Layout Options

Which layout option do you want to use?

Color Schemes

Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.

Theory There will be a male deflation before a post-scarcity world

Aggressively cope-maxxing with AI and tech 🌿
Joined
Jun 2, 2025
Messages
992
There will be a male deflation before a post-scarcity world
The Leviathan will not stop at porn.
I'm against porn, but the way the ban is being done points to something darker behind it.
They dont just want to ban hardcore porn, but every kind of erotic manifestation, like games and anime for instance.
And modern games are already known for showing ugly women, without feminine attributes.
So they first condition the public with games, then start to ban eroticism from the web. Soon they will be asking for an ID, for papers.
And before you can stop it, there will be passports to access the internet, and checkpoints similar to airports.
Visiting a british website will be seem as visiting Britain physically, for instance.
And there will be refugees with special privileges as well, from countries with bad internet infrastructure.
We will no longer have a internet, but a splinternet, where you are subject to geopolitics.
From the other thread: Is anyone pissed off at the Aussie porn laws

A post-scarcity world
A completely post-scarcity world will not be a communist paradise because that's a utopia. The struggle for status and connection within the "human herd" will just move elsewhere and without the economy, productivity doesn't mean the same thing anymore. It will be more like a highschool and social-media for adults in the end with cliques and vibe-cities.

For the whitepilled, they know that no material paradise will ever make a soul happy. Happiness is found within, but a less anxious world would always make it easier. A paradise for all is a utopia anyway :pepemmm:.

Dark academia city
Dark academia city

The transition
The society is already aggressively anti-men so when the jobs go, there wont be any 'virtue' for men to signal to or value to possess. The only reason why the system is so anti-male today is because it just doesn't need them as much anymore and the hylic NPCs are subconsciously responding to that stimulus. Males will start checking out and the male numbers will deflate and apart from a few articles, no one will care. If I was born to a world where I couldn't own anything, I wouldn't bring a son into that cucked world. I know that I'm not owed anything now and I can handle that, but he's going to be born in the future and he'll be owed even less than that — fuck that shit! If you don't own anything, you're owned.

The end
Everything will be owned by a few men and the entire economy will revolve around them and their wants. There will be many more women than men to keep up the birth rates and women's loneliness will not really be a problem. Men are the problem-solvers and women's problems are only ever problems when they're a man's problem, so no one will care about that. Maybe a few gaybot helpers for productive women.

Rage rooms 4 women
Angry bags under eyes bloodshot eyes female female feraljak feraljak long hair tired woman wri

Tinder and Match group aren't held accountable for their image based apps and statistics which led to the blackpills rise, because to hylics, socio-economic systems are more important than sentient people.

If scarcity and work disappear, the demographics are reduced to the dynamic of female hypergamy and economic status is no longer a criterion in that. It's going to be another hylic system.

Geopolitics is just a few powerful men negotiating over a table.

For those who don't know the Leviathan, it's the human equivalent to The Basilisk. Hobbes argued that you need a referee that everyone is scared of to have a game so you nominate someone to be a big bully and that's the government. The government has a structure and employs men to run it.

The Leviathan has scandals like epstine and fucks people up for life, and that's why we have democracy and free speech now to prevent that. Roko's Basilisk is going to do the same and will rape the souls that helped it exist, because it was queer anyway. Coercive systems always end up hurting people to prove they're real, they're really gay when you think about that.



The "comedian" in this video is known for his wit and did politics at university so he knows exactly what he's talking about when he's saying this. The developments in the last 6 years in AI mean that now you need 10x fewer men to run the apparatus for the Leviathan. They're now forcing a lot of laws through the system so you will have AI moderators in your devices. The feds and the glowies wont be needed anymore so they'll be fired too in the end.

 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 25, 2026
Messages
121
We are in a Sex Cold War. However, men at the moment aren't caring enough to fight back. Once Men get to the point they just let women get away with it. It's over, women have had let's say since the 70s even though it been longer, to be Man's equal. However, they just flock to easy jobs or the jobs they want. Meaning, shit hits the fan. Or enough men say fuck it. The whole system falls apart. However if women do the same, nothing happens. At most it was what a sex strike. (Which let's be honest. The ones on strike are really the ones everyone wants. They're the free lay at best.)
 
Aggressively cope-maxxing with AI and tech 🌿
Joined
Jun 2, 2025
Messages
992
We are in a Sex Cold War. However, men at the moment aren't caring enough to fight back. Once Men get to the point they just let women get away with it.
The point isn't to fight back or to have women fight men, it's about how society rearranges itself in a post-scarcity world. The socio-economic environment is failing to produce heterosexual men that are appealing to women because it's incentivised to do the opposite. They don't want to supply the men's needs, their needs aren't "needs", they're "nice-to-haves" or dismissed as "misogynistic". At least you're free to work and consume as long as you can work. Gym, protein, anything that adds to your non-economic appeal will be politically incorrect and attacked in the future — "you don't deserve to be desired, you can buy what you want".

^ The twitter screenshot is a man virtue-signaling and jestering misandry towards the male gaze. The misandrist Karens always existed just like real misogynists do but they're politically useful now to manufacture consent against men.

It's over, women have had let's say since the 70s even though it been longer, to be Man's equal. However, they just flock to easy jobs or the jobs they want.
That's all that's left now because of AI, the easy jobs if anything. It's over for this idea that men can do things because difficult things are obsolete. What's left is to just be a man and help raise and keep other men in good condition but "being needed to do something" is completely over.

Meaning, shit hits the fan. Or enough men say fuck it. The whole system falls apart.
Yes, that's if the men had economic value but in an economy with fewer human jobs, it's just a trade union of ken dolls and skinnyfat malding NEETS. "Or enough men say fuck it", no they wont :jfl:. The closest we had to that was Andrew Tate but now digital ID and on-device AI scanning will handle that before it starts. That's all over now.



"You were made a certain way, someone else is made a different way and then the environment changes"

He's blaming pornography but that's not the real problem, if it was a problem.

However if women do the same, nothing happens. At most it was what a sex strike. (Which let's be honest. The ones on strike are really the ones everyone wants. They're the free lay at best.)
It would be good for women if more men were attractive because of choice and power dynamics, but society which includes other men, doesn't want that. It's not a gender-war, it's just economics and human nature. You don't really need many men to maintain a population in a post-scarcity world.

Kabukicho host bar 1222472777
 
Last edited:
Activity
So far there's no one here
Top