wins at something when they don't threaten their pre established feelings of where they are in the pecking order
- Still assuming your win threatens them
- their reaction must be insecurity
- praise of others is to preserve status
- excuses = coping, and their anger comes from inability to accept your superiority
The core narrarative is the same: they are reacting to you because you are superior and they are defending their position
 
Activity
So far there's no one here
Top