- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 203
My take is that its a false intellectual debate. Its like when the monks gather and summon an egregora. Its an idea that is completely divorced from reality, it came to be due to the repetition on the media, and the magazines that habituated people to the usage of the term.
The term creates the illusion of authority, and the illusion of historical stages. In practice, the term modernity puts a serie of social phenomena under criticism, like industrialization and secularism and capitalism and bureaucracy and the managerial castte and liberalism so on.
They put these things under the same umbrella, and their terminology begins to criticize anything and soon their attitude changes, now anything they dont like is "modernity".
"the modern world inevitably produces…"
When I listen something like this heres my reaction: fuck you I dont care, get fucked.
The term creates the illusion of authority, and the illusion of historical stages. In practice, the term modernity puts a serie of social phenomena under criticism, like industrialization and secularism and capitalism and bureaucracy and the managerial castte and liberalism so on.
They put these things under the same umbrella, and their terminology begins to criticize anything and soon their attitude changes, now anything they dont like is "modernity".
"the modern world inevitably produces…"
When I listen something like this heres my reaction: fuck you I dont care, get fucked.